Youtube comments of DK1 (@Progamble).

  1. 78
  2. 75
  3. 39
  4. 34
  5. 30
  6. 26
  7. 23
  8. 23
  9. 23
  10. 22
  11. 20
  12. 18
  13. 17
  14. 14
  15. 13
  16. 13
  17. 12
  18. 10
  19. 10
  20. 10
  21. 10
  22. 10
  23. 7
  24. 7
  25. 7
  26. 7
  27. 7
  28. 6
  29. 6
  30. 6
  31. 6
  32. 6
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 5
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4
  51. 4
  52. 4
  53. 4
  54. 3
  55. 3
  56. 3
  57. 3
  58. 3
  59. 3
  60. 3
  61. 3
  62. 3
  63. 3
  64. aly, Romans 7:2-3 says :"Now, dear brothers and sisters—you who are familiar with the law—don’t you know that the law applies only while a person is living? For example, when a woman marries, the law binds her to her husband as long as he is alive. But if he dies, the laws of marriage no longer apply to her. So while her husband is alive, she would be committing adultery if she married another man. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law and does not commit adultery when she remarries." According to these verses when is a married woman free from the covenant of marriage?????? Clearly it is when her husband dies. So if she was to remarry whilst he is alive she would be committing adultery. The Scripture is plain and clear. Now, the whole context of my comments in relation to this Royal Wedding was not about whether they are living in perpetual adultery, Instead the context was about GOD BLESSING this marriage. God cannot impart his COMPLETE BLESSING to this marriage because Megan Markle is still bound by God's Law to her first husband. For example, when King David murdered Bathsheba's husband and took her to be his wife did God FULLY BLESS DAVID????????? No! There were consequences for his murder and adultery. What were the consequences? His child became ill and died, God allowed for disunity to plague David's family. There are also consequences for couples remarrying and committing adultery. God is holy, just and righteous, He will not simply look past sin. The truth is that God cannot bestow HIS COMPLETE BLESSING on a marriage that begins with adultery.
    3
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 2
  70. 2
  71. 2
  72. 2
  73. 2
  74. 2
  75. 2
  76. 2
  77. 2
  78. 2
  79. 2
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. 2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163.  @dennismenace4188  There u go again! You use the word "rational" in relation to beliefs, yet u cannot explain to me why we have laws of logic, if the universe came about through a chance explosion billions of years ago? I don't think I am asking u a complicated question, and I am not trying to play on words or trick u. I just want a simple explanation, according to your worldview, as to why we all agree that, for example, 1+1 = 2 and not 3! Why are there universal truths that we all agree upon if all that we are is star dust and our thoughts are just chemical reactions in our brain? The truth is that most atheists haven't really thought through there worldview. If your honest with yourself, you would have to admit that atheism cannot account for the existence of logic. If u were true to yourself and did not suppress the truth, u would have to agree that logic comes from a rationale mind, yet the universe, came into existence, that is according to your worldview, without a rationale mind. Can u see the absurdity????? Yet atheist's claim that anyone who believes in intelligent design is irrational and emotional. But the truth is that atheist's use the cover of "science" and "rationale" to hide their blatant hatred of the Creator. The truth is, they know He exists, but they appeal to a lack of evidence in order to deny creation and suppress the truth. The heart of the matter is this: YOU WANT TO LIVE LIFE YOUR WAY AND NOT HAVE TO SUBMIT TO ANYONE OR ANYTHING and u will use whatever argument u can, regardless of how irrational it is, in order to keep living in rebellion.
    1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196.  @greebo7857  1. um i think you have forgotten something, that is...why did the opposition block supply in 1975? It was bcoz the Whitlam government was filled with scandals and it sought to introduce radical social programmes which cost an arm and a leg! So what is more scandalous and damaging to Victoria, Whitlam's policies or Andrew's mishandling of the Coronavirus???? 2. The Governor of Victoria is supposed to be impartial, and he or she has the power to dismiss ministers and even the Premier, so you are wrong when u say that "there is nothing in Vic's constitution that would allow her to act." Please refer to the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_of_Victoria  Also, what if the Victorian Governor fails in his or her duty? What if they are not impartial? Who is the next line of authority? Is it not the Governor General at the federal level? Do you think the Victorian Governor should have intervened in this Pandemic and held the Andrew's government accountable? Doesn't the mishandling of the Coronavirus by the Andrews government which cost hundreds of lives, billions of dollars, mass unemployment, warrant the Victorian Governor taking action? If not then what crises situation does warrant intervention by the Victorian Governor???? 3. As for the Governor General not having any authority over Victoria, u are partly correct in that the Governor General's main duties center around Federal issues. However, what if a State issue has the potential of affecting the entire nation? What if due to the incompetence or corruption of a State government, the entire nation is damaged? Does the Governor general then have the power to intervene at a state level? Do you think the handling of the Coronavirus by the Andrew's government has the potential to affect the entire nation???? Not so stupid?
    1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272.  @最好的设备挨最毒的打  You know why we go slow? Because we have strict laws that we must follow. These laws protect us and others from disaster! We don't let builders build on bad ground. We don't let builders build with weak materials. Everything must be done following laws so that the building is excellent quality. But in China u build very, very quick, but poor quality. Look at how many buildings collapse in China???? But we build very, very slowly but the structure is strong and lasts many, many years. Because Chinese people follow few laws, you now have S.A.R.S virus in 2003 and now CORONA VIRUS IN 2020. But in my country no such viruses. Why???? Because in my country u cannot buy, for example, snakes at the market. It is impossible! Why? Because we have strict laws. But in China people don't follow laws properly, that is why exotic diseased animals can be sold at the market illegally. Chinese people think they are smart because they do everything very, very quick and we Western people very, very dumb because we do things slowly. But look at the results. In Beijing u cannot breathe the air because of pollution. Now u have viruses. Why? Because u do everything quickly without thinking about long term consequences. For China speed is everything, planning and following the law is too slow. But in my country we plan and think about long term consequences and build slowly but properly. Then latter we have no problems. Buildings are not falling down and we have no viruses and the air in our cities are clean. So who is more smarter, the Chinese who are fast, or the slow Westerners????? Have a think about what I said, because SPEED KILLS.
    1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1