Comments by "David H" (@DavidHalko) on "Почему Америка не может ИСПОЛЬЗОВАТЬ нефть, которую она производит" video.

  1. I don’t know how you could be right in so many points but wrong on some key points. The Trump Administration sees increased US & Saudi Arabian production to be the key to bringing down energy prices, not solely “drill drill drill” (which is half the puzzle.) Furthermore, this will also bring pressure to ending the war in Ukraine, as it will drain the remaining reserves of the Russian government. This will reduce inflation, as well as a strong border policy, which will end more people living in the US than what the US permits for housing… these two things will end inflation and bring a temporary quantity of deflation as markets are “right sized”. The building of pipelines, which is also strategic, will also bring better energy independence, which is in this president’s agenda. I wish someone would build a pipeline from Texas to California — we need to end oil shipments via port. Those ports in California are a problem. Also, a pipeline from Alaska via Canada, possibly to connect to Keystone, would be fabulous! Offshore oil accidents are a nightmare. Let’s hope for the sake of North America that a lot can get done in 4 years.
    2
  2. 13:00 - “[oil] shipped to us by boat” Shipping oil is more environmentally risky than piping it. Oil spills on surface is easier to clean than oil spills in water ways.
    1
  3. - “how can you ask…” People sometimes do something because the short term effects are painful (like getting rabies shots after being bitten) to avoid long term discomfort (dying from rabies.) - “you can’t have both” This is how the USSR effectively ended their Afghanistan occupation & eventually ended. - “Canada… pipelines to coastal waters” Thus Trump’s suggestion for 2x Canadian 🇨🇦 states & Greenland. 🇬🇱 Pipeline to Europe.
    1