Youtube comments of Omer عمر (@Omer1996E.C).
-
2500
-
352
-
295
-
252
-
240
-
217
-
191
-
183
-
172
-
136
-
130
-
115
-
112
-
98
-
96
-
87
-
79
-
77
-
73
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
68
-
63
-
59
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
53
-
51
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
47
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
Indeed. Like, the US has a forced base, Guantanamo bay, in cuba, with bases and operation centers only 500 km far from Moscow, the USA encircles China from every side in Taiwan, Okinawa, Philippines and more.
The USA does the same in Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, KSA, UAE and Pakistan against Iran.
This is a legit move for Cuba, which as been unjustly treated by th USA. Being a neighbour of the USA is a nightmare, being a member of the USA is most probably a good thing, which Puerto Rico isn't allowed to be
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
As a Muslim who's main topic is economics, I studied this alot because it affected the foundations of my faith, even studied why Israel was so rich and Pakistan so poor, and basically every western nation rich, and Muslim nation poor
My final conclusion was that, Islamic law isn't being implemented at all, the whole problem lied on the governments, just written laws and never really implemented, especially Islamic economic laws, that promotes free trade as heck and minimum government control, minimum intervention even if you're starving. For example, in Islam, additional taxes are not allowed except in crisis, especially taxes on trade, so much that the prophet compared anyone who taxes trade with adulterous. And price regulations is strictly prohibited as it's proven in hadith and sunnah. And as you said, feudalism was prohibited in Islam, that was even a boost for us
This is never implemented in muslim countries, they are too authoritarian to accept the rules
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
@atamanch first, i meant overseas invasions
Second, I acknowledge their aggression on land and in s.china sea. But what I meant was that China doesn't have a history (at least a well known one) of putting dangerous military bases and toppling governments, as well as denying trade for other countries forcefully. Something the US and other NATO members are very known for.
I'm generally against large foreign establishments, but compared to US military bases existence, I think the Chinese commercial approach is more acceptable, peaceful and more reliable. I believe that if it was military base, it might create some balance of powers. And we do need some balance of power and breaking of hegemony currently.
Maybe it's because you are American or pro-US, but the USA has been bullying many of us alot and it's supremacy can hardly be tolerated, it's an international threat (I'm not exaggerating, because anything that threatens most world countries, is an international threat, just like global warming)
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
The USA putting such bases in Taiwan, Okinawa, Philippines and basically encircling China. The USA with such bases in Russian neighbouring countries that are 400 km far from Moscow, a 10 minute journey with an fighter jet, and Ukraine literally being called to join NATO by some member states. The USA having such bases in Bahrain, Qatar, Iraq, Pakistan, UAE and KSA all near Iran
And then the Americans complain and have a paranoia about a single base or operation in Cuba, which in fact has Guantanamo Bay of the US military on it (a militiary occupation by every definition).
Political Hipocrisy at its peak.
I don't like governments of Iran, Russia and China, but such attitudes from the west are part of the reason why these nations get aggressive
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
Notice, Iran's population drop is happening mainly among the irreligious people, which means that only religious people will keep procreating, and so only religious population will grow, unless the religious themselves grow irreligious, which is happening.
So, there's a balancing act, which will make seeing a secular Iran further than we expect.
Iran's problem is the corrupt government system, which was THE reason for the islamic revolution. Most irreligious people in Iran are irreligious due to the past monarchy harsh secularisation effect, not due to grievances from the current regime, especially since most blanes can be appropriately placed on foreign sanctions, though there are grievances from the current system, even among the religious, as we can see in the Iranian elections, when the khameni himself elected the progressive party.
17
-
@JSM-bb80u we've heard all this before. Even that the Jordanian king was freedom fighter, or the baathist regime wasn't radical.
You definitely don't know about middle eastern leaders, they're officially anti-colonial, in reality colonial westerners. Especially that borgiba scum, he used to call the French ambassador to tell him how many Tunisians didn't fast, left hijab or got drunk.
And ataturk, got educated in italy, not in turkey, and he imposed his ideas without ever listening to the people, as he installed corrupt officials that helped Turkey to stay poor, and only after 2000 some development was seen. And that Reza was the beginning of westernisation, secularisation and anti-culturalism of Iran, tho better than the brits, he was not much better, just better because you know he wouldn't sell his country at least, but look at how bad teacher/father he was
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
Also add that South Korea had 3 advantages
1, it was a US ally, so, as you've said, there actually were some Ivy league korean graduates working with the south korean military.
2, it was a US ally, so, the US didn't use as much intelligence agents as they had in enemy countries like in Cuba, so secretly making a military project was easier
3, it was a US ally, so, South Korea isn't treated like Egypt, for example, because if Egypt became too strong, it might be an existential threat to Israel, so the US have alot of incentives to punish Egypt if it developed its own military industry. But S.K IS the ally to be protected in the first place, just like Israel, and so the US have low incentives to punish S.K or fear it.
South Korea is a different story that can't be replicated in many countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, for example, who also have higher military spendings and capabilities, but mainly bought from the US
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@JSM-bb80u I'm not arguing, but what I want to say is that it's colonial to think like the coloniser, you've effectively become him, just of a different race, and race wasn't the reason why Tunisians fought. Second, tell me which part of sharia for example? You just say things without knowing.
The DRC is among the poorest nations on earth, so democracy is bad. Is that true? Or is it because DRC didn't implement democracy well?
So, saying islamic law is bad is very illogical, considering that no muslim country implements the sharia well.
So, if islamic law is implemented well, it's good. If democracy is implemented well, it's good.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@spxram4793 it's not about arab leaders, leaders are not that influential in the mindset of arabs, it's mostly the clergy and intellectuals actually.
The intellectuals remind the people how israel was created when it wasn't a thing, imported from Europe.
The nationalists tell the people that this land is occupied, and it was never israeli, but arab.
The activists tell that these lands are stolen from the rightful people, and that thieves shouldn't be acknowledged
The others say that israel is an existential threat, since its main job is to be an aircraft carrier for the western world, divide the arab world at its geographic center, and it has an ambition to expand to medina and turkey, iraq and egypt as well. And many israelis actually say this out loud.
Then the religious institution continously preaches about the day that'll come, regimes change and israel comes to an end. So, no need to have a peace with temporary entity, as they say.
The problem is that there's no a defined timeframe for a "temporary" entity, except that it's not permanent, which is very vague.
A lot of you seem to not understand that immense soft power of the religious institution in the arab world, even if it's probably one of the most suppressed/silenced institutions in the world.
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@xtaticsr2041 I still don't believe that most people are against theocracy in of itself, but the regime which is authoritarian, because the religion commands the use of fair and impartial judiciary systems, and makes every one, including the police, accountable to their actions, which is not the case in iran.
So, going against the theocracy is still not the solution, especially since most Iranians are still religious in the first place, we do not want the same system to return by a democracy, after the rural population gets against the new regime. What should be done is a limited government with fair legislations, fair judicial systems and reformed police forces
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@hmalik5232 when you lose the debate, u use the "Islam spread by sword" and "religion of terror" cards, stop fooling yourself. You know that Indonesia, somali, subsaharan and turkish regions weren't conquered by caliphates but they are predominantly Muslim, and Egypt, iraq, syria, Lebanon and many others have millions of non muslims and orthodox Christians from centuries of Islamic conquest. As well non muslim majority former Muslim territories like, Iberia, balkans, sicily, India, ethiopia, west Africa have non muslim majority populations despite being under Muslim rule. Nobody forced you into Islam and yet you pretend.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I can't feel bad for Ukraine.
Since it's ok to bombard those without blonde hair, blue eyes, middle income, non Europeans, non white, non middle eastern, non African peoples, then why should I be so sad. Especially after Europe sport institutions advocated for support of Ukraine, but always used to say that politics cannot interfere in sports when we defended palestine during the sheikh jarrah apartheid genocide, which is still happening, but the west is so biased and claims that they have democratic values
if Europe just acted on what you have said.
By the way, did you know that Ukraine was one of the nations who supported invasion of iraq and defended Israeli assaults on palestinians?
Sorry people, I can't do it remembering that Ukraine was one of the countries comforting from my parent's misery
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@spxram4793 not quite frankly. This is also something many don't understand. These are not democratic countries, and therefore, having an influence over the people doesn't mean having an influence on the government, like you, democratic nations have.
The military in the case of Egypt, and the ruling families (actually many families in each country) in the case of monarchies, who are the protectors of the regimes, are the ruling elite, not anyone else.
