Comments by "Cyberfunk" (@cyberfunk3793) on "Putin's red lines: How serious are his threats this time around? | DW News" video.

Even if true, so what? West has full right to help Ukraine in its self defence by all possible means.
4
@trodent83 All that is allowed under international law and the right to aid in self defence, unlike invading other countries which ru is doing.
3
@jianyang6281 Because it's the one invading another country, you are really dense enough to ask that question?
2
@Bushings.78 With comedian you mean Lavrov and Putin?
1
@Mirel_RO Cope harder, NATO made it their business and have full right to do so.
1
@trodent83 They are missiles and not rockets. We can say the exact same thing about the missiles ru receives from iran and nk. International law fully allows US and other countries to even directly attacks ru in this situation, because it's in the aid of their self defense, so you are wrong on that also.
1
@trodent83 Directly attacking a country after it has attacked another one is obviously fully justified in UN charter article 51. "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security." It doesn't matter if they consider it an act of war, it's totally legal to attack the original aggressor on its own territory.
1
@trodent83 Did you graduate elementary school? You don't understand what "collective" means? It means Ukraine or anyone helping it. Your logic is the same as saying if someone attacks a person, other people can't hit the attacker to make them stop 🤦‍♂
1
@trodent83 What?? 😂 Collective in the article obviously means that the victim can defend itself alone or with the help of anyone else. Are you truly desperate enough to try to spin it here, that is the script your boss gave you? 🤣
1
@trodent83 Secondly, I don't care what your side considers fair game.
1
@trodent83 I'm hoping for you to do something.
1
@trodent83 So we can end the war
1
@trodent83 and the country that started it.
1
@trodent83 Was that some poor attempt at parody? Are you intentionally trying to make ru look bad? The article has nothing to do with defensive contracts or alliances, they are OBVIOUSLY irrelevant so don't know why anyone would even try to bring them up.
1
@trodent83 "Just as it is up to me to say I do not want my country get involved" Your country is who started this, don't think anybody believes you aren't from ru.
1
@trodent83 You don't have any arguments, you have you lying about what the word "collective" means in the UN charter. Anybody over the age of 12-years-old can self see that by a little bit of Googling.
1
@trodent83 Lying about what "collective" means in the UN charter doesn't make an argument.
1
@andrewglynn1982 You think ru has something that is best in the world? 😂 Main exports are ladies of the night and weapons that don't work. And who cares about some Minsk paper after the Budapest memorandum from 1994 that ru violated? No paper signed with ru means anything.
1