Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. They got 20 Himars. And the russians suffer huge losses. Imagine what 100 van do
    10
  2. Realy. And what is your evidence for that
    10
  3. Sure kid even putler only claims 1.500 per year. Meaning the reality is much less. Dont fall for such stupid numbers
    10
  4. Nobpdy said so kid
    10
  5. He never said that.
    10
  6. Yes oryx. Counting losses by visual evidence. What a great website
    9
  7. Nobody said they are out of tanks
    9
  8. Is russia in Kiew yet.
    8
  9.  @mrmacias4217  histerical laughing is a sign of brainwashed people when confirmed with reality. It is a strategy to avoid acceptance
    8
  10.  @sovietkrab1871  ukraine should have fallen in a week and the russians should have gained Air supieriority within the First days. But they didnt. Because they are unable to perform Sead Missions and combined arms Operations.
    8
  11. What did we actually learned. Motivated people on the ground, and 2 % of Nato budget is enough to push back mighty russia
    7
  12. Russia cancelled the delivery of t90 tanks to at least 3 countries. Also they asked belarus for tanks as well. So it is obvios that they running short in tanks as well. CC never said anything about one side is winning or not. You said that. But it is Remarque how little the russians succeded in the last mounths.
    7
  13. So that is why himars destroid a s400 comand Center yesterday
    7
  14. Dont forget that russia had a active tank fleet something between 2500 and 3000. They replace newer models like t80 t90 and older t72 with very old t64 and t62
    7
  15. Funny how guys like you think russia is a perfect system that instantly fixes stuff
    7
  16. Accourding to who? Your Favoriten spokesmen of the kremlin.
    7
  17. Kid, do you actually know when and in what Situation this occured
    7
  18. Another kremlin bot
    7
  19. Realy. Where, and what is your evidence
    7
  20. No kid. Just numbers confirmed by pictures
    7
  21. Oryx stoped because they where not paid for this stuff and ran out of time to do it. And what the heek is your evidence for 8000 losses for ukraine. That is like they lost everything they had and recieved, plus more.
    7
  22. Nobody ever said that kid. But why do you have to walk to bro Kim if everything is fine 😘
    7
  23. Your number of 12.000 t90/t80 is a pire fantasy number with no evidence to back it up
    7
  24. Yeah. Because we demilitarised after 1990 and instead focused on infrastructure and welfare. Now north korea is a sadly poor country witch a starving population, while we have everything
    6
  25. Another russian bot
    6
  26.  @ForSteam-k6y  I answered your problem about how so few t72s are pulled from storage
    6
  27. Why. Still the russians dont advance and ukraine makes small gains
    6
  28. You didnt even watched the video mate. Otherwise you would know thst He never proclaimed that russia should have run out by anything by now.
    6
  29. Because ukraine has airdefence, they can Intercept fast missles. Planes are easeir
    6
  30. The storage numbers you claimed turned out to be completly false. And in terms of production you just make up dumb numbers. Not even russia themself clsim such numbers
    6
  31. Which country is that supposed to be
    6
  32. It is time for an Update.
    6
  33.  @kevin5073  because people are not automaticly lyong just because you dont like it. If you can proof that they are lying, go for it. Until you cannot do this, I Trust this so far very accurate and widly accepted source. Their purpose is information. Not an agenda
    6
  34. Well IT did. The Moskwa sank Kid 😘
    6
  35. The thing is, we dont know how many of them are actually able to go to battle. They might be looted for spareparts
    6
  36. So that is why they now buy ammonition from north korea?
    6
  37.  @schutzanzug4518  that is incredible ignorant and dumb. If I melt down a Lamborghini and get the Metall for the New one, do I already have paied for half the Lamborghini?
    6
  38. So that is why russia throws hundreds of vehicles and tens of thousands of troops in certain death
    5
  39. Problem is how many can they make
    5
  40. Nope. Russias shelling droped to an all time low. And they have to buy from north korea
    5
  41.  @krislalone4160  what is there so hard to understand. Russia was weak at the beginning of the war. Now they brought insane amounts of vehicles and artillery from starage into the fight. Then they are stronger then in the beginning. Easy to understand
    5
  42. Nope excactly what is in the title. How is this depot doing
    5
  43. And they lied. They destroyed basicly every City in their occupied areas. And of course you are submitted to their propaganda aperatus living there
    5
  44. They absolutly need it. They havent achieved airsuprimacy in almost 2 years. Wich is embarrassing
    5
  45. Actually less
    5
  46. Nah kid. Just information
    5
  47. And yet they used basicly every wapon in their arsenal except nukes. Their most modern tank t90m already aaw many actions. Many are destroyed. So your comment is bs
    5
  48. How is russia doing? Not even 20% occupied area.
    5
  49. Well no kiddo. The source is satalite pictures. Your ignorance is stunning
    5
  50.  @generalscathach6452  russia isnt chooking our economy. Besides Gas and oil we dont realy import anything of them. Interests rates fall, inflation caused mainly by covid 19 fell to pre war conditions and all around europe and america we have economy growth again. Russia on the other side has an inflation of almost 50% compared pre war, and russia has to spend half its budget on war next year, meaning they hardly invest anything in infrstructure. Also they clsim themself to have the worst workforce shortage since 1995. Going not so bad ey
    5
  51. And you know this cause you have tried it.? Russian steel rusts Luke every other.
    5
  52. Well not neccesaerly bit they thought that the ukranian army is incspable of fighting like in 2014
    5
  53.  @aniksamiurrahman6365  you should watch it in total, all He does is counting vehicles from satalite pictures. Again. Your comment in the first place was nonsense, cause on no point russia is close to run out of anything. He clearly says russia has still a lot of stuff left
    5
  54. He does. He can count
    5
  55. True. We must increase the production
    5
  56. Take claims about losses with a grain of Salt. But yea russia is scrapping the borrom of the Barrel here
    5
  57. Nope. We see
    5
  58. You didnt watched the video kid.
    5
  59. One year later, it would be very interresting to revisit those sites
    5
  60. Cause they could. That thins got shot down
    5
  61. After their Military fails so bad in ukraine. I dont think so
    5
  62. The bots get desperate😂
    5
  63. They did not had 12.000 tanks. Also dont forget, many tanks are rusted or looted for parts
    5
  64. Well propably you are a russian fanboy sucking in the worldpower propaganda of the kremlin. Facts dont care about your feelings
    5
  65. No kid numbers confirmed by satalite
    5
  66. Well little Ivan. Those are the confirmed by picture and footage ones. Of course the dictator in the kremlin is far more believable one as open source intellegence
    5
  67. Wow 3600 a year. So why did putin only claimed 1400. Oh btw. The US tanks worked quiet Well in both iraq wars. With less than 50 tank losses in both wars
    5
  68. Whats wrong with that. Dosnt change the numbers
    5
  69. You literly can buy those pictures yourself
    5
  70.  @kingjehukhan8541  😅😅😅 Is that the only thing you guys can say. That myth didnt even came from ukraine itself. It was an internet legend. Still umthe ukrainian airforce is commiting missions right now in the south. Wether you like it or not kid
    4
  71. @Fighter4Street nope cabal doesnt say that in his Videos. Stop lying. Your Personal Bias doesnt change what he says. He observes the change in russian dwpots and those are simple facts. He doesnt say anything about winning or loosing.
