Comments by "Quintessenz" (@the-quintessenz) on "Why Ukraine joining NATO would crush Russian power" video.

  1. Why is there no debate on changing the geostrategic logic of the region? If the problem is flat land, then a trench at the border aloing with piling up the soil behind it should do the trick. I imagine a 200m deep and 2km wide trench used as channel would stop most aggressive military moves and make defending easer, especially if you pile up the soil frm the trench on both sides to 200m high hills (perhaps with bunkers inside). If you assume costs of 10 million USD per kilometer, a canal from the Black Sea to the Baltic Sea would cost 15 trillion USD. That's a lot, but it would be good for at least 100 years and the construction would benefit both sides. You could also use it for commercial purposes and it wouldn't go out of date like normal military equipment.
    1