Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Social Media Purge Backfiring? & the Real History of Fascism | Patrick Byrne | TECH | Rubin Report" video.

@LikeGod_ButBetterLooking So, when Obama and Hillary Clinton claimed that there was election fraud, back in 2005, they were either Nazis or enablers of Nazis? When the Democrats claimed that the Russians and Trump, committed election fraud, they were being Nazis and Nazi enablers? You can't have it both ways. By your logic, Obama is, at best, a Nazi enabler as is Hillary, Adam Schiff, Pelosi and Donald Trump. In fact, the majority of our government are all Nazis. A poorly thought out argument.
11
@LikeGod_ButBetterLooking So, if you think that election fraud could happen, THEN you're a Nazi. LOL. I guess all you have to do is find one discrepancy in circumstances and you're off the hook. A really fined tuned set of rules you have there. Hillary STILL hasn't accepted the results of the election in which she lost. A sign of true Nazi. She was all in on the election fraud claim in 2005, so it seems that she had a justification to claim fraud in place. She certainly knew of the possibility and had stated it. However, there has to be something different in her claims than Trump's claims. Maybe it was the volume or loudness of Trump's claims that make the difference. He certainly is a lot louder than Hillary. Man....are you splitting hairs. I'll bet it's because you're so politically and ideologically obsessed that you can't see or don't want to see, the contradictions in your stance. The truth is, this election fraud claim is nothing new. It's just louder now, but not by much. The Russian collusion, started at the moment the Democrats realised they lost. They had fraud in their heads and then went looking for the evidence to back up their claim and they haven't given it up even though the Mueller report turned up nothing.
11
@LikeGod_ButBetterLooking However, when you own the technology that controls communication and it becomes a monopoly, you have the ability to throttle free speech. It brings with it, the ability to control the political sphere and become the arm of a political faction. This is why monopolies are inherently anti-freedom. They set the rules and those rules will inevitably involve the suppression of basic freedoms. Right now, big tech has chosen a political side and they've gotten in bed with a political faction to the advantage of that faction. They've crossed the line. They've become an arm of those who want power.
10
@MawcDrums Ate their products all the time. I didn't care about the company one way or the other. I did start caring about them when certain people wanted to destroy them for the views of their founding family. I don't want to see anyone destroyed and I cared about that. Before that proposed boycott, I had no reason to "care" about them or be concerned that people would destroy them to satisfy their own political ego. Now I do.
5