Of course, there are some corrupt religious figures, intellectuals, representatives, etc... that are also part of the regimes, but these are minorities, the exception to the rule, who are used to try and control the masses, but are ineffective when over-exploited (like if a cleric lie alot to save the government, he'll overtime lose popular trust and become ineffective).
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Sad about the critics sensors and how lies spread about the P*alestin*ian struggle like killing and kidnapping civilians (while most are actually reservists), beheaded 40 babies (Haaretz of Israel and the IDF had denied it happening basically), their bad treatments (actually prisoners and recaptured towns residents proved they weren't bad except for all military units) and that Palestinians initiated the war (that was actually by Israel in the town of Hawara by killing and injuring many, and I even have proofs), while no one has a single evidence against my points
While denying all these Israeli crimes, many fake Palestinian ones, and mock religion + ethnicities, let alone killing and torturing all these Palestinians in Gaza, men who provide for families, women who raise children, blameless children, weak elders using white phosphorus (banned internationally) in hospitals, ambulances, mosques, refugee camps, etc... That are all proven by locals to be free from any official or military works. Even UNURWA school, hospital and refugee camp of the UN was bombed by Israel, although the UN proved that they never allowed or witnessed these Palestinians. Such a terrorist state of Israel slandering others, just to eliminate them
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Commander-McBragg you don't believe in every thing real, you believe in everything sensible, material and what you see as "real"
I searched for the truth for long, even tried nihilism, only to return to where I was as I wasn't wrong from the beginning, but I still have some nihilistic thoughts that doesn't contradict my faith
Ask me anything you want about Islam or any stereotype or whatever, show me what you know about Islam, we have a buffet of reasons for you to open your mind to us: tens of prophesies that happened, are happening and will happen, a flawless holy book, precise systems of justice and law (that our current governments don't want to implement it because it's too anti-government control for them), scientific evidences, etc... Just ask
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@mwanikimwaniki6801 it's engineering, yes. The government is pushing for education and not using the educated workforce, these engineers are mostly Italians and Chinese. The government should either improve the education, so that ethiopians can get good jobs, or tell us to study other fields with demand in ethiopia. In rural regions, they are not told these things, they think they could just learn engineering and go to addis ababa and get a job. Please, sir, understand me, education is important, but it should be used very wisely, for you, not against you
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Thank you VE, as this actually doesn't make enough sense. These explanations to what many people think to be true
Hotter regions receive more energy from the sun and have more equal day-night times, which are factors that brings prosperity. But forget about this
South africa is poorer than North African nations, despite being cooler, Highlands of Ethiopia, which has similar temperatures as western USA, with a population of +65 million, but is still one of the poorest countries. Russia isn't any better than Australia. Civilizations started in what we consider hot regions.
Plus, cooler countries spend more on heating, thus wasting money, so they aren't actually anh better in spending, perhaps even worse costs
Saying that cooler nations are richer just because they are cool is a hoax.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Victory for Palestine, being attacked by an occupier sitting in their homes and eating from their farms confiscated by the occupier.
Sad about the critics sensors and how lies spread about the P*alestin*ian struggle like killing and kidnapping civilians (while most are actually reservists), beheaded 40 babies (Haaretz of Israel and the IDF had denied it happening basically), their bad treatments (actually prisoners and recaptured towns residents proved they weren't bad except for all military units) and that Palestinians initiated the war (that was actually by Israel in the town of Hawara by killing and injuring many, and I even have proofs), while no one has a single evidence against my points
While denying all these Israeli crimes, many fake Palestinian ones, and mock religion + ethnicities, let alone killing and torturing all these Palestinians in Gaza, men who provide for families, women who raise children, blameless children, weak elders using white phosphorus (banned internationally) in hospitals, ambulances, mosques, refugee camps, etc... That are all proven by locals to be free from any official or military works. Even UNURWA school, hospital and refugee camp of the UN was bombed by Israel, although the UN proved that they never allowed or witnessed these Palestinians. Such a terrorist state of Israel slandering others, just to eliminate them
3
-
3
-
3
-
Thank you so much for your honesty, I'm really surprised a westerner saw the whole picture and condemned Israel.
For those thinking it was all unprovoked, that's a pure western media lie, it's always Israel that starts the problem but no western media cover it
First, Gaza was besieged for years on air, sea and land, Israel control the blood vessels of Gaza and they really tightened it, inflation because of shortages was killing them because Israel wanted to kill them slowly, Gaza targeted schools, the largest residential towers, hospitals, ambulances, mosques, refugee camps, etc... All which are supposedly internationally protected, but Israel is too bloody to hear this, they're the coward version of the mongols of today, and act victim
Then, israeli radicals made alot of harassments on civilians as usual, but things escalated when a day before the war Israelis encircled and sieged the peaceful Palestinian town of Hawara, all unprovoked, and killed alot of people, and at least 78 people were wounded, al in the west bank where people don't have weapons in the first place.
May victory be with the oppressed Palestinians 🇵🇸
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Blah888 let's go again, my comment is being deleted, so I'll used wrong and twisted letters in some words. Like "f" means "v", ok 👍
1st, Muslims started to flow outside??? I think this is a language matter, not history
2nd, slafe industry?? Whatever, SLAfE TRADE to be honest with you, was even worse in india, just like how europeans called slaves "serfs", who were practically slafes.
And who said that slafery (we don't use this term Islamically, we use "riq", since we are all slafes of God) is the same everywhere? Slafery in Europe is human ownership often with no rights for slafes but life, slafery in islam is a mandated servitude with high protected rights, including 10 common rules for any slave to be free, other than the owner's permission. This is disregarding the fact that freeing a slafe is one of the most recommended things in islam, it's considered a charity. And even this slafery can happen only in certain ways, like we can't just take any weak person and call him a slafe, you actually have a whole set of rules of war to have rights over him, such as him being a prisoner of war or guilty of its crimes.
And finally, the indian economy didn't fall during mughal times, get your facts right. The indian economy's share of the global gdp started to fall for good.
First, the chinese economic growth was so great, and china reached its peak at the time with 35 percent of world's gdp.
Then, Europe, which was experiencing renaissance, then enlightenment, then industrial revolution, and let's not forget the colonisation of the Americas, which boosted their economies tremendously
And others, such as the Russian Empire, the ottoman empire, the persian empire, Africa's new empires rising, and so on and so forth.
So, the indian economy was doing great under muslim rule until the Europeans came, and the world was growing, which is a good thing. You want other peoples to starve?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@yopyop3241 this thing even puzzled me alot, until I realised one thing, that the only thing that can move the arab populace is the religious institution, especially if the islamists came to the show. I'm not saying they're good or bad, but that they're the one holding the flag. But now, the religious institution is severely silenced and islamists are criminalised by almost every ruling regime, which effectively paralysed the Arab peoples. Why? Because this is an institution that dominated for 1300 years, and its suddenly being aggressively attacked and torn down by governments. There is no another organiser. Islamists were the main organisers of the 2011 arab spring, the main reason arab monarchies are under any internal threat, the one who killed the Egyptian president, the one who provoked ISIS growth, and they're the only reason why arab governments are practically secular, but they never declare secularism to avoid an islamic revolution. Islamists are not necessarily criminals, they're just too frustrated. Why would any nation's government be secular when its people doesn't want it. Look at how Saudi Arabia was peaceful before MBS, because it was very conservative and didn't explicitly enter yemen, just like how most people liked. But now, after opening up, it's being in a somehow threatening situation, with many clerics imprisoned or on 💀 row. So, the only reason why Islamists are a threat, is because arab governments doesn't want to go by the will of their peoples. It's so plain and simple unless your only focus is power, and the US is pulling you to that side by assuring you that they'll protect your power.
The other thing might be that the "arab street" only needs one part of it to move, then the whole arab world erupts, just like the arab spring. But I'm not sure about this, except if Egypt's government fell, then I'm sure many of the others would follow.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@kth6736 this is the real free market. You love economic boom, but you hate bust. Still, you shouldn't make an artificial government act to resist a recession, it can be painful, but it is a natural corrective event, where inefficient producers and consumers lose (but in real life, lobbies convince the government to pump stimulus packages to rescue themselves), thereby removing the most inefficient and harmful economic agents, and the economy would start fresh, with cheaper resources available for newer, smaller and more advanced industries.
Play with free market, don't play on it
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dantethearab796 wow, how academic are you. Google is your source??!!
