Comments by "Vinland" (@VINLAND_777) on "“Ukraine Fires 40 Rockets At Donetsk” l “Putin Will Have Another Go At Kyiv” l Russia Shells Kherson" video.

@kiambojyms2196 e west agreed to follow the Minsk agreement? What are you talking about? 1. 1945 Moscow signed the UN charter which includes not to attack any sovereign country. 2. 1994 Moscow (Sergey Lavrov) signed the Budapest memorandum not to attack Ukraine or question it‘s territorial integrity. If Russia would not have violated all of the above Minsk 1 and 2 (which where in fact cease fire deals) would not have been needed. According to ALL investigating parties, the Minsk 1 & 2 deals where broken by Russia and possibly also Ukraine. These are the historical facts everybody can read online from trustworthy sources.
22
@UC17M6aQh2upmXmtM3k4ns0A 1. Gorbatchev himself said, that this was no talking point during these negotiations. Google his interviews. 2. Do you really think, that such an important „deal“ would not have been brought onto paper and signed by the leading NATO countries and Russia? Really? Furthermore, check where the closest Nuclear warheads to any Russian borders are and then how many Russian ones are all alomg Europes borders as well as within Europe itself on annexed territory called Kaliningrad. BTW. Germany had to pay a lot of money to the Kremlin to get their territory back and again to rebuild this part of Germany.
14
@Agressor-ft3eb I‘m neither American nor living in a NATO country, so where‘s your point? How many times has China violated international law would be my question to you in return to make as much sense as your question did. I am capable to discuss a topic at hand without looking for excuses somewhere in time and space to support my view. By the way: Where have you been when the US violated any international law? Did you as well raise your voice on the streets and collect signatures to send a letter lf protest to your government? Well, I did and as you can see, I also do it when Russia violates it. But it seems you only condemn others crimes while supporting Russias, correct?
3
@ЕленаБем-ц1й Yes, i know what you are saying — no paper which official Russia signed is worth a thing. Ask yourself, if anyone in the near future will make any agreements with Russia then? Yes I know, you think Russia needs no one and it does not matter if anyone in Europe or America does business with Russia. But I have to tell you, your patriotism and pride will not help you and the generations of Russians to come. Good luck
3
@richardduplessis1090 1. Sanctions are still a better way trying to stop Russia from invading it‘s neighbors than using the same agression in return. 2. Sanctions mean only, „I no longer sell you my goods and no longer buy your goods“ - completely leggit. 3. If you really think Europe will suffer more from Russias agressions than Russia itself will, then you might want to educate yourself a bit on economics. Wait for it! I might be in a luxurious position in Switzerland and call myself lucky to bee born here. So far we have like 3%-5% inflation and no power or goods shortages. Also no rise in unemployment. What you forgett is, that in the long term we will need even more employes in Europe as we bring a lot of manufacturing back locally and have to invent new solutions for energy demands. So, i‘d say malicious joy is not really helping you to solve the issues in Russia itself.
1
@topviewstudios You are wrong here. Ukraine held a referendum (yes, a official one) about Ukraines independence and over 90% of all Ukrainians voted with „YES“. Just because some seperatists and Russian propaganda tried to influence people in the east, does not mean the outcome of the voting should no longer be respected. Let‘s ask the Chechens, Georgians, (part of) Mongols and people in Kamtchatka if they want to be independend and tell Moscow then that these parts now no longer are Russian. I am sure Putin and the Kremlin would just agree on that, right? I am really having a hard time following some Russian logic when it comes to such topics.
1
@cerebelul Well, you can assume whatever you like, but in fact i read them multiple times. But instead of making assumptions about what i read and not, you‘d better refute any of my points if you can?
1
@topviewstudios ou sure have evidence for that claim‘s right? But you are correct on one point - The west is allways a step ahead when it comes to technology and inventions and others just copy 20-30 year old technology. And no, not only in the military department.
1