Comments by "Arthur Mosel" (@arthurmosel808) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
35
-
16
-
13
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
@davidvonkettering204 By this point, hanging probably would have been the punishment. Either way the risked their lives and fortunes, no matter the cancel movement for the slave owners day, they were men of their time. It is a shame that we h a very forgotten so much of t he intent. No state was to control the Capitol, that is why the District of Columbia. It was to be a small Government controlling things that required a unified response, defense and mail. There weren't to be any political parties. The people didn't elect the President; but rather Electors who were supposed to reflect the will of the people electing them. The electors were to sit down and decide on the nest man for the job of President, today it would be the best person. The Senator were elected by state legislator and were to represent their states and have a long enough term that demagogues won't control the results. The people's direct representatives were the member of the House of Representatives. Their terms were short to allow for public approval and sentiment to be expressed but we ith the Senats to prevent a demagogue from gaining control. We lost all that though, parties were formed and the electors came to represent party candidates and the Representatives the same. Fina
lly, the Senators became party candidates no longer representing the State and long term interests; but rather the party's current ideologies and leaders, made worse in some ways by a third of the Senate being elected every two years. Instead of a parttime Government the positions worked throughout the year with a permanent bureaucracy to run it. Then Administrative courts were added that didn't follow the Constitution since people hauled in front of them are presumed guilty and have to p r over their innocence. Now, we are rapidly becoming a one party state whose elected officials lie with impunity. Franklin, if I remember, said something to the effect we have give you a republic if you can keep it. The Founders are at least rollin in their graves.
2
-
2
-
@JackHartigan Not really, or you won't have so many wanting thd change over to stop. The only question is do we want evrry country eventually using their own system or return to the Standard System. Business was a winner with the semiannual change since it did reduce requirements for energy use. It has been going on so long that unless you study history; you don't know why this particular dance was started. Too many Government behaviors started for good reason, but have continued because bureaucracies don't like abolishing things. Not related but pertinent, remember the military's super expensive hammers and toilet seats? Well procurement officials were using the same standard contract for them as nuclear weapons components which required large amounts of paperwork and compliance documentation, most of the cost actually was the administrative expense of documentation and the personal running the system. Bureaucracies are like that, tell them you need a tack and you get a gold plated one because it is easier to duplicate the requisition than right a specific one. Similarly, look at the end of year spending sprees. You have to spend what you requested for the year or next year the budget. I was overseas, and needed an item, the contract was outsourced to a special purchasing program rather than either a company normally in the business or allowing me to get a host country contractor. Two years in a row contractors under that program failed to deliver; and since I was prohibited from filling the funds over, I had to spend them and place the new request in the following years budget. The special procurement policy involved was a failure; but politics and social concerns made sure that we were stuck with it. So not all dumb things are done for power and control, but rather ideology and/or laziness.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@larry6601 I am no professional programmer, but on several occassions I have worked closely with them in developing programs/record systems that I needed. 8n at least one case, I caught the assumption that the programmer made that turned an existing data base into garbage when forgot that those entering the data did not all finish an entry the same (some added a space). The affect was cumulative, throwing each next entry off by an additional amount, the NRC wasn't happy with the results and it rolled down hill. I have done some simple programming myself after I bought my first computer back in 1982. So I do brave great respect for those with the patience to work at it.
My work involved command and control, planning for, responding to, and recovering from various emergencies and disasters (man-made or natural). As a result I have a strong belief that a certain percentage (usually small thank God) are totally unethical, will cut corners or try to cheat. So, I am routinely assume the worst and hope for the best. If you've planned on the worst, anything less is easy. Also effecting my beliefs is the fact that I have spent a great deal of my military time around special ops and electronic security units. Some thing that makes it easy to accept that there are people out there ours and theirs who are willing and able to do not so wonderful things. Not bad when it happens to an enemy, not so much when your side is on the receiving end.
Something to remember is that the system used in Arizona (and some other states in 2020) fought releasing information on their system because it was proprietary, not an open system. It was in Arizona where someone from the company made a software upgrade after the machines were certified according to some sources. We'll never know for sure because the court cases never got to discovery. So, to me, these were two red flags that should have been checked and resolved. If you have nothing to hide, why hide.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1