Comments by "" (@death_parade) on "How HMS Queen Elizabeth compares to India's newest aircraft carrier" video.

  1. We got a better surface fleet than the Brits at the moment. So yeah, not just comparable, we surpassed them.
    3
  2.  @ashleygoggs5679  What is this nonsense? Just because UK carriers had issues doesn't mean Indian carrier will. Just because the entire UK Navy's surface fleet has no anti-ship missile capability doesn't mean Indian Navy is also like that. In fact, Indian Navy has one of the most formidable anti-ship capabilities in the world due to more than half its ships carrying BrahMos supersonic cruise missile. So yeah, do keep your biases to yourself.
    2
  3.  @ashleygoggs5679  You might want to check dude, your Harpoon is being pulled out of service and its interim replacement stands cancelled. Its sad to watch. I mean I considered Harpoon a lemon, but to lose even that. Ouch. As for a first of class facing issues, minor issues might happen, but major issues usually do not. And in your case a major coupling in the propulsion broke down in the SECOND VESSEL of its class (HMS Prince of Wales). Meanwhile, INS Vikrant has been under trials for over a year an no serious issue developed. The proof is in the pudding. I don't need to look for excuses to answer for this, you do. And therefore you make excuses while your SECOND ship in its class undergoes embarrassing malfunctions.
    2
  4. Seething? Indians? Or Brits! Your entire surface fleet has ZERO anti-ship missile capability. Harpoons of your Destroyers and Frigates all retired without replacement for the decade. And your F-35B can only drop bombs onto ships because they got no anti-ship missiles. Meanwhile half the Indian fleet is bristling with deadly supersonic cruise missiles. Indian destroyers are superior to your Type 45, so no thanks. Come back when your destroyers have a Cooperative Engagement Capability or a 4 panel Gallium Arsenide AESA radar or a Supersonic Cruise Missile like BrahMos or a single-tier Ballistic Missile Defence capability or ability to carry two helicopters. Oh wait, by the time you get those things on your destroyers, we will have our next class of destroyers ready with 120+ VLS, a 6-meter Gallium Nitride AESA radar, a TWO-tier Ballistic Missile Defence Capability and a Hypersonic Cruise Missile. . Now seethe and cope.
    2
  5. True that single engine aircraft on carriers is a problem. Part of the reason Indian Navy decided to pull the plug on the Tejas Naval Fighter program (after it completed landing and take-off demonstrations from the Indian carrier R33) was because it was single engine, even if that engine was a highly reliable American one. About the MiG-29K though, India practically bankrolled the development of the MiG-29K variant when it decided to buy R33 from Russia. But the MiG-29K have their fair share of problems now and so the Navy is considering replacing them in the interim with American SuperHornet and finally with the new Indian Twin-Engine Deck-based Fighter, which basically looks like a stretched Rafale with DSI.
    2
  6.  @thomasward8498  LOL no they aren't. Say hello to reality:- Your entire surface fleet has ZERO anti-ship missile capability. Harpoons of your Destroyers and Frigates all retired without replacement for the decade. And your F-35B can only drop bombs onto ships because they got no anti-ship missiles. Meanwhile half the Indian fleet is bristling with deadly supersonic cruise missiles. Indian destroyers are superior to your Type 45, so no thanks. Come back when your destroyers have a Cooperative Engagement Capability or a 4 panel Gallium Arsenide AESA radar or a Supersonic Cruise Missile like BrahMos or a single-tier Ballistic Missile Defence capability or ability to carry two helicopters. Oh wait, by the time you get those things on your destroyers, we will have our next class of destroyers ready with 120+ VLS, a 6-meter Gallium Nitride AESA radar, a TWO-tier Ballistic Missile Defence Capability and a Hypersonic Cruise Missile.
    1
  7. Want me to intellectually violate you, punk? The entire UK Navy surface fleet has ZERO anti-ship missile capability. Your harpoons for your destroyers and frigates have just retired without replacement and your F-35B can't fire anything other than bombs at ships (WW2 style). So yeah. Meanwhile, half the Indian Navy carries BrahMos supersonic Anti-Ship missile and the MiG-29K carry Switchblades. And this was just the anti-ship capability. If I get into Combat Management Systems, Radar, Ballistic Missile Defence capability, etc, Indian Destroyers and even the new frigates will come out looking ahead of the current UK T45 destroyers, let alone your frigates. . I could go on and on you know? I could extend this stuff onto land where the disparity is much greater.
