Comments by "Arthur Mosel" (@arthurmosel808) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
28
-
20
-
Unfortunately no in this case. Three people hold responsibility, because normal procedure requires each to check it according to available information. The armored is the first, the assistant director should have checked it, and finally the actor using it. Obviously, none did that required check, the only question remains who is criminally liable if anyone. Mr. Baldwin has an additional problem since as a producer and on set, he should have insured all safety procedures were followed, especially since there were two earlier incidents, so is their criminal or civil liability for his negligence, as the producer, in insuring the safe operation of the filming. A very sticky situation for all.
18
-
15
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2