    4
  72. He didnt claim such thing even a year ago
    4
  73. Yes because conventional wars are different to insurgencies. And us didnt lost. They just left
    4
  74. There was a huge demilitarization in Nato since 1990
    4
  75. Russia still doesnt have air superiority. They csnt bomb cities. And still ukrines airforce and airdefence is working. Cope your copebubble
    4
  76. They anihilated mariopol, bachmut and other cities. They shelled them with artillery, and used phosphor and cluster bombs in cities. Russia doesnt care about civilians.
    4
  77. What is this comparison supposedto mean. Speed of aircraft is almost irelevant. What matters is acuracy, communication, tactics and morale. Yes the russianshave hypersonic wapons. Those are just realy fast bombs, which are Hard to shot down. As soon as they hit, they are just another 500 kg bomb. Also they are dozens of times more expansive, Meaning you cant produce them in masses. Whst matters is how much material you can Put on the Ground a few thousand advanced anti tank wapons can have a mich larger impact than the entire arsenal of hypersonic wapons
    4
  78. Yeah it is. Most their planes are older than 30 years
    4
  79. No they do not have them. Every plane is listed and also known to intelegence services
    4
  80. Yeah yeah. Religios cults always promiss u doomsday. Still waiting for it
    4
  81. Pro russian fashist propaganda. Truth watch: covert cabal
    4
  82. Ah so their fighter jets launching from parking lots ha?
    4
  83.  @2sqnbandit379  advancing on All fronts means like a few Meter anywhere and adjivka Held for 9 mounths and is not even half taken. You seem to misunderstand how a successfull advance should look like. At this pace they will reach kiyv in 700 years
    4
  84. 😂😂😂. Wow. So ukraine had hundreds of Patriot systems
    4
  85. Let me get this straight. You are happy about the possibility of a defending country to loose
    4
  86. I honestly would doubt that iraq Had a much weaker military. In Terms of Numbers no. Also equipment was mich more numeros. Anti air for example. They had around 200 anti air sides. With almost 20.000 missles. Thats something
    4
  87. Well that is a rough estimate. But yeah the numbers are higher
    4
  88. Another russian troll account
    4
  89. For example
    4
  90. How are they losing. They right now tske more territory than russia did in half a year
    4
  91. You clearly disnt watched the video kid
    4
  92. ​ @KolyaUrtz 95 %😂 Sure my boy. Its not like we know they lost already 1/3of all the tanks they have
    4
  93. Not from many sources. Excactly one source. The russian government
    4
  94. Well yes they do. Cause they survived
    4
  95. Well they are far from winning and have to ask north korea for ammunition. Nobody said they will run out of tanks any time soon
    4
  96. Well no. With ukraine air defence still workinh it would be hard
    4
  97. SMO. Common little vatnik. Say it.
    4
  98. Neither. Cause nobody said something like this
    4
  99. Actually we have our strategic reserve left and we increase production
    4
  100. Well covert cabal doesnt say that. He just counts what he sees
    4
  101. and for the l ast 2.5 years he was absolutly accurate...
    4
  102. Well anti invasion should be commin sense. And no. He just counted the artillery
    4
  103. You didnt watched the video did you. He said it is unlikly for russia to run out. And stop falling for the russian puppet
    4
  104. Nope we didnt. We barly gave them 10% of guns. Also we rely not so much on artillery
    4
  105. Well the russians fail right now
    4
  106. 1 year and 4 mounths later. He was right.
    4
  107. Are you aware that israel has nukes.
    4
  108. The advantege is cost and range. Missles are very expansive and and srtillery has a maximum reach of 60 to 80 km. With bombers, as long as the airdefence is destroyed, they can attack large targets for comparable small costs
    4
  109. Well He knows something. Unlike you
    4
  110. Funny little troll. Oryx actually claims ukraine to lost about 60
    4
  111. 😂😂😂. Sure. Did RT told you that number in Person?
    4
  112. ​ @Alien_isolationist he counted those possible in buildings kid. Try again
    4
  113. Wow. Your friends need to take less drugs
    4
  114. ​ @fujifurov671 doesnt matter. Your number is counting on the myth russia had 12.000 tanks to begin with
    4
  115. Well kid. The mighty russian army has advanced like 60 sqkm in 4 mounths. Bad work for the second best army in the world
    4
  116. ​ @kevin5073 yet still. Pictures to count losses is as acurate as we can get.
    4
  117. ​ @archyology this jiggernaut was driven out of the north, cherson and kharkiv and is unable to make any substantial gaines. And now they even loosing ground. Pathetic
    4
  118.  @archyology  the original Design yes. But many of them where produced in the 90s and esrly 2000s. Also tanks dont do Well, if standing outside in siberia for decades
    4
  119. The russian economy has the severest worker shortage since 1995. They lack high tech components. And you can only produce so much tanks. Yes they can techniclyproduce forever. But the question is, is this enough to replace losses.
    4
  120.  @nothere4089  they in fact seem to ran out. They csn produce about 100 per mounth and shot down ones Show production dates in 2022 and 2023. Meaning their older storages are in fact run dry and they reliy on thst what they csn produce
    4
  121. Well everybody know the ukrainian numbers are to high. But evidence by picture is harder to lye by
    4
  122. Difference is. Ukraine didnt start the war. They only defend themself. Ukraine never claimed to be a world power. Russia did
    3
  123.  @MrPaxio  a couple of soildiers? You talk about half a million men and woman, also wounded. Those numbers need food, fuel and clothing. Ect.
    3
  124.  @MrPaxio  absulutly. Ukraine last year purchased wapons and ammonition worth around 3 billion euros. They of course get a lot donated but not everything.
    3
  125. Pay soildiers and buy wapons from all over the world
    3
  126. ​ @Ali-fx6jd little difference. Ukraine never claimed to be a World class military Power. Russia did. Selensky didnt start the war. Putin did.