    1
  8.  @paulm6742  Indian Government spends $250 Billion annually on supporting its poor. And spends $72 Billion on its military because we got ACTUAL threats knocking on our doors. And spends $1.5 Billion on the Space Program. But you spend less than 0.01% of a squirrel's brain while commenting so I'd refrain if I were you, lest you make an even bigger buffoon out of yourself.
    1
  9.  @thomascochrane3100  I've seen this comment on tens of videos at this point, but not once has anyone replied to me when I countered it. Duffers.
    1
  10. Much more than the number of anti-ship missiles in the entire UK Navy surface fleet (including the F-35B) because the former is >0 while the latter is 0.
    1
  11. Indian Government spends $250 Billion each year on taking care of its poor people. Spends $72 Billion on military because we have multiple existential threats that are nuclear armed. Spends $1.5 Billion on space tech that actually ends up helping the poor fishermen and farmers. Meanwhile your government spends ~$50 Million not on "development aid to India", that is what they disguise it as. The money goes to NGOs in India that use a small part of it to maintain the cover that its development aid while the lion's share of this money is used to mobilize NGOs that protest against every single infrastructure project of national importance in India. UK does this to hamper India's economic progress while giving its citizens the illusion of "helping India". UK does this after centuries of robbing, de-industrializing and dividing India. So imagine how it would feel if multiple 1/2wits like you are found under every video commenting about how India is only successful due to Britain's aid and because of Britain looting India and how India should be thankful for it.
    1
  12. No. It has got escorts and fighters onboard that can actually fire anti-ship missiles. But the UK Navy sadly doesn't because all their Harpoons of their Destroyers and Frigates retired and their F-35B can only attack ships with bombs right now. If I were you, I'd be calling a call center right now to ask for a fix to UK's abysmal condition.
    1
  13. Indian Government spends $250 Billion each year on taking care of its poor people. Spends $72 Billion on military because we have multiple existential threats that are nuclear armed. Spends $1.5 Billion on space tech that actually ends up helping the poor fishermen and farmers. Meanwhile your government spends ~$50 Million not on "development aid to India", that is what they disguise it as. The money goes to NGOs in India that use a small part of it to maintain the cover that its development aid while the lion's share of this money is used to mobilize NGOs that protest against every single infrastructure project of national importance in India. UK does this to hamper India's economic progress while giving its citizens the illusion of "helping India". UK does this after centuries of robbing, de-industrializing and dividing India. So imagine how it would feel if multiple 1/2wits like you are found under every video commenting about how India is only successful due to Britain's aid and because of Britain looting India and how India should be thankful for it.
    1
  14.  @Jin-Ro  India has been operating carriers since the 1960s continuously. And have used them effectively in a war to blockade an entire country's coastline, liberate that country from its genocidal occupiers and do so in the face of the Americans who sent their 7th fleet to intimidate India (even as everyone in USA other than White House cried out against that decision, including the American diplomats in that region).
    1
  15. First subsidize your fleet. Its pathetic to see the UK Navy surface fleet that can't sink anything over-the horizon because they got no over-the horizon missiles. Meanwhile we got absolute monster supersonic cruise missiles that will sink most Navies in the world without contest.
    1
  16.  @martindornan1667  Congratulations? ....
    1
  17. UK will lose. They got no anti-ship missile capability in their entire fleet, including the F-35B. Its all planned to come a few years later. In the meanwhile, Indian BrahMos missiles will eat UK ships for lunch. And then the Chinese will come and eat us all up. So better to stay friends and attack the Chinese instead.
    1
  18.  @karanvarma4843  When its a foreign navy its "ofcourse they have issues" and when its us its "why are there issues"? Bit of a double standard there mate.