Then, what does large means, is it an amount, or age, or geographical distance crossed. And he didn't talk about the Islamic stance on slavery, wasn't he explaining slavery in islam, rather than just coming across the topic and leaving it?
Then, you also have to see that he only considered his philosophical point of view, never looked into Islam or Muslims. He didn't see how Islam advocates education and work.
Hell!! He even claimed that the less Christians, the less education. Although almost all scientists and scholars were Muslims in the first place.
There alot of problems in here
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CodyMapping where are you from, my dear? If you're an Ethiopian, you know things have always been bad here, least of the time of Abiy, but you can't deny that Ethiopia is growing very fastly, economically speaking. Every ethnicity in Ethiopia was treated unfairly by amharas, tigrians and now, oromos, but growth has been happening since 1991, that's undeniable, and niw, it's much better than ever, and it'll keep getting better with time
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@instaminox i honestly got emotional, I'm normally not emotional at all, but the amount of people saying these words really heart me. Plus, I think I was more angry because I was hungry since I was fasting monday 😅. But I suddenly felt islam dissappeared from muslims' hearts.
We need to spread awareness about this issue. Muslims of rohingya, syria and Palestine are all equal, and their resistance is absolutely legitimate. I've grown my whole life learning about syria and the arab world, we need change of arab governments if we want peace in Palestine, we don't need change in Israel, cuz we'll be able to make israel just a history, only if our governments got better.
Thank you for your understanding, and I hope more understand for the sake of justice.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@conflictedthought1 it is easier to change cultures in a dictatorship, the same way one child policy was implemented and the Chinese 'Great Prolitarian Cultural Revolution'.
You can manipulate your people more easily. I told you, you just need enough political will to do it if you are in a dictatorship, not much popular support, but it would be great to have it, so just change the education system, welfare system, bureaucratic system, etc... To honor large families and mothers. Plus, don't give commercial education to women and contraceptives, and give them maternal & parental education, and finally, treat children as investments and retirement plans for parents
And voila, you have the perfect environment and recipe for a population explosion
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@9000Dogs tbh, there is, you just couldn't see it, Palestinians are just trying to defend their rights, they get bombarded, evicted, imprisoned (in fact Israel has much more Palestinians in their prisons, not convicted of crimes, but political prisoners)
But in Israel and Palestine situation, it's fully Israeli terrorism, they started the war by The Hawara Incident, dozens of Palestinians killed and 78 wounded, all unprovoked and without a weapon being owned by the Palestinians, Palestinians just retaliated
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@johnyoung4163 no. After what I've seen happen to their people, never.
Btw, I'm not an Arab, but as an African, this is how my grandfathers fought for independence, and it's totally legitimate.
Settlers living for generations would never legitimise their residence, let alone legitimising my eviction, discrimination, impoverishment, deprivation and suppression, mostly indirectly. The world won't recognise the legitimacy of a resistance or opposition force unless it wins. Believe it or not, Nelson Mandela, the first president of post-apartheid South Africa, was on the te**0*!$ተ list of the USA until 2008. A man who shouldn't have been considered any bad for any reason, except for causing reasonable civilian suffering.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm in ethiopia, why should I care? Because it affects me a little bit, since 99 percent of the ethiopian electricity is green and renewable, and a new turbine is working in the grand ethiopian renaissance dam, and it will be finished after 2 or three years. Then there is other geothermal & solar projects going on. In fact, ethiopia will start in few months exporting electricity to Kenya, South sudan and sudan might join the buyers, as well as American investors in newly discovered gas fields in the eastern deserts of ogaden region (potentially having oil too), we don't use gas here, it's unnecessary in the good climates of the ethiopian highlands. And ethiopia is operating a huge agricultural revolution, heavy rains are still there and increasing by years. You can see vertical farms popping up here in addis ababa, cereals are being farmed at an unprecedented levels and Ukrainian wheat has just arrived at the ethiopian borders. We are not perfectly fine, but we are better off than half of the world nations
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@boatfloat1412 I'm basing my consideration of good leadership as a true democratic government. And I disagree with you this is because a democratic leadership hears it's people, and most Middle Easterns hate Israel to be honest
Most emiratis, saudis, Egyptians, Jordanians, Sudanese and Moroccans hate Israel, and they were forced to make deals with them, all of them are (unsurprisingly) under totalitarian or simply unlimited ruling system. And if a really democratic government came, it is a disaster, since these countries will experience high economic growth, along with their already high fertility rates.
Last time a real election happened, MB party won in Egypt, that promised to develop Egypt and liberate Palestine, only to be removed by a military coup that is ruling the country until today
2
-
@puraLusa when it comes to legal sharia law, only small parts of Islam is changing (with different interpretations) but these are largely overseen by non-Muslims, idk why
And about picking a side, this is not part of Islam, this is only if there was no evidence for anyone who own it, as it was said in the video, most people used oral testimonies, but in Islam you can use material evidences (and it has a priority), like an ownership paper, a paper indicating that you bought this land and others, if both of you don't have any evidence, the one who was already running that facility would be the owner
So, what we say is that you can own something and have an ownership document for it like nowadays, and it is given a priority as primary evidences.
Oral testimonies are the secondary evidences, if the primary exists, then the secondary would be invalid
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@seyyes2047 I'm tired of this argument honestly
You just got Egyptians out of the equation because it didn't fit your argument
About saudis, they have alot of cultural non religious norms, remember the car driving ban on women? Yes, it was cultural not religious law, as you know Saudis are generally traditionalist tribalists, so you shouldn't connect to everything they do culturally to Islam
Until the reformation movement, women were freer in the Islamic world than the western world, the they became equal, and in the 20th century, western women became freer in the western world.
Do you seriously think that all the economic problems are just because women are partially in the labour market, and you threw corruption, over regulation, lack of education... out of the window?!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TahsanHasan-x7q unislamic is anything that goes against what Allah and his prophet ordered, [(16:116) And do not utter falsehoods by letting your tongues declare: "This is lawful"116 and "That is unlawful," thus fabricating lies against Allah. Surely those who fabricate lies against Allah will never prosper.] Surah Al-Nahl.
Imposing hijab headscarf is mandatory, so Taliban did the right thing. I hope every muslim country imposes hijab.
Buy, according to the Quran, Taliban, who made it haram to show face, are guilty of declaring something not haram as haram.
My problem is not with the head covering, but with the face covering. Even imposing sunnah salat is not justified, because even the Prophet PBBUH didn't impose it, but imposing Fardh Salah is totally justified.
Understand me, I'm for sharia, not against it
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is a claim you're making
Prove that hamas started the war, I challenge you, if it's true, it's easy
Israel started it at the night of October 6, they encircled the town of Hawara and killed alot of people, and at least 78 people were wounded, all unprovoked and only on civilians, it was done on the west bank that has no firearm, then the problems erupted, and if such an act was made in another country, it would've been worse
I know you westerners are very ignorant of facts, but not that much
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@amir_os754 see, it's very mixed and complicated. Iran wants israel to go because they know that if Israel is no longer a problem, then Iran will be one of, or even the single largest power in the middle east. Then, Iran wants to make the region more shia, rather than sunni, because that will secure their power for HUNDREDS OF YEARS if it got successful at making the peoples shia. If they were really concerned about muslims, they wouldn't have done all those bad things on our Syrian brothers and sisters. Another thing is that, yes, they actually have some problem with the fact that the land is no longer muslim, but this is for the clerical classes, not for the highest ruling elites. And finally, the problem also stems from the USA. Iran knows the USA is trying to overthrow the Iranian regime, and they know israel is America's proxy, so they don't want israel because it is a threat to Iran's stability
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JSM-bb80u lol, now you're defending fornication? I bet you cheat on every partner you get, because the law of stoning is applicable only to married adulterers, while beating is for the unmarried. Don't you believe that sex out of marriage causes decadence and social destruction? Well, we do, and that's it's legitimate. You think drugs are bad, even if the user wants it by his free will? We also think adultry is bad even if it was wanted. The only difference is that adultery's effects are very slowly seen, so they may not be noticed as drugs.
And about taliban, if the french can ban the freedom to clothing and covering, then taliban should also be able to ban the freedom to clothing and covering, right?
Plus, the law is for the public, not private areas, and public area laws are more legitimate than private.
I thought you'd bring me an economic or political argument, you gave me some aesthetic and socially subjective ones.
