Comments by "Ameni0" (@Layde36) on "French ambassador: US 'rules-based order' means Western domination, violating international law" video.

@josephdewuhan well it's to be expected by this point sadly, i don't want to quote Orwell as he was a neocon himself but he was right about 1984 in some aspects i say and we are seeing it's results here now
8
@alicec6459 i overall didn't like bens take on referring to the Quincy institute and whatever ideals they may claim, i mean these institutes are directly paid by the government at some cases or via oligarchs so seeing ben tell his subs to refer to them without being critical is off putting to say the least, i mean it's overall a civil war here with people either being left or on the right or being anti country overall so we need to learn about the objectives of the people whom ben refers to as they may not always be reliable, especially this ambassador as i claimed is anti Russian but pro Chinese which Ben did refer to but didn't put enough attention on that topic, hopefully he does call out the hypocrisy of that french ambassador before it's too late , i seen western countries use the narrative that they need to be against any country and if they feel they are pushed into a corner by their people they will divert their attention to other countries like with Iran i mean people learning about Azovs and Banderites in Ukraine now are focused on anti china or Anti Iran propaganda so the people viewpoints are being diverted for western interests especially when the left is very vulnerable to this and instead of thinking about the contradictions they are just jumping in this bandwagon due to the fact everyone is doing it
2
Well this ambassador is quite pro china but anti russian and its obvious with how he continues to push war against the middle east, these people are no different than maga communists who push fake communism as to divert the war onto other nations instead, but i guess all that money spent in the military got to be used on some country right? dissapointed in ben for supporting this institute which is obviously paid by french oligarchs, the west needs to leave the global market if it just continues to diverts war onto other nations instead of stopping it altogether for good, dont be fooled by these peoples words its obvious their intent is to continue wars whether its the middle east or china or russia
2
Well this ambassador is quite pro china but anti russian and its obvious with how he continues to push war against the middle east, these people are no different than maga communists who push fake communism as to divert the war onto other nations instead, but i guess all that money spent in the military got to be used on some country right? dissapointed in ben for supporting this institute which is obviously paid by french oligarchs, the west needs to leave the global market if it just continues to diverts war onto other nations instead of stopping it altogether for good, dont be fooled by these peoples words its obvious their intent is to continue wars whether its the middle east or china or russia
1
@alicec6459 i said so these westerners doesn't matter which side they are from whether the left or right they still will be against foreign countries if they feel their higher position is taken away from them, US is currently loosing it's stake on the global market and we might either see Russia or China although it's most likely China will be at the top, the point is the fact that the west is afraid of losing its position and will do anything even risk a nuclear catastrophe at this point if it means the wealthy would have their position of power undisturbed, same thing with Russia or China if they feel their position is taken they will retaliate, the best at this point is for people to not take sides altogether and be critical of any sides as bureaucracy is continuing in all nations doesn't matter if it's the US or Russia or China looking to wage war, this war even if ended will probably continue on some other foreign nation and probably will only end if the system is revised
1
@alicec6459 if I'm honest overall it's more about the fact that people are separated by cultural and social differences with each nations, i don't like the Sharia law in Iran and restrictions put on women but that politics is used as a guise to invade foreign nations and I see this tactic applied everywhere almost and in history throughout, yes cultural differences are something that will be there but instead of trying to understand all the aspects and analysis of that culture we just don't accept it overall and wage war like we did with Iraq or Afghanistan or other middle Eastern countries, i mean if those countries have flaws which harm their populace the people of those nations are the ones to change their culture not foreign powers who have no proper understanding of that culture, but we still waged a war anyways and the people gained nothing but their nations in turmoil in a worse situation than before, let's be real people in modern times when it comes to survival aren't going to associate themselves with culture or ideology or any sorts of ideas, many just want their economic condition to be better as possible and culture comes secondary here, and this financial war is something that is the main crux here which countries are trying to get a hold of, people are controlled in the sense that those who never think out of their heads or incentivised to think about controversial topics are used for their voices as to carry out actions which benefits the rich and those who are smart enough to understand or maybe remain critical are censored off social media and their voices clouded under the voices of the illiterate masses, like with the Ukraine war which those who are smart and know about rising Nazism never talk about it as doing so will either get their position they enjoy in life stripped or censored if they talk about it, modern times don't live for expressing ideas which even if controversial are discussed regardless and they only live for convenience and fear of losing that position
1
@alicec6459 well think about it in this way, i seen criticisms from western sources about China regarding why they feel its authoritarian, many feel the problem lies in the surveillance program China has and it is considered controversial with how it will be used, although it is understandable with how western neoliberal shock therapy it caused the collapse of the Soviet Union and western ideology trying to influence the Chinese people against their governments, but people also feel such programmes will be used against the people and it would be devastating with the wrong hands especially when Americans already have experienced it with Snowden whistleblowing about NSA surveillance systems and how some of them were used maliciously including millions of peoples private data being sold, although we haven't seen anything like that in China the problem still stays especially among the elite, it is to be seen with how they proceed with this program but currently people rather prefer the old system which even if it has flaws does not risk everyones privacy, China does have a big responsibility with foreign countries which are relying on them for their sustenance and they fear if it would end up being the same like with the US which people obviously don't want anything like that happening, overall the people i feel should get to know more about governments inworkings as they feel isolated from them here and with foreign countries they don't trust or know anything about it will be difficult to say the least, overall i feel countries should be allowed to implement whichever system they feel suits them without bringing harm to their own populace or them being monopolised in any manner and if superpowers like China or Russia or other nations implement their systems right without any damages to their own populace in any way they feel then sure they can go for it
1
@alicec6459 remember this point in history the power vacuum if left by the US will be vulnerable for others powers to take and if not handled carefully will risk nuclear conflicts, Russia and China don't seek nuclear escalation but the fear is there if the west continually pushes them to a corner
1
well for their own agenda really, dont be fooled by any of them its obvious they are just replacing the warmongering position that will be left behind once this is over, they already have spent all their resources on military and choose to use it on any nation whether its the middle east or china or russia or the balkan states, its obvious we are living in a war economy at least in the west but china is slowly diverting away from it i guess
1