Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Voice is about whether your ancestors have ‘been here longer’ than anyone else" video.

  1. Yes that is absolutely correct. It is acknowledging the original inhabitants. Well done James there maybe hope for you yet.
    3
  2.  @monteforae8077  Study totally debunked.
    1
  3.  @positivepawpaw7564  The 33 billion dollar figure is a complete lie and has been fully debunked. It is cited by ignorant people unaware of the facts. The current direct funding to the NIAA as per the last budget is $4.2 billion. You are a liar.
    1
  4.  @r1nkyd1nk66  common fucking sense.
    1
  5.  @ch33psk8  Read the last budget papers if you are capable.
    1
  6.  @ch33psk8  I have responded to this on numerous occasions. So nobody disputes the various DNA make-up of indigenous Australians. As we moved out of Africa we mixed with Neanderthals and denisovans. So there are bits of both DNA in Homo sapiens There is literally absolutely zero zilch evidence of any human species inhabitanting the Australian mainland before the aboriginal. None .
    1
  7.  @ch33psk8  The oldest known human remains ever found in Australia are homo sapien. This argument you are attempting was put forward by Keith Windshuttle and his ilk in an attempt to discredit Mabo and Wik. It failed abysmally then as it does now. Next.
    1