Comments by "Winsome Martinez" (@winsomemartinez) on "Biden has changed his story at least four times: Kash Patel" video.

  1. Democrats need to call Lev Parnas to testify. And while they're at it, get Patel on a lie detector.
    6
  2. Lev Parnas needs to testify to Congress.
    4
  3. Maybe because "the bombshell" is a dud? Nothing Archer will say will incriminate anyone. If children capitalizing on their parents' fame were a crime, we'd have Jared on the docket before Hunter.
    3
  4. Hmm, Jared came back from Saudi Arabia with $2 billion from MBS to invest. Jared gets a cut of this investment money, as well as a percentage of investment gains. This, even though Jared has spent his life doing real estate, not stock investing. He is not only Trump's son-in-law, he was also most definitely part of the administration. Perhaps we also need hearings into his trips to Qatar and to question why the US declared Qatar an enemy of the US, only to reverse this declaration 7 days later once Jared's father had secured a business loan from Qatar. 🤔
    3
  5. Speaking of mugshots, will Jack Smith have Donald Trump photographed at his next arraignment? Or is this one of those "two-tiered justice" things? Everyone else who gets arraigned in the US has mugshots taken, why not this fkn guy?
    2
  6. Same as Jared, the suggested "good-will" of the US government. This has been happening from a very long time, well before Jared or Hunter. One might ask of their favored politicians why this has never been made a crime, but if anyone in government points a finger it would implicate all of them.
    2
  7. Have Lev Parnas testify.
    2
  8. Get Lev Parnas to testify.
    2
  9. Hmm, and yet there are some very definite boundary lines within which influence peddling is considered a crime. Outside these lines, it is simply inferred as business as usual. Now, if we only had a good definition like Quid Pro Quo, which could define these things.... 🤔. As mentioned before, almost anyone in government could come up with laws which better define the act with much less gray area, like banning nepotism or any familial profiteering, and yet none of them are willing. Least of all the great maga hero. Why is this?
    1
  10.  @brianvasko5048  I completely understand that you are unable to refute anything I typed, but perhaps hold back with the childishness. It truly shows your incompetence.
    1
  11. Devon Archer and Tony Bobulinski have already said in public that Biden gave greetings and accolades to business contacts many times...and nothing else, so nothing new or damning there. But Parnas has names, dates and the redacted name from the FD-1023. Comer, Jordan, and certainly Grassley don't want that name known.
    1
  12. ​ @dalejames8576  Everyone needs to hear Lev Parnas testify. Why not? Afraid of some truth? He has names, dates, and even knows exactly who filed the FD-1023 with the FBI. The American people deserve to know the truth. Rudy may provide this information also, right after his upcoming indictment for election interference. 🤷
    1