    3
  127. Absolutly, russia and NK both announced it and even shells with korean paintings appear on social media
    3
  128. That is a stupid thought. Every System is checked on their effectiveness, if they fail nobody buys it
    3
  129. It is not a hypersonic missle. It is a balistic missle. Huge different
    3
  130. Not a single one. But there are about 20.000 International volunteers from ober 60 nations
    3
  131. Their not existing airforce is quiet effektive in the south right now
    3
  132. A fraction😅 dude The russian ground troops are about 400.000 strong only about half of them are fighting personal take the losses and wounded into the Equation and you already now that ukraine outnumber them 3 to 1 only their equipment is supirior but this is shrinking every day as well. We Well see
    3
  133. Easy. Cause they literly sended everything tonthe ukrainian battlefield
    3
  134.  @vasjaforutube1  the iraqy army existed very much. It was one of the lsrgest armys in thr world..
    3
  135. .Easy to explain. The vietnamese aurforce was almost non existant and barly few missions. The USAF flew daily missions and very aggressive. Usually they got shot down by AA missles, not other fighter planes. If you want a true comparisson of air to air war. Look at the itaq iran war. Western modern fighters obliterated tge iraqi airforce.
    3
  136.  @hollywood5274  nice one kid. Whi invaded crimea in 2014. Who send wapons and mercenaries into donbass. Who invaded in 2022. Sorry kid but nobody takes you serios if you claim such dumb stuff
    3
  137. because Iraq at that time was the 4th largedst military power of the world. Including a dense defense network. Afgahnistan was a difficult matter. In fact they were most the times defeated. But after 20 years of asymetrical war and ambushes, the willpower to stay. But through all that time, america had absolute air supieriority.
    3
  138. For one simple reason. The nuclear arsenal. Without any use of nuclear warheads russia could stand a mounth against nato
    3
  139. We wait for 9 mounths now
    3
  140. At this point it should be clear that russia doesnt give a heck about civilians
    3
  141. Achieving air superiority is the number one goal in every war. Russia didnt managed this in 2 years
    3
  142. Iraq had one of the tightest air defence network on earth in 1990. But theougj texhnical supremicy they overwhelmed it
    3
  143. Well they dont. Because we dont want ww3 over ukraine. And ukraine makes a quiet good job
    3
  144. Yeah against rebels with some rifles and inocent civilians in ther cley homes
    3
  145. But for some reason they cant shot down a drone on a trail of 600 km
    3
  146.  @DrLsuBoyMatt  nope. Just the result of letting military hardware rot outside in harsh russian climate for decades. Do you know how much damage an average car takes after a single Winter outside...
    3
  147. Nobody claimed that they would run out of tanks in 2022. And they did indeed run out of missles. Thats why they stoped large attacks in early 2023. But they produced new ones
    3
  148. Nope just a military enthusiast
    3
  149. Well now about 1.800 if the rough number of destroid tanks are correct
    3
  150. There is a new one
    3
  151. Well nobody claimed that
    3
  152. What history. When they lost in tschetschnia and afgahnistan. Or when they needed hundreds of thousands of vehicles in aid from the west to defend against the nazis?
    3
  153. How is russia winning. Did they finally gained more then 1 percent of ukraine per year?
    3
  154. No they do not. They struggle against a smaller nation with 5 percent of Nato budget.
    3
  155. Stop falling for russian nazi propaganda
    3
  156. Still they didnt used it in combar
    3
  157. Did putin told you that numbers in Person 😂. So ukraine lost more than twice the amount they had pre war
    3
  158. Ukraine has 3 patriot Batteries. Russia attacked 7 cities. With over a hundred objects. Gues what happened
    3
  159. Thwn give us a link
    3
  160. Well the US would not have to fight a war this long. Amerika always relies on its air dominance and SEAD Programm. That is why they sweeped through iraq twice within weeks
    3
  161. Sure kid. And russia never did a propaganda trip with it like they did with kinzhal
    3
  162. Russia still is fighting ukraine and has to buy shells from north korea now. They are far from winning mate
    3
  163. And for some reason not a single propaganda report of russia
    3
  164. No accoutding to this video they lost about one third of their tanks
    3
  165.  @Alien_isolationist  you miss the bigger picture. Russia pulls its oldest reserves to feed the warmachine. They basicly burn 50 years of production for a single conflict. And russia has multiple enemys within and outside. Sooner or later their reserves will run out. And they have to keep equipment to secure other areas. Already they ask for North korea to help them out. Russia is a poor country. And they will come out a sehe looser one way or another.
    3
  166. Nope. They have 6000. Of those many lack parts or are Russen beyond repair
    3
  167. They cant even supply their troops now. How do you think they can supply millions of reservists😄
    3
  168. non of them are ww2 era. Yes they keep a couple for parades but they are not inkluded.
    3
  169. You mean the russian puppet. Not realy reliable
    3
  170. Nope oryx did not claim that. But indeed russia lost around 3000 tanks now
    3
  171. Ah in fact their production limit per year is about 250. And only older t90 junk
    3
  172. So russia is having a so called supirior tank and is in all out war with ukraine. Bit Sure safe this superwapon. Because there is no use for wapons if you are in war 😂
    3
  173. Because the t55 is a completly outdated tank with no spare parts and ammo in production. It increases complex supply lines and is basicly a desth sentence for the crews, whitch you have to train first.
