Comments by "Keep It Real" (@KeepItReal33) on "White House handpicks media outlets to attend gaggle" video.

  1. The WH is perfectly within it's right to allow or disallow any reporter or group of reporters they wish.
    104
  2. Christopher O'Neil Actually it's the left and liberals who act like Nazis and are against free speech. This was just the WH showing some members of the media that they do not have to put up with disruptive reporters and they should behave as they have with other administrations. The WH doesn't mind answering tough questions,but when the reporter tries to shout their questions and drowned out others, it's just immature and shouldn't be tolerated.
    11
  3. tacomahnster , I thought it was a good decision. It puts the media on notice that the WH doesn't have to put up with abuse from the media. Some of these reporters think they have the "right" to be rude, disrespectful and disruptive and they are sadly mistaken.
    11
  4. CosmicRuna , Obviously you haven't even been watching CNN. Look how liberals and Democrats talk and act. You ARE right that the weak minded are being manipulated, but those people aren't President Trump supporters.
    9
  5. Brian , If ANY (including Fox News) had reporters that were behaving badly, absolutely I would be ok with something of this nature.
    9
  6. The reporters that were not included today, will be allowed to attend the next press conference.This was just a wake up call, letting reporters know that they do NOT have a "right" to be invited. It IS a privilege.
    7
  7. cezar maatubang , The WH doesn't have a problem with tough questions.Have you actually watch how some of these reporters behave? They are disruptive,disrespectful and act like children.I have never,in my life seen reporters act like this in WH press briefings. It's disgraceful!
    5
  8. Able Dog , I couldn't agree with you more. Well said.
    5
  9. cezar maatubang , Again, the WH doesn't mind tough questions, only disruptive behavior. Some of the reporters that were not invited act like children. They will be back at the next press briefing. Hopefully they will behave better or risk being replaced.
    4
  10. Toro Baile, Well, I guess it's all in how you look at it. The media has been openly biased against him LONG before he started speaking up about them... so I would say it's the media (not all of them) who are causing chaos. 1 network in particular has made it their mission in life, to create chaos for his administration.
    4
  11. Toro Baile , He didn't ban the media. Push your agenda in your own country.
    3
  12. Mike will, The President is an American citizen and has rights under the 1st amendment to speak his mind about anything he chooses. It's NOT illegal. As far as the WH not inviting certain reporters to a briefing, there is no law requiring them to even have briefings. So, you are wrong in that count as well.
    3
  13. Toro Baile, President Trump wasn't at the briefing. Lol Let me go through your triggered rant, please forgive me if I miss something. There is STILL, to this day questions about Obama's origin of birth. Obama and Killary... I mean Hillary did, in a sense, create ISIS, but that aside, we know 100% Obama funded them with money and weapons. President Trump did NOT say "terrorists attacks in Sweden"., CNN misunderstood his statement and ran with it. Then they were embarrassed that they ran the story without fact checking and blamed President Trump for THEIR misunderstanding. Anything else?
    3
  14. Marc Arredondo, Wrong. There is no law or article that states the WH is obligated to even do press conferences , much less who they invite to those press conferences. So, it IS a privilege to be invited, not a right.
    3
  15. Rata 4 U, No proof of any Russian connection. No suppression of the media is happening (suppression is the only thing the Constitution protects) and stating an opinion about a courts ruling (especially the 9th circuit court who has had 80% of it's rulings overturned) has not only been done before, but was perfectly justified in the ruling on the travel moratorium. Anything else?
    2
  16. bobothecreepyclown, Wrong. Conservatives take the Constitution as it is written. Liberals /Democrats idea of the first amendment is "I get to say what I want and if you try to say what you want I will shout over you, become violent and assult you or riot and destroy someone elses property. AND they don't belive ANYONE has the right to own a gun.
    2
  17. on2a, The reason Fox News joined the protest is because when Obama did the same thing to Fox, they filed a complaint and some of the other news agencies joined them. Fox is only trying to be fair and help those who helped them. I don't have a problem with that. As to your other statement: What I find to be dangerous is this belief that the media can say and do anything they want, even when what they say is proven to be 100% false. Also, this belief that the media should never be questioned or doubted by ANYONE is also dangerous!
    2
  18. Toro Baile, None of my statements are assumptions. Go back and read my statement to you earlier. There is not 1 ounce of proof that President Trump or any of his campaign has/had ties with Russia. It's pure propaganda by MSM. The FBI already investigated. so you are 100% wrong on that one. CNN jumped the gun 9n the Sweden story and got embarrassed. Plain and simple. They even went on and on for days lying, on air, saying that President Trump stated there was a terrorist attack in Sweden. That IS a fact. As far as President Trump apology to Obama, I never saw it. Please provide a video or link, to a reputable news source. Video wouod be much better, since everyone has a problem with MSM, these days.
    2
  19. bobothecreepyclown, 1st, criminals/terrorists don't follow laws, much less gun laws, so go cry about that in your safe room. You just don't seem to be able to understand what is being said. Let me try to explain it another way. If I throw a party and don't invite a few people that have misbehaved at my previous parties , I'm not guilty of anything. Those people don't have the "right" to be at my party. Now, lets phrase this in big people talk. There is NO law stating that the WH has to hold press briefings. Ther is NO law stating who "must" be invited. There are MANY legitimate news agencies that are not allowed at the WH briefings. Do you understand that ? No one told CNN that they can't report anything they want. They were even provided a copy of the transcript. CNN is just butthurt that they got rightly excluded form the party. Period. For you and others to try and turn that into a Constitutional issue, shows the extent that the MSM has brainwashed you!
    2
  20. Rata 4 U, Read my statement to "bobothecreepyclown" for the media issue. Flynn did Nothing wrong by speaking with Russia. It IS job related. the FBI has listened to ever work of the recorded conversation and stated that there is Nothing illegal in the conversation. Flynn was fired for misleading the Vice-President. It really is that simple. Trying to make it a huge Russian thing is simply ridiculous.
    2
  21. Rata 4 U, You are 100% wrong. He had already been selected. He was doing his job.
    2
  22. Rata 4 U, Again, you are just spewing accusations with no proof.
    2
  23. Rata 4 U, LMFAO. You are delusional! President Trump (yes, he IS your President, also) never admitted any such thing. Now you have proven yourself to be a flat out lier. Go troll somewhere else.
    2
  24. Marc Arredondo, The WH invited reporters, just not the ones you wanted, apparently. LMAO. Suck it up, Snowflake
    2
  25. Christopher O'Neil, It's not the Right who stages riots to keep people from speaking. Your "critical thinking" is flawed and cannot out weigh logic. As long as speech does not insite violence, it is protected under the United States Constitution. Just because you don't like what is being said, whether you find it to be hateful or not, means nothing and is NOT a justification to try and stop that speech.
    1
  26. Mike will, What has President Trump done that you "think" is against the Constitution or Supreme Court?
    1
  27. Rata 4 U, No proof of any Russian connection. No suppression of the media is happening (suppression is the only thing the Constitution protects) and stating an opinion about a courts ruling (especially the 9th circuit court who has had 80% of it's rulings overturned) has not only been done before, but was perfectly justified in the ruling on the travel moratorium. Anything else?
    1