Comments by "MRA" (@yassassin6425) on "How The Apollo Program Came To An End (Space Documentary) | Spark" video.
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
 @NigarButterflyÂ
"just a lie! It the take off was not thought over,it would have been arraised from the video"
You are actually attempting to suggest that a global hoax staged by the US government and NASA overlooked the fact that in reality there would be no one on the surface to film the lift off of the LM ascent stage? Your stupidity is indeed genuine then. The footage was captured by Ed Fendall in Houston using the remote control on the Lunar Rover camera and beamed by to earth via S Band. It was first attempted during Apollo 15, then 16, and they finally compensated for the delay and timed it perfectly during the lift of of Apollo 17's LM upper stage. Incidentally, I think you meant 'erased'.
"and yes, all the original footage is lost, wow, they keep hours and hours of useless footage,and the most important one was lost?"
No it wasn't. The Apollo 11 "missing tapes" were those that were recorded from Apollo 11's slow-scan television (SSTV) telecast in its raw format on telemetry data tape at the time of the first Moon landing in 1969.. The data tapes were used to record all transmitted data (video as well as telemetry) and were backed up, therefore the originals were erased. You are aware that there were five further landings after Apollo 11? Of course you weren't.
"If it was thought over to be put in the "evidence" then its for people who dont think for themselves, and believe everything hey were told by media. And in that case they are straight laughing at our faces. Not mine, though."
Because of course the online conspiracy theory that you mindlessly parrot is unfailingly accurate, not in the least bit deceptive, exploitative, manipulative and opportunistic, and with your best interests at heart, completely free of agenda and ulterior motive? Ok then.
The known science of Apollo is nothing to do with mainstream media perpetuation. It is quite clear that you have zero knowledge about the history, the science and the technology of the programme. The junk online conspiracy theory that you consume and regurgitate online that substitutes for this, targets the gullible, the dim and the scientifically illiterate such as yourself - it harvests stupidity such as your own and as the low hanging fruit, you are ripe for their plucking. And yes, they are the ones "laughing in your face".
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
 @trendynow1369Â
Your comment is shadow banned, which is a shame because such stupidity on show may actually deter others from similarly entertaining such nonsense. I will summarise here:
"Yet there's no real photo of the earth from space. All the ones that were claimed to be real are obviously fraudulent."
Because again, you are the self-proclaimed expert, you know better? There are something in the region of 18,000 pictures taken of the earth by the Apollo missions alone that you would have had to sift through. 'Earthrise' captured by Apollo 8 and 'The Blue Marble' taken by the crew of Apollo 17 are not simply famous photos, but are amongst the most widely distributed pictures of all time. And since then, while some of the autonomous spacecraft destined for other worlds turned their sensors around for a parting shot, their cameras weren’t designed for the job, producing inferior images. In contrast, as the Apollo astronauts travelled out towards the Moon, they reached the perfect distances for planetary portraiture and were provided with some of the world’s best equipment for photographing Earth: Hasselblad 500 EL cameras, Zeiss lenses and 70mm Kodak Ektachrome film. They were thus able to faithfully record Earth’s true colours as they appeared to the human eye.
The last image of the whole Earth taken by a human being, during Apollo 17, on the 17th December 1972. However, sitting in geosynchronous oribit, 22,000 miles from out planet Himawari-8 captures a full-disk image of Earth every 10 minutes.
"Keep believing the lies instead of trusting your own eyes"
As I said,, I am irrelevant to this exchange and at no stage have I mentioned any 'belief' - far less my own The known science that you detest is not about that. That would be the junk online conspiracy theory that you gullibly consume and regurgitate in a lame attempt to sound informed, discerning and clever.
2
-
1