Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Ukraine's BRILLIANT Plan to Win the War, but..." video.

  1. I really would like to know, what they tell these guys or do to them, that they don't just surrender. This is not like SU vs Nazi army, where it was clear, that the Nazis were there to commit a complete genocide. This whole war is mainly about NATO interests for Russian (and Ukrainian) resources and you could maybe argue, that the soldiers could think about keeping Ukraine as it was. But how stupid is that idea? They do not just fight the Russian army. Those eight years they fought all those Ukrainians and that's still the case. Russia is the big brother who came to help and is life saving important of course, but overall it should still be clear, that a big majority of the people in East Ukraina DON'T WANT TO be part of Ukraine anymore, which had tried to murder or deport them for the last eight years. What exactly are these people dying for?
    72
  2.  @QualityPen  They got all the time of the world, why should the hurry?
    34
  3. NATO must win before winter, what of course does not work. Else you got a massive economical crisis.
    7
  4.  @bloodsord9  Well, you can call those soldierw with some days or weeks training indeed just civilians. Still: when you pick up a weapon and alike, you are no civlian anymore. And civilians die mainly by Ukrainian artillery (since years btw), because they blindly fire at villages and cities without care.
    7
  5.  @emrysgeibhendach7572  Ukraines losses are much, much, much, much higher and Russia's losses not even close to those 38k. Hell, peopel these days really don't use their brain for a second...
    4
  6. S-400 is not really made for shooting down those MLRS missiles, there are more fitting systems for that.
    4
  7. Destroying bridges with firecrackers liek HIMARS is close to impossible. Bridges are heavy structurs, build to withstand enormous forces. You need a lot of TNT and place it at the right poinst to bring them down. To just shoot a missile at it will not do much, especially not something like those HIMARS rockets, which are not made for destroying such objects.
    3
  8. Ukraine got such plans since eight years. Their problem is: a) After the coup a good third of the people did not really like that coup at all - this includes the people who had chosen to be soldier. b) When the coup regime ordered the military to just stomp out any resistence by force, even more soldiers were against it, regime change was one thing but military violence against those who thought otherwise? A no go. This not only lead to massive loses in the Ukrainian army (including officers) by desertion, many of those started to FIGHT for the people they were ordered to get rid off. Even those who did not switch were not really in high moral and overall the image of the Ukrainian army suffered so much, that many young peopel who should join the army simply did not show up. Their replacement? Extremists. Peopel who were so brutally nationalist, racist and even fascistic, that they had no problem with following orders for murder. Problem (beside the obvious): those people were not really the best soldiers. That's why the coup regime Ukraine was not able to conquer the Donbass in all these years beside a big equipment advantage. They ran so often into cauldron traps (an as stupid as pretty much worst mistake you can make, there is near to no situation that is worse than getting trapped into a cauldron) since 2014 - and they never learned anything from it. Pretty much only reason for this can be: they got a terrible and likely often switching leadership. Meanwhile it seems that Ukrainian army mainly get political orders and have to follow thos, no matter how stupid and suicidal. An offense alone got not worth if you are unable tho hold what you conquer. It's one of the reason why Russia is taking their time. They go no prob with the suicidal 'counter offensives' of Ukraine, in contrary.
    2
  9. Don't think that Ukraine really destroyed some big ammuntion depot. 1) This explosion does not look like one. Yes, it's big, but if you look at known explosions of ammuntion depots, you got a lot of secondary explosions there and there is many other stuff that can cause massive explosions, for example fertilizer (the massive detonation in Beirut was fueled by fertilizer, just for people to know, how brutal that can be). 2) The idea, that Russia would have such big ammuntion depots right at the front line is pretty absurd. Ukraine got for example Tochka-U, I don't know which version and by that range they got, but even the one with the smallest range is on par with the HIMARS MLRS missiles and that story about destroyed ammuntion depot was at a time before those 300km HIMARS rockets (which by the way are likely easier to intercept than the small ones - and the whole GPS story is a problem anyway).
    2
  10.  @karelianwarrior8966  The small ones? Of course, they are pretty much the same. The big 300km one is very different.
