Comments by "ricardo kowalski" (@ricardokowalski1579) on "Why the Indian Computer Failed" video.

government mandated monopoly fails to develop competitive products? WoW, who knew?
91
@r.r.r.918 @r.r.r.918 you DID see the videos about Daewoo and Hyunday? All state protected, corrupt, uncompetitive monsters.
2
@gikigill788 "responsible for modern tech"? maybe you can't cherry pick the technologies that PRIVATE COMPANIES then made into products what about the Super sonic transport? or the unducted fan? the fact that private entrepeneurs find value in the scrap heap of NASA does not mean that NASA is a "success"
2
@gikigill788 First things first, we must use the correct words >>>> monopsony A monopsony is a market condition in which there is only one buyer, the monopsonist. <<< Secondly, you can't buy your personal MLRS because government forbids it. All these deformities of the markets are created by violent government coercion. So, pray do tell, how is a >monopsony< in disagreement with my comment on >monopolies< ?
1
@ishikinokami1575 NASA succeeded? Have you not seen SpaceX kick their ass?
1
@V1z10n Once again, it didn't work. It didn't work in Russia and it didn't work in Korea Anything "works" if you use taxes to finance and keep alive deadbeat companies. wiki: The Daewoo dissolution and corruption scandal was a 1999–2006 scandal in South Korea involving the bankruptcy of Daewoo, then-country's second largest company, and a subsequent corruption investigation, involving arrests, escapes and eventual conviction of dozens of company's top executives. The resulting scandal has been described as one of the biggest scandals in South Korea please watch the asinometry videos about Daewoo and Hyunday before defending government ownership of the means of production
1