    1
  19. First of all, you aren't still sending it to India. But beyond that: Indian Government spends $250 Billion each year on taking care of its poor people. Spends $72 Billion on military because we have multiple existential threats that are nuclear armed. Spends $1.5 Billion on space tech that actually ends up helping the poor fishermen and farmers. Meanwhile your government spends ~$50 Million not on "development aid to India", that is what they disguise it as. The money goes to NGOs in India that use a small part of it to maintain the cover that its development aid while the lion's share of this money is used to mobilize NGOs that protest against every single infrastructure project of national importance in India. UK does this to hamper India's economic progress while giving its citizens the illusion of "helping India". UK does this after centuries of robbing, de-industrializing and dividing India. So imagine how it would feel if multiple 1/2wits like you are found under every video commenting about how India is only successful due to Britain's aid and because of Britain looting India and how India should be thankful for it.
    1
  20. Not wife. Dog. UK is USA's dog. And a useless one at that because its all bark and no bite. The entire UK not having BMD capability. The entire UK surface fleet not having a single anti-ship missile in service, neither on the Destroyers and Frigates whose Harpoons retired without replacement, nor on the F-35B that aren't slated to get them for some more time now, so right now they only got bombs and AAMs. Yet half the comments in this comment section have a Johnny's-head-in-the-air syndrome.
    1
  21. <India gets a new carrier> This dude: caRrIerS arE pRolIFEraTinG. ^someone tell this man India has been operating carriers continuously since the 1960s.
    1
  22.  @rudrakshsinghkatal5609  They are doing it even though it hasn't happened. These people are shameless. Did you know the entire UK Navy surface fleet has got NO anti-ship missiles in service right now and for the current decade? Their Harpoons for their Destroyers and Frigates just retired without replacement and their F-35B can't do anything other than AMRAAM, ASRAAM and bombs. And these people want to talk $hit about the Indian Navy where more than half the ships have BrahMos.
    1
  23.  @malcpaul996  Indian Government spends $250 Billion each year on taking care of its poor people. Spends $72 Billion on military because we have multiple existential threats that are nuclear armed. Spends $1.5 Billion on space tech that actually ends up helping the poor fishermen and farmers. Meanwhile your government spends ~$50 Million not on "development aid to India", that is what they disguise it as. The money goes to NGOs in India that use a small part of it to maintain the cover that its development aid while the lion's share of this money is used to mobilize NGOs that protest against every single infrastructure project of national importance in India. UK does this to hamper India's economic progress while giving its citizens the illusion of "helping India". UK does this after centuries of robbing, de-industrializing and dividing India. So imagine how it would feel if multiple 1/2wits like you are found under every video commenting about how India is only successful due to Britain's aid and because of Britain looting India and how India should be thankful for it.
    1
  24. Say hello to reality:- Your entire surface fleet has ZERO anti-ship missile capability. Harpoons of your Destroyers and Frigates all retired without replacement for the decade. And your F-35B can only drop bombs onto ships because they got no anti-ship missiles. Meanwhile half the Indian fleet is bristling with deadly supersonic cruise missiles. Indian destroyers are superior to your Type 45, so no thanks. Come back when your destroyers have a Cooperative Engagement Capability or a 4 panel Gallium Arsenide AESA radar or a Supersonic Cruise Missile like BrahMos or a single-tier Ballistic Missile Defence capability or ability to carry two helicopters. Oh wait, by the time you get those things on your destroyers, we will have our next class of destroyers ready with 120+ VLS, a 6-meter Gallium Nitride AESA radar, a TWO-tier Ballistic Missile Defence Capability and a Hypersonic Cruise Missile. . Now seethe and cope.
    1
  25.  @davidhouseman4328  Will retire within months and interim replacement cancelled. No AShM for most of this decade.
    1
  26.  @davidhouseman4328  I don't want to talk Navy with a man who calls for replacing an already lemon Harpoon with an even more lemon missile like the Sea Venom with its range at 20km. You can take on Pirate Motherships with that thing. Not Navies. Clown act.