    2
  11.  @BeerHombre  Well, a HIMARS without the R is pretty much just a super expensive and really shitty truck.
    1
  12.  @markusdee6136  Of course those tubes are not the expensive part.
    1
  13. @Swarmpope You do get that this is a very dumb lie only stupid people would believe. Think about it a second: who would have massive ammuntion depots right at the front line in artillery range, hm?
    1
  14. The numbers from Ukraine about Russian losses are absurd. Someone should tell their PR advisers to cut that by 90% and it would be a bit more believeable. And Ukraine is still 'standing' because NATO fascism and its puppets in the Ukraine just burn it down. They don't stand, they just horribly die for nothing.
    1
  15.  @alvaro701  You mean those NATO camps at the western border of Ukraine just blew up themselves? Intersting theory.
    1
  16.  @iplaygames8090  Well, they constantly get new stuff from NATO fascist, but this is also no endless source.
    1
  17. It's nice if the enemy comes to you, that's why. NATO is just ruining itself with that dumpster fire Ukraine it created.
    1
  18. Modern war is just hell for human beings (and war had always been terrible) and it just got worse the last decades. Even close range compat with rifles you almost see nothing and more blindly shoot in a direction. And that's rifles. Now take missiles and alike which fire from behind the horizon and you just die. To just train pretty much civilians for some weeks and send them in there is pretty much planed murder of them.
    1
  19. Why should Russia have a problem with NATO depleting their ammuntion resources in such a way? What is thrown into the dumpster fire in Ukraine can't be use elsewhere. Let it come, used by people who got close to no clue and shit surveillance. Sure, it would be better if the whole shit show stopped, but what's better: NATO weapons being destroyed in Ukraine or those NATO weapons for example being delivered to Finnland? Money? Money is worthless and Russia just makes endless of it. Also: the price of those missiles is the seeling price. To produce them is likely much cheaper.
    1
  20.  @vaultdweller966  Obviously a PR bot - or stupid, who knows.
    1
  21. No one, it's a Nazi greeting. It's like yelling "Heil dem Deutschen Vaterland" oder dergleichen.
    1
  22. East Ukrainians fight for that against the Nazi Ukrainians NATO arms.
    1
  23. Just because Ukraine and NATO are run by Nazis doesn't mean that Russia will do the same.
    1
  24. You think the one who sold it stayed in Ukraine? These guys ran off with the money. Much smarter than just dying with that thing.
    1
  25.  @thehawk8486  You mean US claim via abusing UN for it. UN told Ukraine he shall follow Minsk 2 and stop the mass murdering war SINCE YEARS. Never did, nothing happened, instead NATO fascism trained and armed these Nazis further, is paying them now and sending even more weapons, while shitting all over media and sociel media their absurd war propaganda withotu care how stupid it is - but enough stupid people will still believe it. UN is worthless - always has been. As long as NATO exists and just rapes everything it could stand for, it's worthless.
    1
  26.  @SPEARHEADGLOBAL  60 missiles would be pretty much nothing, though.
    1
  27. Because it's absolut stupid and at best a desperate try to trick someone. Problem is: Russia got complete dominant surveillance. You can hide some single units here and there (and even there you need luck and this will run out sooner or later), because Ukraine is pretty big, but you can't hide whole armies and all the logistic it needs.
    1
  28. The plan is simple: NATO wants to burn down Ukraine in the try to push Russia into chaos so it can rob both. Doesn't work at all, but, well, Ukraine still burns for it, thanks to NATO.
    1
  29.  @vaultdweller966  True, that's what caused the Nazis for example (and does again right now). Just belive the lie and stay the good guy, even if you commit mass murder. Watch Milgram. Majority of people would torture someone to death if they were ordered to and told that it's the right thing. One of the biggest reason for this: when they get, that what they do might not be right, this majority just keeps lying to themselves to deny their crime. If they deny the reality, they can stay the good little helper who just followed orders.
    1
  30.  @fraulens  If the carrying struture is not damage, those holes make no difference for a tank and would be a bigger problem for a car.
    1
  31. HIMARS missiles aren't really that strong, actually.
    1