Comments by "0IIIIII" (@0IIIIII) on "Homeowner arrested after standoff with alleged squatter" video.
-
21
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jumboshrimps4498 ok little bro. Let me explain to you why tenant rights are important. If you’re renting a place from me, the law says I need to give you notice if I want to kick you out. This is to protect you from being homeless. As well, if we have a lease, saying you are entitled to reside here for a set duration, then I likewise can’t uproot your life or break the lease without a legal agreement saying so. Think about what would happen to you if these tenant laws didn’t exist. Imagine you, being thrown out on the street with all your stuff, and not having anywhere else to live. That would be bad for you. That is why tenant laws exist, to protect you and society from other people.
Now, the squatters are people who are claiming to be legit tenants, so that they enjoy rights to inhabit, but not actually pay for them. Unfortunately, this is difficult to prove to cops who show up. So, the only solution is, to go to court, make your case to a judge, and then get a judgement in your favor, then the cops will remove the squatters and maybe even garnish the squatter’s wages as recompense.
You have options to deal with squatters, you just have to follow the laws, which exist to protect innocent people, despite the fact that squatters may exploit them. Does that make sense to you?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@willdejong7763 interesting idea but I foresee a few problems. Firstly leases are not recorded in the local registry of deeds or government. Should they be? Maybe? But that creates expense, can lead to government bloat, and then what happens if one party fails to file? What happens then? We’d be right back to where we started, right back in an unknown property dispute.
Secondly, while these squatters are usually breaking the law pretty flippantly, and perhaps as you allude to, landlords who attempt to fleece legal tenants can expect harsh fines to discourage this, not all cases are so black and white. A lot of times they’re pretty morally and legally grey. So what then? In an edge case, should a questionable tenant be allowed to be made homeless even in uncertain circumstances?
And likewise, should a “counter-sued” landlord who narrowly loses their case be forced to pay $100k (!!!), over a tenant, who may in fact be as big a dirtbag as the more obvious squatters? No, I think not. I think our current system is pretty good.
This landlady has options. She can go to court, get an eviction, the squatters will be gone. She can still do that. That is the only just and effective way to do this, in the effort to protect all innocent parties and punish the wrongdoers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1