Comments by "lord most high" (@Poorlineforeva) on "'It is a stunt': Keith Pitt accuses Labor's nuclear transition modelling a 'political attack'" video.

  1. He'll have to ask homer Simpson or well done Angus.
    4
  2. Keith pitt is full of shitt
    2
  3. You just don't know what you're talking about. The CSIRO and AEMA do and they're not trying to get re elected.
    1
  4. They say lots of things when you buy second hand cars too. Only a fool believes the salesman.
    1
  5. 80 years isn't much compared to the 100s of thousands of years of storing waste and obsolete reactors.
    1
  6.  @bjorn1583  you can't know what they will run on until someone actually finishes building one. Australia doesn't want any anyway. Why don't you have a referendum and find out?
    1
  7.  @grannyannie2948  you realise it doesn't produce electricity?
    1
  8. Because they don't exist so they can make up the figures and alleged benefits.
    1
  9. At least he didn't change the law to hide the price increases like Angus Taylor did. You skytards need to let go of your $275. like Abbott's promised $550 reduction it won't happen. Neither did the $100 lamb roasts or the "back in black " surplus.
    1
  10. Absolute bullshit. Where do you get your figures?
    1
  11. ​ @dfor50 go have a look at Chernobyl.
    1
  12. We also don't have the manufacturing capability or workforce for nuclear. It's just a pipe dream to delay replacing fossil fuels. The old people who watch sky don't seem to realise this. Nuclear seems to be a bit of a penis substitute for skytards.
    1