    3
  174. You mean all the 20 prototypes?
    3
  175. The entire russian army is barly a million troops kid. Russia is progressive nowhere. And they didnt achieved one of their goals. Stop fanboying so hard
    3
  176. Both systems are neither in service nor in serial production. After almost two years of costly war, this idea of russia holding back something is silly
    3
  177. Nice Story bro. So where is the evidence
    3
  178. Not a single one ha. Kyiv, cherson kharkiv. But easy to forget those 😂
    3
  179. Sure kid. And now present your proof or shut up
    3
  180. In actuallity spacex is by far the cheapest, and they never lost a payload in launch. But its not about launch costs, its about operation a satalite System with expansive technology. Russia is poor
    3
  181. Nope they cannot. Most of this equipment is old and much beyond repair. They would need to overhall those vehicles and this takes time. Also equiping another million people and Support them with logitsics would overstrech russias logistics
    3
  182. Cope harder vatnik
    3
  183. You can count them
    3
  184. Since when is defending your country from invaders makes you a puppet
    3
  185. It absolutly did. Russia now asks north korea for shells and the firing rate decreased dramaticly
    3
  186. To All the russian fanboys here cry about russia still shelling ukraine. Yes they do and covert never claimed russia to run out any time soon. 😂
    3
  187. Source. Trust me bro 😂😂
    3
  188. Problem is in the beginning they used their newer tanks
    3
  189. To answer you confused comment. Yes they almost are out of missles. Now they fire a wave like every 6 weeks or even less. And when shot down we can see they were either sovjet era junk or produced in 2022. Soildiers. Kinda yes. That is why they mobilized 300.000 men and another 150.000 last mounth. Food. Kind of yeah. In the beginning of the war we saw countless of Videos of soildiers looting food stores. But that is more cause of bad logistics. Fuel. Also kinda yes. They ran out of fuel hundreds of times and abandod hundreds of vehicles cause again bad logistics
    3
  190.  @mEDIUMGap  the t55 is a totally different system than any newer tank. It doesnt even have an autoloader. So training on this is like teaching rifle man on muscets. Even russia itself claimed in 2013 only to have 13.000 tanks in totall so your tens of thousands is just a dumb silly cry out. In fact you know nothing. You just cheer on your day dreams of a long gone military Power that cant even take ukraine. Btw covert actually counted the stored tanks figuring out something between 4000 to 7000 totall. And now cry little russian baby
    3
  191. The conditions almost all the time are apocalyptic. I left my car outside for a year without driving it. It didnt even start and I had to repair like 5 things
    3
  192. I personaly think that whole belarus thing is simply a feint to worry ukraine about a incomming attack from the north. The goal propably is to weaken the eastern and southern fronts by transferring troops to the north.
    3
  193.  @SVOWarrior  wow. So why did the russians chatged head on into a city this weak with multiple tanks. Accourding to you this is not how its done theese days ;)
    3
  194.  @SVOWarrior  Abrams get anual Inspektionen and repairs. While we saw rusty russan tanks sitting sround not been moved for years. And again kid. Why using t55s of you easaly can bring more modern vehicles into the fight. They truth is you dont have enough left.
    3
  195.  @SVOWarrior  the sovjet empire is long gone. Theft and corruption replaced it. Russia accourding to you can produce enough. So why do they have to ask north korea for ammo. Why did they requested vehicles from belarus, why is the russian artillery rate falling every mounth. The answer is, they lie, they distract. They are a poor country trying to hold on to former glory
    3
  196. You know what your problem is. You dont know that col mc gregor is a shill. You believe what He says, without thinking twice. No matter what they say, this war is expansive. Russians die every day. And its embarressing. If they would have this Reserve you claim, then they would use it to end the war quickly. Also the west would know about it and report it.
    3
  197.  @LegaRoSS  you didnt Reader the Text, He clearly says in the middle, ukraine and russia belong together as a single nation. And btw. The anti russian if even existed, Resultat after the war was started by russia in 2014. Its russias fault of ukrainians dont like them
    3
  198.  @LegaRoSS  then its still a war. It wasa war the whole time. SMO is a propaganda Tool to confuse simple minded people.
    3
  199. Because putin wants all of ukraine. Now He knows He will never be able to tske it. So He at least want to controll all those areas He annaxed
    3
  200. Nope kid its russia vs ukrsine, with some aid from the west.
    3
  201. Patriot pac3
    3
  202. The question still stands. How many of those are actually able to be brought into service after setting around for 10 years outside. And how many are already looted for parts.
    3
  203. In the history of our species 😂😂😂. The russians actuall now have less tanks than the US. The freaking french in ww2 had more. The sovjets had almost 10 times more then current russia😂
    3
  204. And how many vehicles did china so far delivered?
    3
  205. Yes. And that is why russia now asks North korea for help
    3
  206. And indeed they did. Did you see any major missle attacks in the last mounths. Their stocpiles are dry and they rely on what they can produce.
    3
  207. The question is how many of destroyed and damaged actually can be recovered. Also many spare parts are not in production anymore so they have to loot older vehicles
    3
  208. And where are these secret storages? And how do you know about them
    3
  209. It was
    3
  210.  @aniksamiurrahman6365  I do. But correct misinformstion also is nice. Dont you think
    3
  211. How do you think winning looks like.
    3
  212.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  sure thing mate. Instead of keep the money inside the country they spend it overseas in countries which will dumb russias Reputation. Just admit russia hasng enough shells anymore. They had more than anybody else in the beginning. But now the stocks are dry and they cant keep up
    3
  213.  @Stigger1977  for some unfortunate wagner troops who were send to die in the meatgrinder with very little ammonition to serve as human shields yes. That is where the Story is from
    3
  214.  @jackkelly335  yep. We dont wish. We see
    3
  215. You didnt even watched the video so Sh. Up
    3
  216. ​ @usun_politics1033 that is literly the only thing He did. So stop calling it propaganda kid
    3
  217. 20 years. 😂😂😂 Wtf kid.
    3
  218. Is that so. So why dozens of defence melitias formed in donbass if all of donbass wanted independence
    3
  219. So if its done russia should have easy work right
    3
  220. Russia has lost so mich equipment that they have to pull out 70 year old gesr out of storage and ask north korea for ammo. Russia is basicly in a 1941 state.
    3
  221. Fighting on the frontline right now. Scraping thousands of russian vehicles. But ask the russians why after bakhmut they only lost territory
    3
  222. Also their military fails
    3
  223.  @anthonynicholich9654  And nowdays they struggle to make even 1 per day. nice. former glory and strenght is no indicator for present capabilities. its not like there is some special russian gene...
    3
  224. Nope. The do in fact running low. That is why they bring in t55s in. And if they wanted to mpdernize and Script their military. Why do they need a war for that. Couldnt they have done it without it
    3
  225. Right now they dont build any t14.
    3
  226. ​ @Alienisolati0nist again where sre those numbers comming from. Even russia claims to have less than 12.000 tanks pre war.
    3
  227. ​ @yap5995 can you prove any of those claims?
    3
  228. Nope 2000 tanks accourding to oryx. A open source intellegence website. And the Ghostwriter of kiew was created by the internet😂. Not the government
    3
  229. Yep confirmed by footage. And they match with the ones pulled out of storage
    3
  230. Well you dont need to. You can count.
    3
  231.  @jeffbenton6183  cause some ranks are just beyond repair and need to be scrapped. At least you can get some spare parts
    3
  232. Funny in recent footage they have still t72 and t64s so they are Not out
    3
  233. ​ @nothere4089 and beeing pretty Sure, means you know nothing. Great argument
    3
  234.  @neowuwei7851  btw. Russia doesnt have as many ballistic missles anymore. Otherwise they would use them
    3
  235.  @neowuwei7851  if its so easy for russia, they should have achieved air superiority in ukraine a long time ago. And russia doesnt have hypersonic missles. They have balistic missles which have been shot down evidently at least twice.
