General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Dima S
The Telegraph
comments
Comments by "Dima S" (@dimas3829) on "Putin promises ‘immediate’ ceasefire if Ukraine drops Nato bid I Ukraine: The Latest, Podcast" video.
Blackrock won't tolerate exposing what it does inside Ukraine, though. No sponsorship for the channel will ensue.
20
he absoultely is in position ot make demands since UKraine is horribly losing, duh.
14
@dancahill9585 Ukraine independance ended in 2014 when US (which promised Ukraine independance in 1991) wrecked such by illegal coup. From that point there is no sovereign state of UKraine anymore and no trust to the Americans breaking their signatures at their will.
9
there would be no next invasion as far as neigbours don't threaten Russia.
9
Ukraine had no manpower nor vehicles to continue as is. Russia is winning and decimating Ukrainian troops, so it's a given that Putin would ask for more terrritories now. Also no, in return Ukraine will get guarantees of peaceful existing, not jsut Putin word. Nuances ca be discussed further, the most important question is rather would Rada agree on those terms or not. The Urkainian illegitimate dictator's opinion on the issue is, of course, irrelevant.
7
he has upper hand so he can make demands, that's a given on negotiation table. If Ukraine would take over 1/4 of Russia - it would be legit in making demands instead, duh.
4
cause Ukraine is suplied by 40 NATO countries, duh.
4
@TheMarlinspike mistake of NATO creeping on Russia steadily, breaking promise of not elargmenet, eh? Also, Washington Post though that not Putin. Putin used advancement towards Kiev as bargaining chip for first negotiations which would work if not for BJ forcing Kiv to fight to the last Ukrainian instead.
4
it is end to active bloodshed. Russia and Japan (form the times of ww2) are still technically at war too.
4
@Stirlingshirecastle winning position is when your opponent on the brink of collapse, which Ukraine absolutely is. Wrecked infrastructure, economy on life-support, not enough vehicles OR manpower, rapid corruption eating up at any fortification effort, allies with depleted arsenals, etc. We can see Ukrainian despeartion in the form of firefighters and paramedica beaten up into cosncritption. Compare the situation with Russia one and maybe you'd stop being delusional.
3
they do laugh at beggar Zelensky.
2
considering 150 million poopulation - it will take Russia... 500 years to cease to exist if those casualties are true, lmao.
2
yeah, more like to 2040s.
2
the demands are dictated by the winning side, though. Ukraine will pay.
2
@Maja-Danmark cope harder, it's never gonna happen
2
@D.D.-ud9zt Russia didn't conquer Ukraine yet, though. It would be a hassle to prolong the war, so Russia isn't against achieving what it wants without further bloodshed from both sides. Ya know, the same reason US didn't land invade Japanese home islands despite clearly winning against Japaneese.. and yes, nuclear option is on the table this time too.
1
peace conference without the other side being represented? Lmao. Either way, North Korea will never kneel to the degenerate west and Russia will keep on hoing equal partnet to China, providing each other with goods.
1
@A4Natty Ukirane is Russia's home, though.
1
tsk,tsk,tsk. As if Ukraine would be allowed to escape the grip of Blackrock. The colonies of the west exist to feed it, not to be sovereign states.
1
Crimeans will not give back what was stolen by Ukraine from them, duh.
1
@milesnixon9554 Russia plead to become NATO member for a long time and was constantly rejected cause it's main NATO's target.
1
no one can be, that's hwat negotiations are for, duh.
1
@ScottishAtheist like it did under Elcin? Lmao. Delusional westerners are my favourite.
1
@stevensanto5934 Just look up how many things in Ukraine are owned by Blackrock at this point. Their own country doesn't belong to them. Zelesnky pretty much agreed on the Russian peacedeal in Turkey, then BJ comes and everyone signing the deal from Ukraine's side starts to either being executed as "Russian agents" or outright mysteriously die Mi-5 style, I wonder why. Russia population backs up Putin's decision, though, if anything, the question they have to him is why he didn't directly interfere in 2014 when it would be quite easier to dismantle Ukrainian military. 8 years of diplomacy is overall seen as wasted opportunity, especially after Merkel and Sholtz exposing that Ukraine was forced by the western coutnries to lie and don't follow the Minsc promises - which if held would lead to the Donbass region reintegration into Ukraine as autonomous region of such with total Russian support.
1
it will bring time to better prepare, to deal with sustained damage, to give opportunity of refugeese to return, etc. Yes, it will give lots of things to Russia too, but overall it would be mutually beneficial for both states.. hence west can't allow it to happen.
1
@jeffree9015 last against what exactly? Ten times less of Ukrainian artillery? Russia still have reserves while Ukraine doesn't.
1
@eraldorh very funny. Ukrainian civil war will beocme more blody if Russia just goes out of Ukraine, duh.
1
@UNSKIALzPSN yeah, it's not like illegal coup in Ukraine was organised by the west, uhuh.
1
Ukraine is on the verge fo collapse. If it doesn't start to negotiate with Russia - there will be no Ukraine.
1
a cost of winning? Lmao.
1
only after USA gets out of it.
1
@richardwilson57 exactly, but then again - Belarus tried that and was quite benefitting from that.. before the evil west tried to coup them too, violently turning into puppet and when it failed - sanctioned the country for the audacity of keeping it's sovereignity.
1
@prajwal1341 the problem is that US didn't allow for Ukraine to rhink for itself. The puppet state intalled by 2014th illegal coup is in the hands of America with the sole purpose of being turned into colony of blackrock while crushing everyone not submitting to their corporate overlords - towards russian minefields.
1
guarantees on both sides can be discussed furhter on. The most important part is ageeing on the points made.
1
yes
1
nope, initial treaty was much more beneficial for Urkaine. Russia would only keep Crimea and even it was a matter of change, for international referendum to occur there in 20 years. The rest of territories would go to Ukraine, while it would still not join NATO.
1
@philliptemple9841 because BJ forced them not to, though the conditions were much milder and in Ukraine's favour at the time. After all, Russia is winning, so the current conditions are much harsher.
1
@A4Natty yes, as well as US gave it's word for this too, yet in 2014 US led an illegal coup, wrecking Ukraine, so there was no meaningful reason for Russia to keep it towards de-facto American puppet, duh.
1
he foesn't care so much that he promoses peace which would end the bloodhsed, uhuh.
1
he does, because they are already crumbling and that decision would lead to less bloodshed. After all, ddue to population decline Russia is interested in young Ukrainians being alive maybe even more thant Ukraine does.
1
Ukrainian civil war wouldn't, duh.
1
delusional. Ukrain has no bargain chips on it's hand.
1
@lord_scrubington because only doing so Ukraine can survive as a state? They have no future if they refise to negotiate with a clear victor.
1
unless Ukrane cares about it's future generations since country is it's people not the land they live on.
1
they gettin well-paid, their families are getting priveleges, their effort is strenghtening their country, they are volonteers-lonly forse in comparison to beaten into cosncription Ukrainian one, etc. So yes, they want to be there,
1
ironic, considering how much blood is on Zelensky's hands.
1