    1
  27.  @davidhouseman4328  Aye its an anti-ship missile. But its not an anti-navy ship missile. But you seem to disagree so good luck mounting that 20 km range missile on your helicopter and sending it within 20km of an enemy Navy vessel hoping it survives, lol. Having a Brit here desperately trying to convince me that having a 20km range missile means that UK does indeed have anti-ship missiles kind of proves my point. But in your words, you proved me wrong. So revel in that in the same ignorance displayed by half the Brits in this comment section who claim that their Navy is "light years ahead of Indian Navy". There are Pakistani level of delusions lol.
    1
  28. Waiting on the Russians to supply the damned aviation complex parts they were contracted to build.
    1
  29. Indian destroyers are superior to your Type 45, so no thanks. Come back when your destroyers have a Cooperative Engagement Capability or a 4 panel Gallium Arsenide AESA radar or a Supersonic Cruise Missile like BrahMos or a single-tier Ballistic Missile Defence capability or ability to carry two helicopters. Oh wait, by the time you get those things on your destroyers, we will have our next class of destroyers ready with 120+ VLS, a 6-meter Gallium Nitride AESA radar, a TWO-tier Ballistic Missile Defence Capability and a Hypersonic Cruise Missile. So yeah, we don't actually need your destroyer tech. We are interested in your submarine tech though. Game?
    1
  30. LMAO. Better take a look at your navy first boy. Your entire Surface Fleet has ZERO anti-ship missile capability. Your F-35B can only use bombs to attack surface targets for now and your destroyers and frigates are naked without their Harpoon anti-ship armament that just retired and its got no replacement in this decade. Meanwhile half the Indian ships carry the absolutely formidable BrahMos supersonic cruise missile. And you want to talk about "Indian quality". Where is British brain in the decision making? Duffers.
    1
  31. Yeah, MiG-29K is a $hitty aircraft about to get booted out of the Indian Navy, but hey, at least it can fire an actual anti-ship missile. Meanwhile your British F-35B are roaming in the skies trying to drop bombs onto the ships because they got no AShMissiles yet. And your destroyers and frigates are the same. Harpoon retired and no replacement planend within this decade. Meanwhile Indian ships are bristling with the supersonic cruise missile BrahMos, BMD capable SAM Barak-8, better AESA radar and Cooperative Engagement Capability that UK T45 class doesn't have. Now that is what I call lopsided.
    1
  32. Tell that its a coastal patrol to the Pakistanis who till recently didn't even have surface to air missiles on their ships.
    1
  33. You lay off the stolen tea Brit. Your entire surface fleet has ZERO anti-ship missile capability. Harpoons of your Destroyers and Frigates all retired without replacement for the decade. And your F-35B can only drop bombs onto ships because they got no anti-ship missiles. Meanwhile half the Indian fleet is bristling with deadly supersonic cruise missiles. Indian destroyers are superior to your Type 45, so no thanks. Come back when your destroyers have a Cooperative Engagement Capability or a 4 panel Gallium Arsenide AESA radar or a Supersonic Cruise Missile like BrahMos or a single-tier Ballistic Missile Defence capability or ability to carry two helicopters. Oh wait, by the time you get those things on your destroyers, we will have our next class of destroyers ready with 120+ VLS, a 6-meter Gallium Nitride AESA radar, a TWO-tier Ballistic Missile Defence Capability and a Hypersonic Cruise Missile.
    1
  34. By same logic, entire UK Navy surface fleet lacks teeth for this decade because neither their shiny new F-35B nor their frigates and destroyers have any anti-ship missile capability right now. Their Harpoons are also retired. So yeah, before $hitting on your own Navy's capabilities, do check how much of the others' are just marketing bluster.
    1
  35. We got the toilets already done back in 2019 my guy. You worry about not having a single anti-ship missile in your entire Royal Navy surface fleet including the F-35B. You worry about not having a single space launch vehicle. You worry about not having anti-satellite weapons. You worry about not having Cooperative Engagement Capability on your destroyers. You worry about not having a three or even two-tier BMD capability. You worry about the Pakistanis infiltrating your country and targeting your families. You worry about your energy bills and inflation breaking all past records. You worry about the karma of the British Raj catching up to your kind. You've got a lot to worry already so don't waste your breath worrying about us.
    1