    3
  236.  @neowuwei7851  Scott Ritter is a pro russian shill, who predicted the russian breakthrough for 2 years now. Mocking western propaganda, while falling for russian propaganda is stunning. In actuallity. Most of Initial fighting would mean SEAD missions and air war. Something russia proved to be very bad at
    3
  237.  @neowuwei7851  USA, UK, france and to a certain extent germny. But combat experience is relative. In modern air war, you dont fight dogfights like in TOP GUN. What matters, is stealth, Radar Systems and intellegence. All of them are superior in western ircrsft. Amerika build almost a 1000 stealth 5 gen fighters, while russia did not even made dozen.
    3
  238. Nice fantasy. In actuallity, Nato would achieve air superiority within weeks and penetrant frontlines with aircraft, clearing the psth for armored forces. Russia barly can cope ukraine and the trolls still thinknthey can wistand Nato
    3
  239. Nope. Nobody said they would run out of tanks any time soon in 2022. You are a liar
    3
  240. Why wouldnt you
    3
  241. Well they did. That is why we didnt see any major missle attacks in half a year. That is why they buy drones from iran.
    3
  242. Well they did run low on shells. That is why they ask north korea for help
    3
  243. No the offensive failed cause the russians spend mounths of laying millions of mines in a certain area
    3
  244. You using russian numbers how is that better?
    3
  245. Why. They provide evidence for each vehicle.
    3
  246. Well they didnt uaed any missle waves in half a year and ask north korea for help
    3
  247. Nope they wont. You cant recover a exploded or burned tank.
    3
  248. Nope He didnt say such thing. But nice try
    3
  249. Yes it is. Russia denies ukrainians right to exist and what is happening when occupiers are feel like it you saw in the thousands of Videos of looting and murdering of civilians
    2
  250. BullHit number from a bullshiting troll. Besides, russia used its airforce from day one.
    2
  251. Are you literly coping from telegram kid. Not even the north koreans clsim the possession of such a number of subs in Total. What is wrong with you
    2
  252.  @MrPaxio  kid this includes everything. Csre of refugees, rebuilding, buy New equipment and so on. Do you know how expansive war is
    2
  253.  @MrPaxio  read my comment if you didnt get the other stuff except feeding
    2
  254. Pure cringe here
    2
  255. Oh so the russians finaly took adjivka after loosing 300+ vehicles in two weeks
    2
  256. Russia could end all the sanctions by just leave ukraine alone
    2
  257. Sure kid. Its so nice to live under a cruel dictator
    2
  258. Russia and North korea both admit the shipping. And you have no evidence what so ever for this 5 million claim. So dont try
    2
  259. Well south korea is not broke, and the homless rate is about average to the western world
    2
  260. Kiew in three days
    2
  261. There is but not realy effective ines
    2
  262.  @gumelini1  the entire north of ukrsine and parts of Kyiw.
    2
  263. Yeah you know that they losing ground right now everywhere. And russia used to have double that landmass. What happened to that.
    2
  264.  @krislalone4160  If they talk about russia having more tanks at their desposal than in the beginning, they mean on the battlefield. And this while propably true, only means they pulled massive amounts of stuff out of storage. Bringen ist to the battlefield. But this numbers show that they run low on equipment in storage. Also meaning ukrainians are able to destroy massive amounts of vwhicles
    2
  265. What terror attacks?
    2
  266. Given that they dont have enough ammo anymore would make this nunsense
    2
  267. The very fact that this war isnt over already and russia isbloaing huge amounts if personal and equipment
    2
  268. Ahm did I missed a hige success of the russians, or what is that supposed to mean
    2
  269. And still they didnt destroy a single himars
    2
  270.  @valefur72  to be fair. The kurds are Well trained in ambush and anti tank waponry. The russians are not
    2
  271. The Attack in the saudi oilfield proof you wrong
    2
  272.  @definitelyfrank9341  nope that is not established. You just believe it. But ok. 17. Meaning 2 a mounth. Compared to two or three russian tanks a day. Who is doing good and who is doing bad
    2
  273. And what are those
    2
  274. Yeah but soon the public Was aware of it
    2
  275. Ah is that. And what could that be. A wapon they never testet. A wapon they dont use for intimidation. In reality they mostly reasearch in hypersonic wapons and technical warfare. They dont need another doomsday wapon. They already have one. But the new battlefield is the internet now
    2
  276. Well typical russian tactic. Overwhelm the enemy with sheer numbers
    2
  277. The americans did barly commit any ground operations in golf war 1. Almost everything was done by the airforce
    2
  278. Well because it is nonsense. Everyone will know who usedit
    2
  279. We arent
    2
  280. Starting a costly war for no reasonable goal is not smart
    2
  281. Nope most their airdefence is the s300
    2
  282. That is only partially true. The 3500 km is the totall reach you can fly under optimal conditions. But in combat you need to fly to the target 1/3, come back 1/3 and spare fuel for possible AA attacks 1/3. In totall around 1100km combat radius. Also only in ideal conditions. Flying low on sealevel, meaning thicker atmosphere the range deacreses. Meaning the 600 km is very accurate.
    2
  283. ​ @sandeepkulkarni8163 russia used literly every wapon sthey have. All balistic and hypersonic missles, t14 tanks and even su57. All division are more or less present in ukraine. And its not enough
    2
  284. Stringer than ever before. They pulling out 70 year old equipment and ask north korea for help. Wow what a strong nation 😂
    2
  285. Look up the definition of War instead of swallow the russian propaganda. Still ukrain airspace is protected by a good anti air system. Why didnt the airforce helped during the last days, why so they have to fly low. Because they barly can fight in ukraine.
    2
  286. And sacraficing its ground troops in the process
    2
  287. Your entire existance is
    2
  288. Because their would want to use their airforce as bombers. Ukraine has a small one but still is flying.
    2
  289. They did. They basicly used everything they have except the su57.
    2
  290. Always funny how people claim the F35 to be obsolet, while russias S57 is worse in RCS
    2
  291. Good that you mention syria. Who bombed and completly destroyed over 10 cities in the north again, along with thousands of civilians. Yes russia
    2
  292. Yet. Attacks are rare, the ukrainian airdefence is still operating and russia cant bomb cities freely
    2
  293. Brics consists of 5 states and right now no countries Apple for membership
    2
  294. Like in Butcha. Or are dams military targets
    2
  295. Not realy they did not reciefed any long range airdefences.just their own s300
    2
  296. It did. Still ukraines airdefence is active. No air supieriority is achieved.
    2
  297. Oh did they found those 1.5 Mio. Winter uniforms yet
    2
  298. They using litterly all ground combat troops they have. The only reason they calling it a special military Operation is because it sounds better than war
    2
  299. Do you know the rate they are doing it? No.
    2
  300. Nope. Just counting artillery pieces with satalite pictures...
    2
  301.  @rootin222  indeed and so did thousands of russian tanks. By ATGMs 40 years old. ATGMs are, Well, Anti tank guided missles. What do you think they are suposed to do.