2
-
Americans, and actually most of the world hate immigrants because they mostly hate competition, they don't want anyone to out compete them at work, thus threatening their livelihood, opposing immigration is sign of weakness and irresponsibility or ignorance at best, a coward's act
This is a natural feeling, just like envy, so if you justify any government's act to limit immigration for the sake of numbers, fake relieve and short term comfort, you should also justify a man's tuking the life of his brother because both love the same girl. If this crime is also a natural feeling that should be suppressed, then opposing immigrants should also be suppressed. The fact that you don't feel their need doesn't make you right, just or less wrong, you don't necessarily own the country if you own the state or government
Besides, immigrants are very helpful for the economy, especially in the long-run. One simple example is that prices would fall with increase in supply relative to demand, among others
2
-
Americans, and actually most of the world hate immigrants because they mostly hate competition, they don't want anyone to out compete them at work, thus threatening their livelihood, protesting against immigration is sign of weakness and irresponsibility, a coward's act
This is a natural feeling, just like envy, so if you justify any government's act to limit immigration for the sake of numbers, you should also justify a man's mur---der of his brother because both love the same girl, if this crime is also a natural feeling that should be suppressed, then opposing immigrants should also be suppressed. The fact that you don't feel their need doesn't make you right or just, you don't necessarily own the country if you own the state or government
Besides, immigrants are very helpful for the economy, especially in the long-run. One simple example is that prices would fall with increase in supply relative to demand, among others
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@keomi6228 first of all, the ivy league example was one. There are surely other universities from around the western world. And these are only 3 points I pointed out, and there are surely other points too. Nevertheless, your additional points don't invalidate mine. So thank you for mentioning them
And those universities i mentioned them because the US doesn't allow these students, particularly if they where among the best of it, to go to countries like russia or iran, for example, anf there are alot of articles that were released that they are not even allowed to go to much weaker countries like Ethiopia and Nigeria. So, the argument is not about "Ive League," but about the US alliance.
And why are you saying "you didn't state the fact...?" Who said that I'm mentioning all the points, advantages, disadvantages, etc... I'm just stating 3 points that I'd like to point out. So, thank you again for the additional points.
And Finally, I recognise the fact that any country can develop its own arms industry, albiet much slowly of costly if they're not a US ally, but it's very much possible, and it mostly needs determination and honesty, which Egypt governments lacked since the 19th century. These are very corrupt countries (governments).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@randomperson9282 I will have to re-watch the video for all, but I'll just mention few biases he showed, he might not said that directly, but it seemed like he said that (indirectly)
First, that security and corruption concerns increased after the US withdrawal, which is proven to be wrong and actually opposite to most Afghans in Afghanistan
Second, that the taliban only thinks about it's interests above the public interests, this is a wrong idea anyone would get after watching this video. As it's known, former Afghan officials were too far from the public, while current Afghan officials are mostly rural, with deep connections to their societies, and they are more popular and respected by the public. They highly regard the public
Third, Taliban and ISIS are not similar, taliban doesn't attack civilians just because of their difference, while ISIS always did, they were never in a formal alliance in anyway, so what they do is not a coup, rather it's an act of stabilization, if isis sat peacefully, they won't be attacked and they can live as an organization in Afghanistan under the taliban
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Roland_Deschain even when you read about the hundreds of documented articles from al jazeera, orient tv, trt, independent Arabic medias and especially from syrians in aleppo and beyond, you know better documented things, ben is not more knowledgeable about what's in the arab world more than us, arabs. Just go to arab medias, literally +90% of the audience support the movement, because we know what happened in these 14 years, while you barely heard about the arab spring, 2015. (U know those black flag organisation) and then this one event, otherwise you definitely don't know why there's 12 million syrians outside.
1
-
@Roland_Deschain even when you read about the hundreds of documented articles from al jazeera, orient tv, trt, independent Arabic medias and especially from syrians in aleppo and beyond, you know better documented things, ben is not more knowledgeable about what's in the arab world more than us, arabs. Just go to arab medias, literally +90% of the audience support the movement, because we know what happened in these 14 years, while you barely heard about the arab spring, 2015 d@£$h and then this one event, otherwise you definitely don't know why there's 12 million syrians outside.
1
-
@Roland_Deschain even when you read about the hundreds of documented articles from al jazeera, orient tv, trt, independent Arabic medias and especially from syrians in aleppo and beyond, you know better documented things, ben is not more knowledgeable about what's in the arab world more than us, arabs. Just go to arab medias, literally +90% of the audience support the rebels, because we know what happened un these 14 years, while you barely heard about the arab spring, 2015 d@£$h occurances and then this one event, otherwise you definitely don't know why there's 12 million syrians outside.
1
-
@Roland_Deschain even when you read about the hundreds of documented articles from al jazeera, orient tv, trt, independent Arabic medias and especially from syrians in aleppo and beyond, you know better documented things, ben is not more knowledgeable about what's in the arab world more than us, arabs. Just go to arab medias, literally +90% of the audience support the rebels, because we know what happened un these 14 years, while you barely heard about the arab spring, 2015 d@£$h insurgency and then this one event, otherwise you definitely don't know why there's 12 million syrians outside.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
About Israel. Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
1
-
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
It's proven it was all Israel, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
@LilMissSmartyPants.922 no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
@nellymargolit this is a pure poor lie we all know, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
1
-
No, it was actually Israel who did it with proofs, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
And Israel started it all, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
Exactly, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
It was Israel with proofs, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
1
-
no, israel did it and with proofs, prove your points, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
it was actually Israel who did it with proofs, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Dreamer-0606 I'm tired at how they delete my replies 😭
if they'd really created h@m@$, I'd thank them for this. Resistance against colonialism is totally justified no matter its results, we had seen how the ANC indirectly caused the misery of thousands of South Africans while fighting for independence, since many were when the government tried to preserve its apartheid regime. And it's the same with g, a, z ,a, n, s, no one should resent the outcome of a struggle for justice, it's totally worth it and future generations will remember it
1
-
@ערןלבל honestly, you guys control everything, it's deleting all my replies when I say anything. And after controlling all this, you still want to go to another people to eliminate them
honestly, after all we've seen, most of the members of the IDF must get losing life punishment (using such terms to not be deleted) for not avoiding all these atrocities. But clearly you don't understand law, u only understand wrath of God. You didn't learn how God punished the jews after they oppressed Egyptians, how God punished them for 40 years after they refused to enter Jerusalem, how after they angered God after King Solomon with the babylonians, then after they tried to ** Jesus, and after all the stupidity since then?
You don't learn from your mistakes, I promise the end of Israhell's too close.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ion2960 it's not about what's after, but general informations about Qatar, for example, we always hear how European countries are Clean, safe, just, happy, socially just... But it is statistically proven that Qatar is cleaner than most European countries, as Britain & France, safer in terms of crimes rate, especially for women, lower suicide rates, lower divorce rate, more fiscally responsible government, less cancer levels (nothing to do with oil or gas money, but with the religion itself), and much more things that I'm sure you didn't know before. In fact, this is the case with all gulf countries
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tero2444 what? Actually a state built on a religious base is much more stable in law making, religion, at least mine, is well defined and no body can change it, since it is spread throughout many parts of the earth, and it is hard for anybody to change it. Democracy is built on fantasy and whims, when they want immigrants or not, when they declare war or not, when they deny LGBTQ or not, when they are communist or capitalist, when they are ethnocentrist or not, etc... All change with the change of popular belief. If a people want to commit crimes against another country for revenge (like how fascist Italy invaded ethiopia by popular support), nothing is wrong according to the democratic constitution, if it was made by a referendum, while religion has a well known strict line, that is not based on people's emotions, like the want to revenge
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry, this is long but worth reading it. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
First, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
Second, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
Third, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
Fourth, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
1
-
1
-
@canadiansfirst3636 the land of Jerusalem according to Islam was given to prophet abraham because he had the true religion, but after judaism started to be manipulated and God sending his messengers being denied like jesus, God punished jews by expelling them from the holy land and rejecting any state they would form. And now the true religion is Islam, so it belongs to it.
This is if we talked about religion, we will get stuck.
So, if we talked about history, then before 3000 years there was a Abraham and Israelite javob appeared before 2600 years, while cannanites and levantines appeared before 5000 years ago, who are thought to be some of the Palestinian ancestors and in property belonging, then Israel was made by expelling 800,000 Palestinian from their homes just in 1948 and they did more in the next 72 years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@teflerchina.2987 now look at yourself, you became like israelis, and all our replies are being deleted in favor of your narrative.
