Comments by "wily wascal" (@wilywascal2024) on "Why GOP candidates are still embracing Trump's election lie" video.

  1. Why hasn't Merrick Garland and his DOJ not yet arrested and charged Trump, Jeffery Clark, Mark Meadows, John Eastman and any other accomplices for their involvement in federal election interference and sedition??? WTF? How much more evidence is needed? If Garland doesn't stand up for justice and democracy, this nation is soon doomed. 18 U.S. Code § 595 - Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments "Whoever, being a person employed in any administrative position by the United States, or by any department or agency thereof, or by the District of Columbia or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or by any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States, or any political subdivision, municipality, or agency thereof, or agency of such political subdivision or municipality (including any corporation owned or controlled by any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States or by any such political subdivision, municipality, or agency), in connection with any activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, uses his official authority for the purpose of interfering with, or affecting, the nomination or the election of any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." Disqualification form Holding Office, U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment, Section 3.1.1 "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
    1
  2.  @D...M...A...  ~ The AG and the DOJ are dragging their feet, trying not to appear political. But appearances shouldn't matter, because justice and enforcing the law come first, and because Republicans have been painting him and the DOJ as political, anyway. Appearances shouldn't prevent the DOJ from doing its job. Garland has already made a number of unwise decisions regarding the former administration, and the decision to prosecute Bannon holding him in contempt of Congress should not have taken weeks to decide. Bannon's hearing on that charge won't happen until July 2022. The clock is ticking, and in about a week it will have been a year since the January 6 insurrection, and still none of the major players have been indicted yet. Nor is there any sign of the DOJ prosecuting Trump for his other crimes. That's far too long, and it is sending the wrong message to those trying to subvert our democracy. "If the result of Garland's de-politicization is tiptoeing around the egregious serial wrongdoing of the leaders of the Republican Party, then his efforts will have exactly the opposite of the intended effect. By failing to hold Trump and Co. accountable, Garland will set the stage for them to continue unabated their efforts to turn the U.S. into a one-party state in which only Republicans can win elections and any tactics they may use to hold on to power will have been effectively validated by the inaction of Garland and his DOJ. Garland’s behavior to date has left me apprehensive. Conversations I have had with folks inside DOJ have not eased those concerns. There, frustration with Garland begins with his management style (which insiders liken to that of a judge running his chambers in which his office is a kind of bubble apart from the department and staffed by a small team akin to the clerks he had when he was in the judiciary). It extends to concerns that he will err too far in the name of caution and a desire not to be perceived as political. This too is a hold-over from his court days and ignores that A) he is a political appointee, B) the issues he is dealing with are hyper-politicized and c) there is no way to prosecute politicians for crimes committed in the name of partisanship without appearing political."
    1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1