    2
  302. We saw this marvel EW Systems on tanks. Gues what, they got destroyed anyway
    2
  303.  @Glorytorussia2025  why are you so obvios about beeing a kremlin troll
    2
  304. Well they did ran out of ammo though. That is why they buy from iran and north korea.
    2
  305.  @MA-hn9vo  everybody except the rusdian president wants peace. But what I dont want is a dictstorship taking over a country by force, brutalizing the population and showing every dictator, that they can take what they want by force as well
    2
  306.  @MA-hn9vo  no. Are you?
    2
  307. Nope He never said anything lile that. He actually counted what is left..
    2
  308. Funny that the west apperently is warmongering while russia started the war and refuses to make acruall negotiations
    2
  309. Wow 3400 armata. They themaelf said they maid around 100 or less of those 😅
    2
  310. You can make assumptions
    2
  311. Not if you have satalite pictures
    2
  312. Military is the inly topic of this channel and He did this for years.
    2
  313. Nope 10.000. Bur aperently they have much less
    2
  314. Provide any evidence they did. Russian military Bloggers confirmed the loss of at least 3 aircraft
    2
  315. First. No the f35 Was not shot down. Second. Yes out of over 800 produced f 35s half a dozen have malfunctions. Russia cannot even produce a dozen of a far inferior plane.
    2
  316.  @fryertuck6496  Sorry I always forget that average people dont know much about warfare. To answer your question. Its Called SEAD warfare. Supression of enemy airdefence. Most the time you dont know where AA Systems are, cause they are hidden. Even with satalite they are hard to detect. Modern militaries use apecialised SEAD planes to detect and destroy AA systems. Amerika did this very succesfull in iraq and achieved airsupiriority within days. Something russia hasnt achieved in 2 years. Inform yourself before you make a fool out of yourself
    2
  317. Sure kid. So why cant they fly freely over ukraine
    2
  318. There is no such thing as SU-72
    2
  319. ​ @Mitch1371Tube russia lost in finland, russia lost in tchetchnia, russia lost in sfgahnistam, russia lost against Japan, russia lost against poland. Russia looses all the time except when the west is giving support
    2
  320. Actually now there are 4. And one damaged. Mesning there is one piece of it damaged, which can ne replaiced
    2
  321. Sure kid. Half a million soildiers on the frontline already hundreds of thousands dead. Not a war kiddo, right
    2
  322. Sure kid. So you stay ukraine lost more aorcraft that they actually possessed. So that is where this russian swlf inflicted hipe is comming from
    2
  323. Yeah they desteoyed all 84 of the 16 delivered Systems like a year ago
    2
  324. Missle strike is not airforce. Its missles. And the US doesnt want to get involced in the war. They dont fly anything there
    2
  325. Whenever russia uses a new waponsystem they launch a huge propaganda campain. If they would have used it, they would say it
    2
  326. Nato never lost against afgahni cave men. As long as there was NATO presence the tsliban where unable to win
    2
  327. They dont have air supiriority. And you would know this of you would Google what this actually means
    2
  328. Funny. So when the russian government and russian military Bloggers confirm the loss of multiple aircraft, its also propaganda?
    2
  329. What did he get wrong
    2
  330. Is russia?
    2
  331. Yeah we all excpected ukraine to lose
    2
  332. Yet russia lost like half the occupied area
    2
  333. One thing that turned out a bit differently is the missle arsenal. Altgough stockpiles seem to shrink, they had much more than most people expacted
    2
  334. Take ukrainian sources with a big grain of salt
    2
  335. Multipöy by 1.5 and you get close to reality. Most tanks are not pjotographet
    2
  336. What is wrong with biolabs. I have 4 of them in my home City. And the maidan recolution was started by pissed young ukrsinians.
    2
  337.  @azmagaref  and one Thing more, if the russian losses are that low why are they begging Belarus for tanks
    2
  338.  @azmagaref  first. Nobody is seriosly taking the ukrainian numbers, they are of course exagurated. But yours is laughable smalltalk, and given that you dont have any evodence shows a lot. And yes they have. They use posts of different Media, satalite imiges geolocation and some other methods. They Provide the pictures on their Website. You just dont believe it, because you dont like it. But if you think you have more acurate Information, Fell free to enlight US.
    2
  339. And 100k russian troops, about 50 planes, and incredible numbers of other vihicles
    2
  340. He made a video
    2
  341. Nope
    2
  342. Yet they barly do anything
    2
  343. That is not what they do anymore. They cannot srop ukraines trade, they cannot fire missles at ukraine anymore. They basicly Traped in Port
    2
  344. ​ @TJ-wo1xt russia didnt realy advanced for a year now. The only time they made significant progress is when they let wagner troops charge in certain death. Russia is far from whinning
    2
  345. You still think russia fights Nato 😂😂
    2
  346. By ukrainian regime you mean the elected ukrainian government. Stop crinking so much russian coolaid.
    2
  347. The t14 is not yet to be produced. The company designing them isnt even existing anymore
    2
  348. So the pronounciation of english speaking people to a german word is relevant. Why?
    2
  349. Jesterday ukraine hit a trainingside with over 300 russians. Seems to work
    2
  350.  @tonyp2865  no I havent. Because you just made this dumb shit up. So you got any serios arguments or are you keep talking bs like that
    2
  351. Aperently not
    2
  352. They worked quiet Well against russia. But they are a second World country, so you are half right
    2
  353. Yeah in russia there is no free Media anymore
    2
  354. Missles and launcher are two seperate things.
    2
  355. Yeah like in ww2. The west just should never support russia and UK in their fight against fascism. The world would be a great place
    2
  356. Did you counted them yourself 😂
    2
  357. Yeah and they lost around 2000 others already. Propably more. The thing is the leopard facing the strongest defence line so fsr in this war. The russian tanks mostly improvised defences
    2
  358. Nope we cant. Cause Lasers are pretty shit through thick atmosphere. But they have missles for that
    2
  359. Nope they are struggleing against a wave of sovjet scrap that keeps coming until they run out of ammonition
    2
  360. He claimes that in the end russia will win kid. Whatch the entire video. Also right now still russia is suffering
    2
  361. nope the russians are diyng like flyes and even moved back in the north. right now the ukrainias are winning.
