Comments by "michael" (@michaeld4861) on "Justice Jackson raises a red flag on the idea of a president with no legal liability " video.

  1.  @jennifertate4397  Delay and usher in fascism and possibly declaring Trump god-king.
    5
  2. Lawyer: "He's got complete immunity." Justice: "So what's stopping him from doing whatever he wants laws be damned?" Lawyer: "The laws." What? But you just said the laws don't apply to him. If he's got complete immunity why would he respect the laws or congress or anything else? What's to stop him from merking anyone trying to use the law to stop him or any supreme court member who votes against him? What are you going to do, charge him with a crime? He's got immunity, remember. Why are we even listening to this dunce? Seems like the supreme court is just trying to grant immunity but is publically coordinating their argument with this absolute bird brain of a lawyer.
    1
  3. Why are we even asking Trumps lawyer what the law should be? I don't get it. Constitution specifically details we have a president that is not above the law. No immunity for any actions, president or not. But it's painfully obvious that the rightwing supreme court members are trying their best to figure out Trump's lawyers argument so they can find a way to support it.
    1