And what did you say?! That's the first thing you read you said???
14 years of oppression, millions of syrian refugees in europe and beyond, and all the news from all over syria coming to you, and this is your first thing to read you just said!
Ok, then you should learn, and it's only a matter of time until you dislike the syrian regime as well, you'd also have all the negative views to russia and iran, and know that their goals are all to control syria with an iron fist. Just read first, and then we'll talk.
God, did you surprised me
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@evano5635 you're trying to hide western countries crimes actually.
I didn't say these conflicts were good, and I would never say it. And BTW I'm an ethiopian.
And you can re read my comment. I said "a lesser problem doesn't justify a greater one", considering the fact that these problems made by Gaddafi caused more than a thousand to die in chad, while the civil war caused the death, missing and wounding of 100,000 libyan. If the west really wanted humanity, they really wanted to bring peace to libya they wouldn't have ruined libya and they would have brought peace in the first place.
But you can see the same thing here, when the iraqi president started to sell oil in other than the USD the war started, never before, not even when he invaded Kuwait. And the same thing happened here, when muammar wanted to sell the oil in other than the USD, and wanted Africa to have a universal currency, the war broke out. The Arab spring revolutions made it more aggressive
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fedbia2003 accidentally?! Lol, you don't know your politicians, you are clogged with US propagandas.
I, in fact, see taliban as liberators who don't have alot of experience, so they do alot of bad things accidentally, and some intentionally, that westerners don't like, but is part of the Afghan culture in general.
You don't accept those who are not like you, this is a colonial mindset, you are taught that anyone who don't believe in what you believe is bad. If he/she doesn't believe in democracy, liberalism, feminism, etc...
Just shut up, nobody needs you
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hamodalbatal464 first, millions, and is not accurate or reliable information since he didn't rely on researchs or doctrines.
Second, were killed, not only by Muslims but by hindu rivaling each other and muslims, and those millions (as he said, which is probably not accurate) are Muslims and non Muslims combined
Third, most of those who were killed where northern warriors, so they were Muslims under Muslims rule, not hindus as you are making taqiyas.
Forth, taqiya is haram in islam, but only shias use it because it is permitted to them because without taqiyas you can defeat shiism easily if you are educated about shiism. In sunni Islam it is considered hypocrisy and lie. Surrend, it's better for you
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hamodalbatal464 uhhh, stupid hater of islam speaking, what did I expect.
First, this verse as you read it was for the meccan pagans who broke the deal and killed muslim civilians which sparked a battle where Muslims won and conquered mecca, and before that Allah told them to kill or convert all of the polytheists only in mecca, because they were killing Muslims as i said. In islam, a murderer is executed, and killing Muslim civilians is like today killing a us citizen.
Second, banu quraiza were one of the 3 Jewish tribes under the rule of the prophet muhammad PBBUH (banu quraiza, banu qainuqa, banu al nadhir), but banu quraiza broke the deal (which stated that they won't ally with the meccan pagans against Muslims) and they killed many of the Muslim army which was preparing to fight meccan pagans because as I told you, they broke the deal and killed muslim civilians. So, it was a 2 betrayal on muslims at the same time. So, the prophet defeated this tribe and executed only the male warriors of banu quraiza (because women, sick people and children cannot be executed and they haven't done anything to be punished in the first place). The rest of banu quraiza and the 2 tribes lived in peace and the Muslim army won 2 battles in one run.
Did you understand? Only murderers are executed in islam, not civilians. We are not crusaders or zionists like you who love to kill innocent people
1
-
@hamodalbatal464 uhhh, stupid hater of islam speaking, what did I expect.
First, this verse as you read it was for the meccan pagans who broke the deal and killed muslim civilians which sparked a battle where Muslims won and conquered mecca, and before that Allah told them to kill or convert all of the polytheists only in mecca, because they were killing Muslims as i said. In islam, a murderer is executed, and killing Muslim civilians is like today killing a us citizen.
Second, banu quraiza were one of the 3 Jewish tribes under the rule of the prophet muhammad PBBUH (banu quraiza, banu qainuqa, banu al nadhir), but banu quraiza broke the deal (which stated that they won't ally with the meccan pagans against Muslims) and they killed many of the Muslim army which was preparing to fight meccan pagans because as I told you, they broke the deal and killed muslim civilians. So, it was a 2 betrayal on muslims at the same time. So, the prophet defeated this tribe and executed only the male warriors of banu quraiza (because women, sick people and children cannot be executed and they haven't done anything to be punished in the first place). The rest of banu quraiza and the 2 tribes lived in peace and the Muslim army won 2 battles in one run.
Did you understand? Only murderers are executed in islam, not civilians. We are not crusaders or zionists like you who love to kill innocent people
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alaskanbullworm5500 you can't tell me which part of my thoughts are the wrong thing.
My parents are basically u educated, and the only way they got me educated is by making us go to a well known private school, so they worked +12 hrs a day, 7 days a week, 350 days a year (only 14 free days), for 40 years years.
Today, we are considered from the upper middle class in Ethiopia, with 6000 ft² land in the capital city, a house, a car, a business in operation, and a plan to develop our land, so they we inherit greater wealth (which is a big concern for my father).
I believe you should be able to work hard, and you should be able to freely use your resources for your own good, this is the real way you can help the poor, not by excessive regulations or legislations that make the poor lazier, and thus poorer in the future
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnyoung4163 your justifying yours by the ottomans? And then, at the same time, saying the ottomans didn't do it.
If the police arresting you, essentially limiting your freedom (for good) is a crime, then any counter act is illegal.
By c#l#nialisጠ, I don't mean settling in here, come and settle, it's ok. But we mean that they came, took our properties, violated our rights, humiliated us, used us, etc... and all these were then inherited inter-generationally. The same is with , I hope they end up like SA, not like the native of america, such a tragedy. And you don't even feel any shame or guilt, you people don't have any conscience or morality, only double or multiple standards for every kind of human being.
1
-
@johnyoung4163 your justifying yours by the ottomans? And then, at the same time, saying the ottomans didn't do it.
If the police arresting you, essentially limiting your freedom (for good) is a crime, then any counter act is a crime.
By cዐl0nialisጠ, I don't mean settling in here, come and settle, it's ok. But we mean that they came, took our properties, violated our rights, humiliated us, used us, etc... and all these were then inherited inter-generationally. The same is with 🇵🇸, I hope they end up like SA, not like the native of america, such a tragedy. And you don't even feel any shame or guilt, you people don't have any conscience or morality, only double or multiple standards for every kind of human being.
1
-
@johnyoung4163 your justifying yours by the ottomans? And then, at the same time, saying the ottomans didn't do it.
If the police arresting you, essentially limiting your freedom (for good) is a crime, then any resistance is a crime.
By cዐl0nialisጠ, I don't mean settling in here, come and settle, it's ok. But we mean that they came, took our properties, violated our rights, humiliated us, used us, etc... and all these were then inherited inter-generationally. The same is with 🇵🇸, I hope they end up like SA, not like the native Americans, such a tragedy. And you don't even feel any shame or guilt, you people don't have any conscience or morality, only double or multiple standards for every kind of human being.
1
-
@johnyoung4163 your justifying yours by the ottomans? And then, at the same time, saying the ottomans didn't do it.
If the police arresting you, essentially limiting your freedom (for good) is a crime, then revolutions, resistance and opposition are crimes.
By colonialism, I don't mean settling in here, come and settle, it's ok. But we mean that they came, took our properties, violated our rights, humiliated us, used us, etc... and all these were then inherited inter-generationally. The same is with 🇵🇸, I hope they end up like SA, not like the native Americans, such a tragedy. And you don't even feel any shame or guilt, you people don't have any conscience or morality, only double or multiple standards for every kind of human being.
1
-
@johnyoung4163 no. After what I've seen happen to their people, never.
Btw, I'm not an Arab, but as an African, this is how my grandfathers fought for independence, and it's totally legitimate.
Colonizers living for generations would never legitimise their residence, let alone legitimising my eviction, discrimination, impoverishment, deprivation and suppression, mostly indirectly. The world won't recognise the legitimacy of a resistance or opposition force unless it wins. Believe it or not, Nelson Mandela, the first president of post-apartheid South Africa, was on the te**0*!$ተ list of the USA until 2008. A man who shouldn't have been considered any bad for any reason, except for causing reasonable civilian suffering.