    2
  362. Yeah they would If the crap about biowapons would be true
    2
  363. Actually we are now more to 1.800
    2
  364. ​ @KolyaUrtz russia lost two entire fleets in the japanese russian war. They lost a harbor and basicly 2/3 of their maritime vessels
    2
  365. How much.
    2
  366. And lost around half a million in the process. Along with its entire active tank fleet
    2
  367. ​​ @rflats771 you didnt watched the video. He did not claim russia has run out of anythin....g
    2
  368. Is there anpther artillery video comming?
    2
  369. Nope nobody said that recently. But apperently they run low
    2
  370. Did they. And how many are they producing per year
    2
  371. You didnt watched the video did you?
    2
  372. Yes indeed the ukrainians stoped the progress of the russian nazis. Russia is loosing ground
    2
  373. Wrong Video kid
    2
  374. He didnt said russia will completly run out by now. And yes by many Standards NK is a second World country. Health System, agriculture and others are severly underdeveloped
    2
  375. Well nobody claimed that😂
    2
  376. My D... is infinite as well
    2
  377. And?
    2
  378.  @BobWill1846  and now they buy shells from North korea
    2
  379. Why is it that you all seem to not have watched the actuall video
    2
  380. Sure kid. Like russia cant even take ukraine but is supposed to tske any Nato country😂
    2
  381. Why is that. He did not claimed russia would run out at this point
    2
  382. Nope they did not say this. They said russia jas supply issues and is short in cruise missles. Which seems to be true. And ukraine in fact had multiple successes
    2
  383. Is that so. Then what is your evidence
    2
  384. They using them now as suicode vehicles packed with explosives
    2
  385. Wow. So the upsetpropagandists and constant threats are just for Show I gues
    2
  386. So insead of using their actuall artillery in storage they use inaccurate fuel Hunger old stuff
    2
  387. ​ @MoseleyJon  so if they are so powerfull why cant they just finish the Job ❤
    2
  388. Nope. Nobody claimed that about tanks. And yes they are low on missles. They barly fire any in mounths and when they do they fire ones produced in 2022
    2
  389. Well bit this scheute are totally faked and overestimated. So they are still running out
    2
  390. Yes you do. So why are you posting
    2
  391. You know that russia has the economy equipment of italy😂
    2
  392. Just another russian fanboy. I see. So why are the so bad in combat. According to you russia should have won by now
    2
  393. His videos are based on visible evidence you can look up yourself. So what are you tslking about 😂
    2
  394. Oh is that. So how many, and where is the evdince
    2
  395. Yeah but if you cant properly repair them, have to produce ammo from decades ago and train people on them, to get inaccurate weak artillery is not a big game changer
    2
  396. Well the problem is they might dont. If they fail mid combat they do more harmlos thsn good.
    2
  397. Who belives russians
    2
  398. Well but still, you need to get them started and running. You need at least two guys to drive them. Also even russian orcs wouöd recognise their role as cannon fodder
    2
  399. So the t55s are for fun ha
    2
  400. Little hint kid. Every modern tanks has abc protection. Including t72, t80 and t90. If you still want to piss your parts because of nothing that is on you
    2
  401. So if they have all this stuff. Why not just march in and finish the Job. Russia indead suffered huge losses, and a reasonable leader would have stopped the war long ago but putin is a failing dictstor Holding on to Power. A retreat would mean his end
    2
  402. As soon as they run out of spareparts, which is soon because they are out of production AMD Wracks are increasingly abandond
    2
  403. Well they would have used their airforce way more intense and precice. The russians dont realy care about SEAD missions. Nato does. Also most the europeen equipment is much more modern
    2
  404. At a alarming rate? It is hard to quantify the ukrsinian losses even for Western investigstors so why you think you can. The problem is that the russian equipment is getting ripped apart as same as the ukrainian is. The biggest difference is while russian wapons are getting more and more primitive the Western supply are more and more sufisticated. And never underestimate the importance of moral and training. Russia now pulls conscripts and reservists into the frontlines. Low moral, poor training and even worse equipment. They facing a higly motivated, Well equiped army and dont even know what they are fighring for
    2
  405. Yes they vover them up better. Cause they use ethnic minorities and now even cuban slave troops to remain their army
    2
  406.  @SVOWarrior  and in their mad dog attack they lost hundreds of vehicles, thousands of troops and didnt advanced a single Meter. Incredible losses for nothing. What is the plan, down the ukrainian troops in russian blood. We saw this before, in ww2 but this time Amerika is not Helsingborg russia out with aid
    2
  407.  @SVOWarrior  also why rsnting sbout storage. 80% of russian tanks where in storage. But they kept them outside for decades, in sibiria in rain and snow. Gues what it does to a machine
    2
  408. Well they are not able to do that. Simple. For almost the entire war they only used stockpiles of the sovjet union wich they had plenty of. Now the stockpiles are exhausetd and they ask north korea and Iran for help. We sent ukraine around 5% of our budget in equipment. We could send them 1000 tanks tomorrow if we wanted
    2
  409.  @LegaRoSS  He said it in his essay: about the union of ukraine and russia. Its free in thr internet There He Talks about how He doesnt see ukraine as a country and more like a province of russia. research before cry
    2
  410. No, they wanted to annax ukraine from the beginning, putin always claimed ukraine to be the peoperty of russis
    2
  411. So how many Nato troops are there in Ukraine. How many airstrikes and missles did Nato launched against russia
    2
  412. How excactly
    2
  413. How so. Since it was published russia didnt even managed to tske territory of the size of now yourk City.
    2
  414. Because they are Not trustworthy anymore
    2
  415. Yes the sheer will of Will of ukrainian people to resist the invasion. Lets speed up the support so ukraine can tske back the Rest of their lands
    2
  416. Another Hobby strategist claiming stuff
    2
  417. The SU-57? You mean the thing they have less then a dozen off. The thing wuth the RCS of a f18 accourding to the russians.😂 good luck with that
    2
  418. They did in spring 2023. Thsts why they stoped firing. Now they had almost a year to produce new one
    2
  419. Yeah. Cause insurgency is not the same as a conventional war
    2
  420. This needs some more specific context. For example which type of equipment. The tank and IFV numbers are propably quiet accurate, cause drones always Film the battlefields. However artillery pieces are definitive undercounted. Cause they get destroyed far behind the front, where only few drones manage to spot them
    2
  421. Yeah we heard that a thousand times. So why dont you present actuall evidence for those bunkers mate 😉 And in the process present any evidence for that 500k claim. So far none of the vatniks could
    2
  422. Well in this video its said they have around 8000 left. If you see how they are stored you can asume at least half of them require excesive repairs. The question is not how many they have but how many can they bring into battle. And more importsnt how many can they support in terms of logistics.
