Comments by "Keep It Real" (@KeepItReal33) on "WH eyes security clearances of former top Obama officials" video.

  1. Anyone who isn’t actively working for the Government, should NOT have access to classified information. That should be a no brainer!
    22
  2. C B , As soon as President Trump leaves office, I wish. Again.... let me reintegrate.... ANYONE who is not actively working for the Government, should NOT have access to classified information. I can’t make it anymore clear than that....
    2
  3. John Hillman , You’re the fool, if you think it’s needed.
    1
  4. C B , But IF you are agreeing with me that, “Anyone that is NOT working for our Government, should NOT have access to classified information!”, then bravo. You are making progress.... you now only need to do some research to correct your false assumptions that you know who does and doesn’t work for our Government....😳
    1
  5. C B , She is an employee. That’s a fact. Look it up. However, even IF she was only an “advisor”, she would by definition, be working for our Government.
    1
  6. Zorro theHumble , What have I said here, that you can dispute?
    1
  7. Zorro theHumble , I do, but I’m saying it’s unnecessary and the reasons given are rarely used. “IF” someone is serving as an “advisor” to the government, then they need to be officially named as such to maintain transparency in our government. Otherwise, they don’t need access to classified information.
    1
  8. Zorro theHumble , It was a “long standing practice” for the CIA to assassinate foreign leaders, but we changed that “long standing practice” because it was wrong and immoral. So, just because something is a “long standing practice”, doesn’t mean it should continue.
    1