Comments by "Omer عمر" (@Omer1996E.C) on "Iran said to abolish morality police: What does it mean? | DW News" video.
-
@xtaticsr2041 I still don't believe that most people are against theocracy in of itself, but the regime which is authoritarian, because the religion commands the use of fair and impartial judiciary systems, and makes every one, including the police, accountable to their actions, which is not the case in iran.
So, going against the theocracy is still not the solution, especially since most Iranians are still religious in the first place, we do not want the same system to return by a democracy, after the rural population gets against the new regime. What should be done is a limited government with fair legislations, fair judicial systems and reformed police forces
9
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tero2444 what? Actually a state built on a religious base is much more stable in law making, religion, at least mine, is well defined and no body can change it, since it is spread throughout many parts of the earth, and it is hard for anybody to change it. Democracy is built on fantasy and whims, when they want immigrants or not, when they declare war or not, when they deny LGBTQ or not, when they are communist or capitalist, when they are ethnocentrist or not, etc... All change with the change of popular belief. If a people want to commit crimes against another country for revenge (like how fascist Italy invaded ethiopia by popular support), nothing is wrong according to the democratic constitution, if it was made by a referendum, while religion has a well known strict line, that is not based on people's emotions, like the want to revenge
1
-
1