Comments by "Far Rider" (@farrider3339) on "The Spectator" channel.

  1. As I understood Zizek, he precisely referred to this point. Assange only published the documents stolen by others.
    5
  2. The one thing raising my deep suspicion : WHERE are those Palestinians proclaiming to neither agree with Hamas regency over the last 16 yrs in Gaza, nor with their terror over their own people and Israel ? I haven't heard single voice from that direction.
    2
  3.  @josephfredbill  yes. Those nitpickish details. True, journalists usually are damn uncritical when choosing the terms. Zizek intervened and tried to make the difference clear. Albeit I must say, here we enter the field jurisdiction. A judge only has sufficient qualifications to say which is applicable here. Us observers, only can use common sense. And as the proverb goes: Justice got noting to do with just (in the sense of fairness). Hope your will to live is well restored;) Assange is a direct beacon to weaknesses and the hypocrisy the entire system works with. Ideolgies nobody believes in.
    1
  4. The US more and shows traces of a totalitarian regimes and so do his brainwashed citizens. Trumpism is a marker for a declining demo.crazy. Why do US Americans refer to a vain figure like Trump as to sustain their hypocritical identity ? Why ?
    1
  5. It could be even worse by a yes but 🙄
    1