Comments by "Richard Clifton" (@richardclifton4120) on "Special counsel indicts Trump again in election interference case" video.

  1.  @frogslat4579  Being illegally appointed and wasting Tax money with an "UNLIMITED" budget and nothing to back his charges up with. He has already been ruled illegitimate as a "Special Prosecutor" by a judge, but he is still wasting more money that taxpayers pay for. You may not even pay taxes, but if you do, you are supporting waste. "for? For hurting your feelings? For upholding the law in face of a powerful wealthy and influential person? This is what you all ask for but cry when it’s “your” guy."
    2
  2. Kangaroo Courts don't count. That was one of the most ridiculous cases that was ever made public. Imagine you were a defendant in that same court with a Prejudiced Judge whose family (daughter) is making money off of it and then say what you said again. If you still agree with the verdict, you deserve what is coming your way.
    1
  3. You've been conditioned by the Democrats to not look into anything, but you just agree with the consensus that what they say is true. If they are telling you the truth, how many votes has Kamala Harris received for the position she is running for? How was Harris raised? Where was Harris raised? What is her record in California? How many people did she keep in jail to use as free labor for the state? How many murderers were released by her so they could commit the same crime again? You mention "Republican Dictator, yet you aren't watching Harris and all her proposals are you? She thinks everyone should own the same thing even if they don't work for it, but that is Socialism, and she was raised a Marxist. So if a Republican Dictator is what you fear, why is it that President Trump didn't do that when he had the opportunity, but Harris is allowing an invasion, and you say nothing about it? Your little diatribe is ridiculous and one of the many that show you have no idea what you are talking about.
    1
  4.  @CloneGeneral  Now you are questioning a judge's ruling? I guess you graduated from Law School too?
    1
  5.  @frogslat4579  Watch out, you have been convinced there isn't a door in front of you blocking the truth, but you will run into that same door again and again and wonder why you have a bloody nose.
    1
  6. @user-mx9pt4dr7y What are you doing? Crying because he is defending himself? You are a Socialist born and bred. Enjoy the soup lines if you vote for Harris. Just look at their history and stop being so naive.
    1
  7.  @Tomorrowwilldo  You should be embarrassed. He goes by the name "JACK SMITH", not Mark. Which is also not his real name.* "This legal analysis really had me laughing. So far off what reality is. How did Mark Smith get a law degree? If that even is his real name. Sorry FOX, but spewing nonsense only makes you look like you have no clue how law works. Embarrassing."
    1
  8. Directly out of the DOJ Rule Book, and is pasted here so you won't have to look it up. 9-85.500 Actions that May Have an Impact on an Election Federal prosecutors and agents may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party. Such a purpose is inconsistent with the Department’s mission and with the Principles of Federal Prosecution. See § 9-27.260. Any action likely to raise an issue or the perception of an issue under this provision requires consultation with the Public Integrity Section, and such action shall not be taken if the Public Integrity Section advises that further consultation is required with the Deputy Attorney General or Attorney General. [added August 2022]
    1
  9.  @frogslat4579  Those who are blind will not see. Read the braille on the wall and come out of your closet. The braille directions give you the solution to ignorance. Try following them and let your fingers do the walking.
    1
  10. If you weren't such a tool for the Democrat party, we wouldn't have to read your comment either.
    1
  11.  @pamela2790  Says a Sheep who bleats.
    1
  12.  @pamela2790  Your facts are lies fed to you by the MSM who is being paid to LIE to you and convince the weak to give up.
    1
  13.  @rodgerwright5331  Where did you get that number from, the Democrats? BS is what your number is.
    1
  14. Where do you come up with your comments? Who said he can't debate? Do you think this repeat is going to stop anything? Whoever gave you a thumbs-up is not any smarter than you are. This is simply interference and to influence weak minds. Congratulations on being deceived.
    1
  15.  @christaylor7672  Are you also sick of Biden's crimes? No, maybe it was Harris for the past 3 years taking bribes? You are a Dyed-In-The_Wool Sheep.
    1
  16.  @PF1970  But you support a Presidential Candidate being installed right under your nose without a single vote? How stupid are Democrats that can't see that?
    1
  17.  @kevinskinner4986  You don't know what God supports or doesn't, stop pretending that you do.
    1