Comments by "tblbaby" (@tblbaby) on "On The Regressive Left, Free Speech, Radical Islam | Nick Cohen | POLITICS | Rubin Report" video.

  1. +Pravin Maraj Dave is the other side. A person on the left who is reasonable. TYT are whack and dishonest, not reasonable. What good does it do to waste time with liars trying to con you? There are reasonable views based on facts most people would agree on. The rest is values based and that's a matter of philosophy. We can own our own philosophy ... we can't own our own facts. Our points of view and what we want to be true, doesn't affect fact on bit.
    4
  2. Tom J What you see Trump is and what Trump is are 2 different animals. Trump is highlighting for the Republican primary and he's brilliant in promotion ... thus results. The power people left and right are going after him, thus fox and the networks all attacking him. The sensible position on immigration isn't what media has been pushing. Soros Open Borders theme is built on his MO of bringing countries to ruin, and he has many times. More correctly he's been the face of it. Obama knows Soros well, and has worked for him. His mentor who is Jarrett's father is in the movement Soros is involved in. Why have a defacto policy to encourage unchecked immigration? In fact to have government busing in illegal immigrants while legal immigration of vetted people is at a crawl because of the mass illegal immigration? Why bring in unvetted Islamic groups of mostly military aged men when they could be protected closer to home? And maybe their women and children with them? Why do people follow so blindly that they think transforming the US into a place reflective of countries people are fleeing is a good idea? Wouldn't integration be smarter? The US is a nice place to live for a reason. It's frustrating to uber wealthy corrupt who'd like to take what they want and have the people subservient to a government they can buy for a reason. Trump thinks we should have sane immigration and not bring in people who wish us harm, and or don't want to assimilate. He thinks pushing back the recent invasion would be a good idea ... and it is. That isn't bigotry. It's just anti destructive, while the government and media, colleges, entertainment, are pushing destructive. Trump is right. See it now or see it later. He's also loud, it's how he does what he does. His results speak well of his style.
    3
  3. Arka Dhak Christianity doesn't direct slavery. Islam does. You have a problem with PEOPLE who can be greedy scum bags. PEOPLE are the problem with Christianity. Group think is the problem with Christianity ... but it's not a Christian thing, it's a people thing. Islam is directed by the Koran. The Koran is ugly in it's instructions of rape, slavery, theft, murder, terror, genocide. In a reasoned analysis you can't equate the two. You're surfing on logical fallacy. Lot of people do it, but it's no way to come to a reasoned conclusion.
    2
  4. Arka Dhak Now your take on the USA, it's pretty emotional, pretty absolutist. I really dig guns. They are great tools. They also empower the weak against the strong, and the innocent against criminals who can plot a time and place and plan as well as gather a force so it will be an uneven attack ... they don't need guns for that. To defend against such things, guns are the best tool available. Police of course can't be everywhere. We couldn't afford it, and who wants that? I can defend myself and those around me. Good people armed are much more effective than police. You're ranting on because of ideas you've been shown, about what you really don't understand.
    2
  5. Arka Dhak lol, pretty bigoted. You make sweeping bigoted statements. You have passion in you. Why not direct it in a real way? Your view of the US is maybe true in some cases, but it's not generally accurate. Saddam attacked Kuwait, many countries were involved in helping Kuwait. Saddam signed a treaty with conditions. Saddam broke those conditions and 13 more resolutions in a row. Saddam was bribing UN officials with oil money and starving most of his people, the ones who didn't support him. He was engaged in genocide of several groups in Iraq. The US enforced the UN Treaty that most other countries would not. Also it came out that Saddam was colluding with France, Russia, and China. He had plans to sweep through the middle east and take control of massive amounts of oil, cutting other countries in. The WMD was in Iraq. Much was shipped to Syria (according to the general in charge of Iraqi air forces) and they are finding it as it's used by some reports. The Intelligence report that there was no WMD? It wasn't normal to do that. They couldn't know. Intelligence practice isn't to give a definitive statement to something they can't prove. It was surely a political statement forced by political officials. That's not good intelligence work. After this declaration they found an entire fleet of Iraqi Jets they'd never found in their search. If those Jets were there and they'd never seen them, how could they be sure of WMD? They couldn't. There is a lot more than you're getting information wise. Not saying the US is perfect, especially these days. Obama is downing or attempting to down leaders in the Middle East who've kept peace by keeping the crazies from Running Amok. Like Assad, who he tried to topple, who was fighting the Rebels who ARE ISIS. He took down Mubarak who was keeping reasonable peace in Egypt, but he had to kick ass on the crazies to do it. Also Qaddafi in Libya who was doing pretty well for the Libyan people, but refusing whatever Soros was trying to get him to do. But Iran? Those nut bars who kill their own people constantly for perceived offenses? Who won't allow a real election and so the people rose up ... did Obama lift a finger for their legitimate uprising? Hell No, and he's got something going with Iran. His history is linked to them, his closest adviser is Iranian, his mentor was her father and a seriously corrupt & seditious individual. So no, I don't back the US in these things. Something really smells dead and rotting, about them.
    2
  6. +Arka Dhak Criticizing Israel in favor of Palestinians / Muslims, is idiotic and ignorant. The historical claims on are Israel's side ... yes the true ones are. The moral high ground? There is NO QUESTION Israel holds the high ground. Israel could destroy the Palestinians, kill them all, they don't. The Palestinians would completely wipe out Israel if they could. In fact they would wipe out the rest of the world of non Muslims if they could. If you don't understand this, you are ignorant. PERIOD
    2
  7. Contrarian Dude Dave did Crowder, which is how this place got infested with me, lol. Crowder is pretty libertarian and reasonable, except when he's a Christian fascist on some elements where for some damned reason evangelical types and harder liners feel the government should forsake the Constitution for Christian preferences, which isn't even good Christianity. 
    1
  8. The Sprawl Blacklist is a bit drastic as well as controlling. Would have consequences we probably don't want, but it would be good to take some power away from the divisionaries by showing them for what they are and their effects for what those are. The problem is division creates profit through political power and unity really doesn't create the urgency needed to inspire what's needed because people don't think that way, long term, usually. Power equates to Profit people with a lot of money will invest in. Greed inspires stupid people and there are many of them to bribe / con. Something to work on maybe. If we care about the state of the world. 
    1
  9. +Arka Dhak That's funny because you draw equality between the Bibles teaching and the Koran. That's about the stupidest thing I've ever heard (>.<) try reading each. Check out politicalislam.com if you are not afraid to read ... honestly I can't see you reading, because if you did you wouldn't have made such a ridiculous comment.
    1
  10. Arka Dhak There is a time for war, or else you'd be extinct. I don't think your quote is very precise either, lol. When you have to reach like that, you have to know the argument you're attempting is weak. There is no loss of pride involved in rational discourse. Trying to back a point that ain't makin it isn't necessary. No shame in switching upon the addition of new information.
    1
  11. Arka Dhak Study the analysis of a brilliant scientist and you'll be much better informed than 99% of the people having this conversation. politicalislam.com 
    1
  12. Arka Dhak You're switching the focus of the discussion. So you concede the point? Islam is nothing like Christianity.
    1