Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Could the 2000 Mules Footage Be Wrong? (Pt. 2) | Dinesh D’Souza | POLITICS | Rubin Report" video.

@andrerodriguez7603 The story does seem to have a lot of holes in it. However, it does bring up one question. Is this possible? Could a person go to a nursing home and coerce the extreme elderly to vote for the party of that person's choice? If it is possible, why wouldn't the governing body put into place policies that would prevent it from happening? If this is done, then no one could claim voting fraud, at least using this method. It would be in the best interest of everyone to ensure that elections are fair and that as many opportunities for fraud are diminished. Why would anyone object to that? It seems that nearly every election, there's accusations of voter fraud and the newly elected president is a fake president. Biden, Trump and the Bush administrations have all been accused of election fraud. Why not put an end to it or at least try to mitigate the opportunities as much as possible? I don't get it and I really don't get why the Democrats are so against it.
1
@Neptunus9 I tend to agree. However, my agreement with you doesn't make it false. Truth can be uncovered when rumours reveal something that's something is wrong. What's bad about this is that it shows that the elections are NOT secure. As long as the possibility is there that it is true, people will question the integrity of the elections. Witness how the 2000 election was questioned. Then, the 2016 election was questioned and Hillary still claims that she was cheated. Then the 2020 elections. That's where the term "election denier" was coined. That's 3 elections, out of 5, where "election denying" existed and it escalated every time. Unless the 2024 election is a landslide, one way or another, it'll be contested as well. They have to tighten the election process or this nonsense will never stop. It could even end in a major conflict. That's not BS.
1