Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Tide Turning Against Critical Race Theory? What Obama's Comments Reveal | ROUNDTABLE | Rubin Report" video.

In hindsight, Romney would have been better but only because his voice would have had no effect on the race riots of 2014. Obama stoked the fans of violence by saying nothing against the violence. He could have been a HUGE positive voice against the violence and race based politics but he endorsed it with his silence. We're paying for it now. Romney would have been a zero, another swamp creature. His word would have been ineffectual against the BLM rhetoric. Obama had the opportunity but it appears that he wanted it to happen. That's what makes Obama worse than Romney. Not an endorsement of Romney. It's a criticism of Obama.
2
@TsunTzu I'm just talking about the race issues. Obama had the status to make a big positive difference. Romney didn't have that potential voice to make a difference. I guess I'm talking about a wasted opportunity as far as Obama is concerned although I would imagine that he doesn't see it that way.
1
@linjicakonikon7666 So, if I regret voting for Obama, I'm not thinking for myself? However, if I'm glad that I voted for him, I AM thinking for myself. LOL. Let me know what else I'm supposed to think. Save me the trouble of thinking for myself.
1