Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "The Most Controversial Opinions a Black Man Can Have (Pt. 1) | Glenn Loury | POLITICS | Rubin Report" video.

  1.  @sthubbins4038  Almost no conservatives supported what happened on Jan. 6th...and it wasn't an insurrection. It was a group of protesters who got carried away. It's a poor insurrection that has NO guns, NO command structure and no short term, let alone long term, goals. The term is "insurrection" is being used for political gain. It wasn't NEARLY as dangerous or destructive as last year's BLM riots or the actions of Antifa around the country.
    13
  2.  @sthubbins4038  Why are YOU ignoring all the accusations of election fraud in 2005 and, especially in 2016? They actually spent 35 million bucks for a commission to look into it. That's not insane. Yet, there was NOTHING. Spending all that money and saying "Not my president" is rational but, with some of the irregularities exposed by Project Veritas in Minneapolis, and the arrest of Rachel Rodriguez, in Texas, show that there were problems. Both cases showed huge problems with a blanket mail system....yet NO ONE is allowed to say nothing because that's insane. You absolutely REFUSE to discuss those things. Saying that he wanted to find the votes to win isn't illegal. It's wishful thinking at best and rather foolish at worst...but so what? I'll bet Hillary wished she could have found the evidence for collusion. Isn't that insane. By your standards....yes, but I have a feeling insanity lies only with your political views. You can't even see the hypocrisy in your logic.
    4
  3.  @sthubbins4038  Of course he wanted to "find" those votes. If they existed, he wanted to find them. Who wouldn't? Even you'd want to find them....if you thought that they existed, especially if those votes would help your cause. Isn't it strange that when Trump questions the irregularities of the election, it shakes the entire foundation of the Republic. Yet, when Obama did it in 2005 and Hillary did it in 2016.....that's legit and no problem. Especially when there was absolutely NO proof of collusion, yet Hillary STILL carries on about it and Adam Schiff, even though he claimed that he has irrefutable proof, never presented the proof and STILL claims that there was Russian collusion. The riots in 2016, against Trump, was no big deal and only righteous but the riots on Jan 6th.....horrific. The inconsistency is remarkable. And before you tell me that I'm being a hypocrite, I think that the rioters were wrong in BOTH cases and should be prosecuted. Rioting is WRONG and I don't care who does it. We live in a land that is supposed to live by the rule of law. Everyone should honour that, at all times, not only when it suits their own agenda.
    3
  4.  @sthubbins4038  NO ONE invalidated this election. He was just as sure that there was fraud as Hillary was and he told that crowd to march "peacefully and patriotically", HIS words, to let the members of Congress know how he felt. He then told the audience to GO HOME and "primary" those Republicans that didn't question the integrity of the election. "Primary them"...that means for them to get ready for the NEXT election. It means to get Republican candidates that will support the president, no matter who it is. Does that REALLY sound like "storm the Capital Building" to you? Also, Trump was over a mile away, when he gave that speech. It was impossible for him to "watch" them storm the building. That's pure hyperbole on your part. I gave TWO examples of VERY questionable events around this election...TWO examples that should have been investigated and ONE WAS and the person was charged. This woman bragged that she had control of over 7 thousand mail in ballots. MAIL IN BALLOTS....the very thing that Trump was worried about all along and this woman was charged for doing it. Hillary had NO evidence....AT ALL. The Mueller report turned up nothing and it cost the American taxpayers MILLIONS to do it. YOUR taxpayer money. Now the Democrats are spending even more. Thousands of troops around the Capital. Barbed wire fencing. Investigating military personnel for questionable tweets and reassigning them. Investigating government offices and purging all Republican supporters by going through their internet accounts. Do you know who else did that? Who did it right after the "Night of the Long Knives"? They have NO right to investigate people that weren't even there or to question the loyalty of military personnel because a few jerks, out of tens of thousands that were in Washington that day, acted foolishly. Security even LET some of them in, if they promised not to damage anything. Then the Democrats had a state funeral for officer Sicknick, claiming he was killed fighting rioters, when he died the following day from a stroke which had nothing to do with the riots. Now they have some of them in solitary confinement, even though it was months ago. Yet, when Antifa barricaded the doors of a Federal Courthouse, in Portland, and tried to burn the place down with people inside it, they just let them go. Over 120 nights in a row of rioting in Portland and they're STILL rioting. They had violent protests AGAIN last night and over 2 dozen gunshots at the one year Memorial for George Floyd at the "autonomous" zone in Minneapolis. In the middle of the day, caught on video. It's all political theatre and it's 2 sets of rules. And to top it all off....I've already said that those who broke in should be arrested and charged. They're a bunch of idiots. The difference is....I want to apply the law equally to rioters. YOU only want to apply it to those you don't like.
    2
  5. He sounds like he's got a head on his shoulders. I was impressed by what I heard.
    1