1
-
@johnyoung4163 no. After what I've seen happen to their people, never.
Btw, I'm not an Arab, but as an African, this is how my grandfathers fought for independence, and it's totally legitimate.
Colonizers living for generations would never legitimise their residence, let alone legitimising my eviction, discrimination, impoverishment, deprivation and suppression, mostly indirectly. The world won't recognise the legitimacy of a resistance or opposition force unless it wins. Believe it or not, Nelson Mandela, the first president of post-apartheid South Africa, was on the te**0ri$ተ list of the USA until 2008. A man who shouldn't have been considered any bad for any reason, except for causing reasonable civilian suffering.
Resistance is a duty
1
-
@johnyoung4163 no. After what I've seen happen to their people, never.
Btw, I'm not an Arab, but as an African, this is how my grandfathers fought for independence, and it's totally legitimate.
Colonizers living for generations would never legitimise their residence, let alone legitimising my eviction, discrimination, impoverishment, deprivation and suppression, mostly indirectly. The world won't recognise the legitimacy of a resistance or opposition force unless it wins. Believe it or not, Nelson Mandela, the first president of post-apartheid South Africa, was on the terr0ri$ተ list of the USA until 2008. A man who shouldn't have been considered any bad for any reason, except for causing reasonable civilian suffering.
Resistance is a duty
1
-
@johnyoung4163 no. After what I've seen happen to their people, never.
Btw, I'm not an Arab, but as an African, this is how my grandfathers fought for independence, and it's totally legitimate.
Colonizers living for generations would never legitimise their residence, let alone legitimising my eviction, discrimination, impoverishment, deprivation and suppression, mostly indirectly. The world won't recognise the legitimacy of a resistance or opposition force unless it wins. Believe it or not, Nelson Mandela, the first president of post-apartheid South Africa, was on the te**0ri$ተ list of the USA until 2008. A man who shouldn't have been considered any bad for any reason, except for causing reasonable civilian casualties.
Resistance is a duty
1
-
@johnyoung4163 no. After what I've seen happen to their people, never.
Btw, I'm not an Arab, but as an African, this is how my grandfathers fought for independence, and it's totally legitimate.
Colonizers living for generations would never legitimise their residence, let alone legitimising my eviction, discrimination, impoverishment, deprivation and suppression, mostly indirectly. The world won't recognise the legitimacy of a resistance or opposition force unless it wins. Believe it or not, Nelson Mandela, the first president of post-apartheid South Africa, was on the terr0ri$ተ list of the USA until 2008. A man who shouldn't have been considered any bad for any reason, except for causing reasonable civilian casualties.
Resistance is a duty
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@masao2922 first, you talk as if morsi crippled egypt, when he actually only ruled for 8 months, and even that was with the military and police always disobeying the president. So he actually didn't rule, only sat on a fake throne controlled by the military.
Second, Christians mass@€£€d? You saw one really bad attack and then assumed it was morsi/muslim brotherhood, even when the Egyptian police proved it wasn't? Stop spreading fake news. And "all development ceased," bro that was because of the 2011 Revolution, we didn't even give the guy 1 proper year to judge him. Then saying churches and mosques were ... (i can't say the word) which churches and mosques got ... in the name of Allah under morsi, please. Which child was thrown by morsi? Don't tell me random crimes by people, just what morsi or the muslim brotherhood did. "Opened every prison" tell me which prison? The ones with political prisoners and journalists? Yes, even today every Egyptian should defend these poor prisoners, those who say one word on sisi and vanish. "People never wanted morsi," and then in another reply, tou say that Egyptians did indeed democratically elect morsi, you're contradictory. "And the military didn't want morsi," indeed, the people of Egypt got hijacked by the Egyptian military.
Oh, and I think you forgot the worst and greatest mass... in modern Egyptian history, even worse than that of Mohammed Ali of Egypt, the incident of Raba'a, of women, children, fathers, brothers, grandparents, etc...
Second, you say islamists corrupted islam?! Who are islamists? Isis or the muslim brotherhood or all the others, because there are variety of those people, some we condemn, some we love, some who are useless. And then you say that everyone subscribes to their ideas. What if some of their ideas are indeed true and good? You are in absolute blindness then. What you say is the definition of "extreme ..... ism," which is to absolutely refuse to even hear what the other party say, and consider it all false without a basic argument.
Third. What??!! Islamists control all the resources of egypt 😆 lol 😂.
After reading all this, I believe you're talking about muslims, not "islamists," because muslims indeed control 90% of Egyptian economy.
Fourth, the minister of education was appointed by your beloved hero, president el sisi. And that man is a new scam on egypt, he'll continue the government's project to worsen the educational system. Look at how many people are being failed because sisi couldn't improve the economy well in 11 years.
Abnormal inflation, debt crisis, poverty, high taxes, regulations, confiscations, surveillance, social under-funding, etc...
And after all this, you call yourself a devout muslim. I bet you pray the 5 prayers at this point.
1
-
@masao2922 first, you talk as if morsi crippled egypt, when he actually only ruled for 8 months, and even that was with the military and police always disobeying the president. So he actually didn't rule, only sat on a fake throne controlled by the military.
Second, Christians mass@€£€d? You saw one really bad attack and then assumed it was morsi/muslim brotherhood, even when the Egyptian police proved it wasn't? Stop spreading fake news. And "all development ceased," bro that was because of the 2011 Revolution, we didn't even give the guy 1 proper year to judge him. Then saying churches and mosques were ... (i can't say the word) which churches and mosques got ... in the name of Allah under morsi, please. Which child was thrown by morsi? Don't tell me random crimes by people, just what morsi or the muslim brotherhood did. "Opened every prison" tell me which prison? The ones with political prisoners and journalists? Yes, even today every Egyptian should defend these poor prisoners, those who say one word on sisi and vanish. "People never wanted morsi," and then in another reply, tou say that Egyptians did indeed democratically elect morsi, you're contradictory. "And the military didn't want morsi," indeed, the people of Egypt got hijacked by the Egyptian military.
Oh, and I think you forgot the worst and greatest mass... in modern Egyptian history, even worse than that of Mohammed Ali of Egypt, the incident of Raba'a, of women, children, fathers, brothers, grandparents, etc...
Second, you say islamists corrupted islam?! Who are islamists? Isis or the muslim brotherhood or all the others, because there are variety of those people, some we condemn, some we love, some who are useless. And then you say that everyone subscribes to their ideas. What if some of their ideas are indeed true and good? You are in absolute blindness then. What you say is the definition of "extremism," which is to absolutely refuse to even hear what the other party say, and consider it all false without a basic argument.
Third. What??!! Islamists control all the resources of egypt 😆 lol 😂.
After reading all this, I believe you're talking about muslims, not "islamists," because muslims indeed control 90% of Egyptian economy.
Fourth, the minister of education was appointed by your beloved hero, president el sisi. And that man is a new scam on egypt, he'll continue the government's project to worsen the educational system. Look at how many people are being failed because sisi couldn't improve the economy well in 11 years.
Abnormal inflation, debt crisis, poverty, high taxes, regulations, confiscations, surveillance, social under-funding, etc...
And after all this, you call yourself a devout muslim. I bet you pray the 5 prayers at this point.
1
-
@masao2922 first, you talk as if morsi crippled egypt, when he actually only ruled for 8 months, and even that was with the military and police always disobeying the president. So he actually didn't rule, only sat on a fake throne controlled by the military.
Second, Christians mass@€£€d? You saw one really bad attack and then assumed it was morsi/muslim brotherhood, even when the Egyptian police proved it wasn't? Stop spreading fake news. And "all development ceased," bro that was because of the 2011 Revolution, we didn't even give the guy 1 proper year to judge him. Then saying churches and mosques were ... (i can't say the word) which churches and mosques got ... in the name of Allah under morsi, please. Which child was thrown by morsi? Don't tell me random crimes by people, just what morsi or the muslim brotherhood did. "Opened every prison" tell me which prison? The ones with political prisoners and journalists? Yes, even today every Egyptian should defend these poor prisoners, those who say one word on sisi and vanish. "People never wanted morsi," and then in another reply, tou say that Egyptians did indeed democratically elect morsi, you're contradictory. "And the military didn't want morsi," indeed, the people of Egypt got hijacked by the Egyptian military.
Oh, and I think you forgot the worst and greatest masacre in modern Egyptian history, even worse than that of Mohammed Ali of Egypt, the incident of Raba'a, of women, children, fathers, brothers, grandparents, etc...
