Comments by "Fenrirthewolf" (@fenrirthewolf5417) on "Why Are American Troops in Ukraine? - Russian Roulette (Dispatch 108)" video.

  1. Do you know these soldiers? America has been in a constant state of war for the past hundred years. And you are saying that a bunch of national guardsmen who were fighting Russian back rebels on equal level are as skilled as American special forces.
    7
  2. LibertarianSoldier1 sorry your right. After looking again I also didn't see any combat patches. But I didn't see to many privates there. Most of what I had seen were corporals and up, but that's just me.
    1
  3. Kyle that's bullshit. The president can send any force within any branch anywhere. The president mainly uses marines because marines have lots of expeditionary units on boats ready to go to war at anytime. So it may take a month to organize the army for an invasion, while it would take a few days to get the marines to do it.
    1
  4. Here's the difference! America is not a conscripted army now. We have drones, decades of anti-terror and rebel fighting experience. And a well trained all volunteer force. The only thing that stopped us from winning Vietnam was the pussy liberal faggots that forced us out of a war we were winning. And the same can be said for all our wars, and including this if it comes to that.
    1
  5. Uh who cares?
    1
  6. Marc Ariss please tell me your Russian so I can understand why you are so ignorant.
    1
  7. No offense but I seen very few privates in the group of soldiers. Most of them were sergeant and up in rank.
    1
  8. But the difference is America doesn't have much to teach the Ukrainians. American trainers are there primarily to teach a country how to use OUR weapons we give to them effectively. But with out weapons it's pointless to even have trainers.
    1