Comments by "Ronin Dave" (@RoninDave) on ""Good Guys With Guns" Often Do More Harm Than Good" video.

  1. We're dealing with selfish children on the slow side who are cheering a bad guy getting shot as he was leaving the site of his mass murder having finished what he set out to do as far as we know just so they can keep their guns which were never in danger of being taken in the first place.
    15
  2. ah, but everything goes into Matrix slo-mo and he shoots as you dodge before you expertly hit him in the head before doing a flip and looking oh-so cool in the process - at least I think that's what these nuts think will happen
    5
  3. trying to find a silver lining in a turd doesn't change the turd from being a turd
    5
  4. +Ken Belangel you must have graduated at the top of a class of one
    3
  5. +nexus1g and nothing happened thus proving my point. Stop wasting my time with your NRA-parrotted rhetoric
    3
  6. +X-Files A what about it? I give the guy props for trying but this still shows the realism of many of these incidences - too little too late as he shot the shooter after he left the church and the shooter still got away
    2
  7. news flash individual rights have already been eroded since 911 and your precious guns did fuck-all to stop it
    2
  8. hyperbole is lost on the literal minded
    2
  9. learn to read, Boris. I wrote - "as far as we know" but it is true he was leaving the church having done the violence he had wanted to do when he was shot.
    2
  10. +nexus1g machine guns were banned in 34 and assault weapons in 94 there was no mass gun ban/grab following it hence there is no danger that their precious guns are in danger of being confiscated.
    2
  11. +Michael Thor babbling assumptions do not an argument make
    2
  12. so they might as well not have had a weapon then since it didn't do any good
    1
  13. except the shooter had already left the church. Whether he was going to continue on his shooting spree is speculative. the real issue as it always is is the easy obtainability of firearms that people like the shooter is able to get their hands on so readily
    1
  14. *nexus1g because it was pedantically pointless as most of your points are
    1
  15. +nexus1g be boringly pointless elsewhere, will you? 1) the regulations you state had no further impact on the possession of guns so your point proves my original point of no danger towards guns. Therefore your point is pointless. 2) Feinstein is one person and she was not referring to all guns only assault weapons. This is a lie perpetuated by the NRA crowd. Now, either you are mistaken by her statement made when you were no doubt in diapers or you are deliberately spreading this lie. So which is it? A mistake or a lie? It certainly isn't the truth.
    1
  16. +nexus1g that is nothing to do with my point of the non-existent danger of guns ever being taken away in the first place. As I said, you are boringly pointless with delusions that you are clever. Nothing what you dribbled in any way addressed anything I wrote. You could have saved us all this wasted time by staying blissfully mute, you disingenuous little shit.
    1
  17. you have nothing of value worth considering as your "points" prove my points or nothing at all except to stroke your ego in deluding yourself into thinking you are being clever. Previous regulations did not lead to any universal gun bans nor was Feinstein talking about anything other than assault weapons so you bringing her up was pointless as everything else you have brought up.
    1
  18. it gives certain ones an excuse to gun down people citing concern that they have a gun which is something police can't do in other countries
    1
  19. +Baulbustor where did you read that Michael wrote the shooter was about to turn himself in? Reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strongpoint. The shooter got away and killed himself. we don't know if he was going to kill more people or himself as he ended up doing.
    1