Second, you say islamists corrupted islam?! Who are islamists? Isis or the muslim brotherhood or all the others, because there are variety of those people, some we condemn, some we love, some who are useless. And then you say that everyone subscribes to their ideas. What if some of their ideas are indeed true and good? You are in absolute blindness then. What you say is the definition of "extremism," which is to absolutely refuse to even hear what the other party say, and consider it all false without a basic argument.
Third. What??!! Islamists control all the resources of egypt 😆 lol 😂.
After reading all this, I believe you're talking about muslims, not "islamists," because muslims indeed control 90% of Egyptian economy.
Fourth, the minister of education was appointed by your beloved hero, president el sisi. And that man is a new scam on egypt, he'll continue the government's project to worsen the educational system. Look at how many people are being failed because sisi couldn't improve the economy well in 11 years.
Abnormal inflation, debt crisis, poverty, high taxes, regulations, confiscations, surveillance, social under-funding, etc...
And after all this, you call yourself a devout muslim. I bet you pray the 5 prayers at this point.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Blah888 @Blah888 let's go again, my comment is being deleted, so I'll used wrong and twisted letters in some words. Like "f" means "v", ok 👍
1st, Muslims started to flow outside??? I think this is a language matter, not history
2nd, slafe industry?? Whatever, SLAfE TRADE to be honest with you, was even worse in india, just like how europeans called slaves "serfs", who were practically slafes.
And who said that slafery (we don't use this term Islamically, we use "riq", since we are all slafes of God) is the same everywhere? Slafery in Europe is human ownership often with no rights for slafes but life, slafery in islam is a mandated servitude with high protected rights, including 10 common rules for any slave to be free, other than the owner's permission. This is disregarding the fact that freeing a slafe is one of the most recommended things in islam, it's considered a charity. And even this slafery can happen only in certain ways, like we can't just take any weak person and call him a slafe, you actually have a whole set of rules of war to have rights over him, such as him being a prisoner of war or guilty of its crimes.
And finally, the indian economy didn't fall during mughal times, get your facts right. The indian economy's share of the global gdp started to fall for good.
First, the chinese economic growth was so great, and china reached its peak at the time with 35 percent of world's gdp.
Then, Europe, which was experiencing renaissance, then enlightenment, then industrial revolution, and let's not forget the colonisation of the Americas, which boosted their economies tremendously
And others, such as the Russian Empire, the ottoman empire, the persian empire, Africa's new empires rising, and so on and so forth.
So, the indian economy was doing great under muslim rule until the Europeans came, and the world was growing, which is a good thing. You want other peoples to starve?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
All the lies you're making are just unbelievable, I can't believe I was believing this channel so much, so long
Israel builds infrastructures because they take the lands surrounding it, if you saw Israel building a road next your land, then your land value would suddenly drop because the coming confiscation is inevitable
And Palestinians trained, as if it was an act of charity, you steal their lands, build your factory using taxes stolen from Palestinians, impoverish them to make them beg you for some economic help, and the use their labour for your good, and finally show yourself as the good guy.
Nice try
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yvelf the facts? What are the facts? With all respect to Americans, you think that the US government is sending this aid to help Palestinians out of their goodness?! Only idiots think this way
The US government is sending this aid for 2 reasons
First, to help the PLO in crushing any future intifada or revolution and keep the government on American and Israeli side (why do you think the PLO is more tolerant to Israel than h@m@s?)
Second, to extend influence, as we can see how the PLO is integrating socially unaccepted educations, regardless of my personal views, like passive ideas to undermine resistance against colonialism, to normalize gender roles, feminism, and the numerous gender types, and many other public services being controlled
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
dougaldouglas8842 ok, Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
Let me add another one, in 1996, israel bombarded a Lebanese village and killed hundreds of Lebanese refugees in UN refugee camp, and Israel claimed it was an "accidental" missile from the Lebanese Opposition, and that they were innocent, until after months, when the UN concluded in an investigation that it was actually an Israeli airstrike, and Israel never denied it after that. They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Plus, they said it was from "IJM", how could they discover that it wasn't from "Qassam"? Just shows you the extent of the lie
5FIFTH, they've just added a lie saying the building wasn't hit from above in the first place, after they claimed it was hit from above by h*m*s at first. You can even watch the video taken at the time of explosion, and hear the sound of the airstrike falling down, it's a heavy and fast object's movement sound.
6SIXTH, the IDF has uploaded a voice claiming it was from h*m*s, and regardless of the content, please, go and analyse the video using a sound editing app, then change the voices from right to left, you'll see that when you hear the right, you listen to people talking and on the left you hear nothing, it's like two people talking face to face, not via call, so it's a pure poor lie. Lying again and again very unprofessionally
This is their 4th consecutive lie only about the hospital incident in 24 hours, only a liar changes narratives so fast and this much
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry, this is long but worth reading it. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
First, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
Second, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
Third, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
Fourth, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pavolkrajcik7675 Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
@bayani7626 Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
1
-
@ramrocker1004 Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
@Deadassbruhfrfr this is a lie with evidences
The video is not verified, plus Gaza looks very ok here, and with electricity all over the streets, this isn't the case now, so the video is FAKE
Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
1
-
Sorry, this is long but worth reading it, please debunk my claims. Israel actually bombarded the hospital with some evidences, while there's no ONE evidence it was from Gaza
1FIRST, Hananya Neftali said it was from the IDF intentionally made on the hospital claiming "it was being used by h*m*s" on X, as he's an IDF official, he mostly saw the attack being launched by his own eyes. Then the Israeli official, Colonel Jonathan Conricus, said that it was done "unintentionally" by the IDF, and lastly the Israeli PM lied about it, too many lies stricking at once
2SECOND, israel has long record of lying about their crimes, just last year when they killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh, they lied and said "she was killed by Palestinian gunmen", only to be denied months later (when everyone forgot about it) and say that she was "accidentally" killed by IDF soldiers, who won't get tried according to the Israeli government. That's just last year on one incident, while they lied many times during the previous war on Gaza, evictions of Palestinians from their homes, etc...
They lie alot, then why wouldn't they lie now?
3THIRD, y'all can see that H*m*s never had an explosive like this when their missiles strike their targets, they barely destroy half a villa, that's not even a structural damage. H*m*s is too weak to produce such missiles, and from the tens (if not hundreds) of missiles that come from Gaza, non had such ability. While at the same time we can see Israel making even greater damages on buildings in Gaza, almost every single time they strike, shows you that this is the regular explosive Israel uses.
4FOURTH, how did they know it was "accidental" attack from Gaza? Shows that they have just engineered this abhorrent official lie. How could they tell it was accidental from a territory they couldn't even expose a great attack coming from, and how could they investigate it in less than 4 hours??!! Just shows you the extent of the lie
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@delnamartinfrancis first, we all know that the water belongs to Gazans but is controlled by Israel, so cutting off the water is like imprisoning a child for his brother's crime
Second, even if h@m@s dedicated its efforts for desalination, do you know that Israel is the one who refuses it? Yes, israel has a say in it, and Israel claimed that it might be used for terrorism. In fact, air is also used by terrorists
Third, I know you don't know that h@m@s actually developed the water pipelines, and they never used it for arms, they used Israeli pipes that were discovered stealing water from Gaza civilians, and h@m@s as their national army had the responsibility to dismantle this crime.
Please, reply to these 3 points I made
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@seneca983 yeah, mostly it's only known by us, arabs, how extremely unfaithful abd evil our politicians are. MBS is a comparatively young ruler, he studied some time in the US and got influenced by it, he's power and money hungry, and he's very delusional, as you know, with his neom city and other projects. So, such kind of people are the worst, and what else do we expect from them?
And btw, the quote about MBS was from a new book, i think it's called "war," and it was in a talk between MBS and Anthony Blinken in a kinda secret meeting
1
-
@Boababa-fn3mr I think you're not taking what I said seriously. After all, the people are the source of power, if the people revolt, you might lose the throne or at least make a alot of concessions.
And in the cases of egypt, Lebanon, Tunisia, etc... it's not about ruling dynasties, but ruling individuals, and individuals come from the common people, which means that if the common people have a negative perception of, say Israel, the next leaders are very much likely to also have negative perceptions of Israel, and those future leaders also take into considerations the public perception.
