Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Voice to Parliament will ‘divide’ Australians by ‘race’" video.

You misunderstand the difference between political representation and constitutional recognition. Your argument is a strawman and fallacious.
1
All the details. https://voice.niaa.gov.au/final-report. You made several fallacious comments. Read the attached report.
1
Here is all the detail you need. https://voice.niaa.gov.au/final-report
1
@jimlofts5433 So if I'm going to choose between 6 constitutional law experts one of whom is the distinguished Anne Twomey who all agree the voice cant be a third chamber and you and your uninformed opinion, you lose hands down. Your opinion is less than worthless.
1
@jimlofts5433 So your failed argument when shown up to be completely fallacious you then decide to go down the emotive argument and just throw out the word racism like some mindless woke teenager without a shred of evidence. Nothing you have said has any substance to whatsoever.
1
@jimlofts5433 Of course you will. No reason required. No amount of detail or explanation of why a voice isn't a third chamber would ever have been sufficient.
1
@jimlofts5433 So 285 elders representing aboriginals from every group and region who signed the Uluru statement after several years of debate and consultation across the entire are all inner city lefties Once again your argument just doesn't stack up. It just reeks of a terrified privileged person afraid of the unknown and to ignorant to seek knowledge.
1