Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Ukraine Secures VITAL Supply Road Going Into BAKHMUT" video.

@chinonsojohnjude4175 The fall of Bakhmut is just a side effect anway. Even with the disgusting waste of human lives by keep on pumping cannonfodder into this obvious cauldron, they aren't able to hold it anymore against some mercenaries. Russia's army isn't even going in there, why should they?
4
@31mAyMgaYanga Because it's not special year to have a super big parade. Parades are smaller and bigger all the time. This year was 78. Not 75, not 80, no reason to make it big. But sure, it's not unlikely that the random terror attacks of the Nazis played an additional role to scale it down to make counter terrorism easier.
3
Don't get how people think that there are lines there. The front lines of Russia are fare behind these lines on the map. What you got there is at best some light scout units, which "don't break", but simply aren't as insane a the Ukrup Nazis, to fight over that position. They fall back and let the other lines do their work. This isn't a fight with swords, spears and bows. The main offensive weapons is artillerys and you keep artillery many km away from that line on the map for obvious reasons. Russia got no reason to hold that hill. They don't even got a reason to hold Bakhmut which is a ruin at this point. When the Nazis go in again, wonderful. Much better they get into these ruins which are destroyed anyway, then falling back into another, not yet ruined city and abuse this as cover.
1
Both territories are pointless. Bakhmut is in ruins, thanks to the Nazis using it as cover. Overall it's nice for Russia when the Nazis attack and go in there. No reason to hold back. The city is destroyed anyway. Let them come and "recapture" it. Nothing more stupid than that.
1
@31mAyMgaYanga War is about destroying the enemy's army. Territory doesn't matter at all if not linked to some other things like controlling specific resources or alike.
1