In conclusion, public perception is important, and the masses dictate the future no matter what, and the only way to protect one's throne is by changing public perception, not ignoring it, which is what arab leaders are doing, and which is why any normalisation with israel is at high risk of long term failure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@worfoz 1, the original quran still is present and every time we answer you, you still keep making fake claims, the quran that i will use now
2, Muhammad PBBUH is mentioned in quran 4 times by name, and more but not exactly by name: 2:144, 33:40, 48:29 and 47:2 and aloso another verse where his name is Ahmed (which is his 2nd name)
3, there are many stories about the prophet PBBUH in the quran, like the night of journey the most well known story and many others you can just Google it
4, and the quran is full of teachings and it is the first reference and source of knowledge about islam even more than hadiths
Actually, your debate is weaker than most people attacking Islam. All of them have weak debates, but yours is very weak. Im sure you follow apus and wood channels
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@unknownservers3420 not everyone claiming prophecy is a prophet, but not every one claiming his a prophet is a liar. We never believed in the prophet PBBUH just because he asked us to do it, but also because he had prophesies and had good administration and was a good man, as well as being a descendant of a prophet and many other factors.
And the aksumite king you talked about was also prophesied by the prophet that the king was a wise and fair ruler, but his successors were not, and they raided trade ships of the people of the Rashidun caliphate in the red sea (whether muslims or non), so the caliph ordered to raid their port so they stop, and that happened. And about mahdists, they invaded abysinian lands because Ethiopians were working with their enemies and muslims in Northern ethiopia asked for help as most of them were forced to convert by tewodros and yohannes, later by minilik and had good times in reign of lij iyasu but not for too long for reasons you know, and again bad times at time of haile Selassie, in fact in the time of Derg, muslims were allowed for the first time to own new lands, so about adal, it was an ethiopian vassal ifat but they didn't like and invaded ethiopia
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DM5550Z many arab countries realised?! Peace?!
First, as we can see, that occupying state (i can't say its name) doesn't want peace, except to further its ambitions. Why are you so delusional, or perhaps just trying to fool others.
Second, arab governments realised that if they want to protect their thrones from democracy, they have to ally with the west, rather than allying with their peoples. The alliance between the occupying state and arab governments is just a consolidation of autocracy, which the west prefers, because you know what? Because everytime democracy comes to us, we elect islamists or semi/hybrid-islam ists, and they win sweeping majorities every single time, and that's why the west deliberately fund our submissive autocratic regimes, rather than our ambitious and assertive democratic regimes. I'm sure you as a westerner minded person also hate democracy coming to the middle east because you know we are even better civilizational rivals than China, if we got equal opportunity.
Peace with the occupation isn't an option, because simply, occupiers doesn't want it. Not even a 2 state solution. They only want occupier mind people like the current ruler of the UAE, unlike his more assertive father.
We are being sold for the thrones of our rulers, we shall overthrow them soon and these occupiers shall never see peeec.
1
-
1
-
@DM5550Z many arab countries realised?! Peace?!
First, as we can see, is real doesn't want peace, except to further its ambitions. Why are you so delusional, or perhaps just trying to fool others.
Second, arab governments realised that if they want to protect their thrones from democracy and revolutions, they have to ally with the west, rather than allying with their peoples. The alliance between israel and the arab governments is just a consolidation of autocracy, which the west prefers, because you know what? Because everytime democracy comes to us, we elect islamists or semi/hybrid-islamists, and they win sweeping majorities every single time, and that's why the west deliberately fund our submissive autocratic regimes, rather than our ambitious and assertive democratic regimes. I'm sure you as a westerner minded person also hate democracy coming to the middle east because you know we are even better civilizational rivals than China, if we got equal opportunity.
Peace with the occupation isn't an option, because simply, zionists doesn't want it. Not even a 2 state solution. They only want zionists like the current ruler of the UAE, unlike his more assertive father.
We are being sold for the thrones of our rulers, we shall overthrow them soon and zionists shall see no peec.
1
-
@DM5550Z many arab countries realised?! Peace?!
First, as we can see, is real doesn't want peace, except to further its ambitions. Why are you so delusional, or perhaps just trying to fool others.
Second, arab governments realised that if they want to protect their thrones from democracy and revolutions, they have to ally with the west, rather than allying with their peoples. The alliance between israel and the arab governments is just a consolidation of autocracy, which the west prefers, because you know what? Because everytime democracy comes to us, we elect islamists or semi/hybrid-islamists, and they win sweeping majorities every single time, and that's why the west deliberately fund our submissive autocratic regimes, rather than our ambitious and assertive democratic regimes. I'm sure you as a westerner minded person also hate democracy coming to the middle east because you know we are even better civilizational rivals than China, if we got equal opportunity.
Peace with the occupation isn't an option, because simply, zionists doesn't want it. Not even a 2 state solution. They only want zionists like the current ruler of the UAE, unlike his more assertive father.
We are being sold for the thrones of our rulers, we shall overthrow them soon and zionists shall see no peec.
1
-
1
-
Americans, and actually most of the world hate immigrants because they mostly hate competition, they don't want anyone to out compete them at work, thus threatening their livelihood, opposing immigration is sign of weakness and irresponsibility or ignorance at best, a coward's act
This is a natural feeling, just like envy, so if you justify any government's act to limit immigration for the sake of numbers, fake relieve and short term comfort, you should also justify a man's taking the life of his brother because both love the same girl. If this crime is also a natural feeling that should be suppressed, then opposing immigrants should also be suppressed. The fact that you don't feel their need doesn't make you right, just or less wrong, you don't necessarily own the country if you own the state or government
Besides, immigrants are very helpful for the economy, especially in the long-run. One simple example is that prices would fall with increase in supply relative to demand, among others
1
-
Americans, and most of the world hate immigrants because they mostly hate competition, they don't want anyone to out compete them at work, thus threatening their livelihood, protesting against immigration is sign of weakness and irresponsibility, a coward's act
This is a natural feeling, just like envy, so if you justify any government's act to limit immigration for the sake of numbers, you should also justify a man's murder of his brother because both love the same girl, if this crime is also a natural feeling that should be suppressed, then opposing immigration should also be suppressed just like opposing immigration, just because you don't feel empathy for those migrants, that doesn't mean your act is just in anyway
1
-
@shaycormac3219 this is for the 10th time, edited.
Africa is harmed by aids more. Aids are used to keep authoritarians in power, make us dependant on foreigners, avoid revolutions and change, and by only aiding friendly governments, we are kept poor systematically. Aids are bad to our agricultural and industrial sectors, they distort the economy, and they make the westerners, like you, expect our thanks and worship.
Did we aid western governments when you revolted? Now stop sending us if you want us to free ourselves independently, it'll take time to stabilise ourselves and grow after revolutions, but it's for our greater long term good.
1
-
@sabrinarodrigues629 this is for the 5th time.
Africa is harmed by aid more. Aids are used to keep authoritarians in power, make us dependant on foreigners, avoid revolutions and change, and by only aiding friendly governments, we are kept poor systematically. Aids are fatal to our agricultural and industrial sectors, they distort the economy, and they make the westerners, like you, expect our thanks and worship.
Did we aid western governments when you revolted? Now stop us if hou want us to free ourselves independently, it'll take time to stabilise and grow after revolutions, but it's for the greaer long term good.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Megalomaniakaal first, I don't mean those microchips that aren't used for the sophisticated military equipments, but that highly advanced ones. And the us lacks the necessary skilled workers and technologies to make it independently by itself, but once this tsmc monopoly is over, Taiwanese workers would lose their jobs, or at least get paid less, the company will still make huge profits, but certainly much less, and Taiwan wouldn't be relevant as it is now internationally
Second, I didn't say that the US will completely dump Taiwan, especially since Taiwan is an important ally in a strategic geographical position, but there would be less incentives to spend trillions to protect Taiwan, in a potentially bloody war with China
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yousef Dessouki well, if what you're saying is true, then Egypt is in a great era, destruction of mosques made me very upset but i hope everything will get better.
You know many things about Egypt, but if you can answer my questions about the bridges built in a crazy way will it be fixed, and houses of poor people which is destroyed, the increased cost of bread, the medical situation, ethiopian dam, involving in Libyan war, egypts mediterranean rights and human rights issues
I know it's too much questions and you might not know its answers but it's ok cuz your not the vice president to know all of those things
As well the palaces of England are from the monarchical period and the current palaces are run by the Queens salary and incomes from tourists who visits the palace and castles, but not state's or national money
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1