    2
  423.  @Romoro86  yes the sovjets made a huge arsenal. But most of it is gone now. Much in former Client states. Even more Sold to other countries. And many vehicles scraped. What is left over you see now. Yes both will never run out. But the question is how much is russia willing to lose until they start to negotiate
    2
  424. That is what He showed
    2
  425.  @richardvaldes3959  250.000 in all of sovjet union. Meaning more than half where in suppresed Client states. More where Sold off
    2
  426. Yes. Dry weather is much better for metall
    2
  427. Not realy. They almost only use artillery now.
    2
  428.  @mbtenjoyer9487  not quiet. Iraq had a disdunctional army and government. A corrupt and criminal masterpiece but inneffectice in the end. Also america is much more advanced in military tech then russia was
    2
  429. This clip is about kiew kid
    2
  430. Nobody said that
    2
  431. This is a bullshit number. Russia doesnt possess this many artillery pieces
    2
  432. Nope little cope troll. Counting
    2
  433.  @mv69969  so counting is nonsene now?
    2
  434.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  nope durring 2022 they where stuned how much shells russia Hase. But now eventually they are correct. Russia needs to buy from iran and North korea
    2
  435.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  nope. Literly nobody said anything about russia running out of artillery pieces a year ago. If we said something like this we talked about artillery shells. And this is the case russia can only fire what they produce or buy from north korea
    2
  436. Nope not yet. But in around one year. At least in storage
    2
  437.  @Stigger1977  Well given that those are expandable ill equiped goons, makes it very likely
    2
  438.  @IIIIlllll000OOO  there was a single situation when wagner gobblins stormed ukrainian positions near bakhmut. They where very illegal equiped and in the end had to use what ever they had ro fight. Including shovels, when out of ammo.
    2
  439.  @Stigger1977  you mean the internet urban legend. So the creation of some europeen trolls told you. You must be a very simple minded person
    2
  440.  @Stigger1977  so you dont know it. Well kid, you sjould check
    2
  441. ​ @jackkelly335 yep
    2
  442. What are ukronazis? Like who specificly.
    2
  443. You clearly dont know how to use those numbers, right?
    2
  444. Well your numbers are completly off
    2
  445. BecUse of a different military doctrine. West doesnt rely as much of artillery as russia does.
    2
  446.  @truthseekerodinson5094  not realy no. Russia inheritad most of that stuff from the sovjet union. Most of it is very old, and gues how much of it is actually working after decades outside in the rain. But keep in mind. Ivan with with all that power they cant break ukraine
    2
  447.  @kenjifox4264  no. But not closly enough to compensatethe imense losses of the russian army
    2
  448.  @kenjifox4264  this is a pure asumption and is debunked by the fact that they pull half century old stuff out of storage. Remember that russia is a very poor country
    2
  449. Counting things is not propaganda kid
    2
  450. Sure kid. You got any evidence beyond, beliefw me bro
    2
  451. So you cheer on a country whichs military is 80% from a long gone empire and which is using that to invade another country 😂
    2
  452. All he did was counting cannon on satalite images
    2
  453. Nothing in north korea is Brand new
    2
  454.  @danielmlinar4892  yes you are copium. Nice to admit that pal.
    2
  455. Are they? The only reason it progresses so slow are insane mine fields. Not the great russian army that is holding them back. Russia abandoned its goals and only hopes to hold as much territory as possible
    2
  456. Nobody said that and you little fool didnt even watched the video
    2
  457. If it wouldnt be a threat He would not constantly complain about it
    2
  458. Nope on picture
    2
  459. Tanks, Well they send t55s now. Shells unlikly. Missles yes where are the greT missle waves from the beginning
    2
  460. You dont even watched the video little troll
    2
  461. Excellent work as always. Could you do another tsnk video please???
    2
  462. Funny. Ukrainians enjoyed much more freedome thsn most bricht states. Yet they call them nazis😂
    2
  463. Wow only 35k dead. Did you guesed that yourself or did the kremlin told you so personaly
    2
  464. All Nato? So Nato s3nded all its 6000 tanks 3000 fighter jets and 3.2 million man? Also thousands of missles and ships. Wow they must realy stealthy because I dont see them
    2
  465. ​ @ryanlieb3958 russia could have ended the war on day one, by not invading and Not funding terrorists in the east. But russia itself was in poor condition and they hoped that many in ukraine just would switch sides. But thst never happened
    2
  466. What a stupid comment
    2
  467.  @dingodog5677  and that is where I have to burst your bubble. Of this 15.000 deads almost half, around 6000 where ukrainian soildiers. Another 5000 where armed seperatists. And only 3000 where civilians. On both sides btw. Those numbers before the war, where confirmed by the rebbels, ukraine and the UN, so call me a liar, but also call the seperatists liars. So if you claim 15.000 civilians, you already fell for a lie, created in this war to shift support from ukraine.
    2
  468. ​ @dingodog5677 as every half informed people you take the 15.000 number and dont know what it means. For example, do you know how many of these 15.000 where armed soildiers ?
    2
  469. Genozide. You mean the 3000 civilians died in the Chaos. Number russis achieved in mariopol alone. Accourding to you russia commits genozide in donbass right now
    2
  470. Sure thing mate. So why are all the soildiers speak russian and ukrainian. Does Nato has hundreds of thousands ukrainian speaking troops 😂.
    2
  471. Nope they did not had himars back then
    2
  472. No he did not tell putin that. 😂
    2
  473. Well they got their Arms from russia, they got money from russia. Russia send special forces on day one. So xes they are russian backed
    2
  474. Sure that is why russian troops seized key locarions and a Party which wasnt even in crimean parliament orginized the so called vote
    2
  475. Kid the russian armed the melitias in 2014. They started the war.
    2
  476. It aged perfectly. Russia now has to buy shells from north korea and uses garden sheds on tracks to cross battlefields
    2
  477.  @vicdor1031  Video footage. NGOs using open intellegence and the fact, that theydraft more and more equipment from storage, seen by satalite. Its all open for you.
    2
  478. Russia still looses insane amounts of equipment.
    2
  479.  @danielmlinar4892  Mal abgesehen davon das der gute Boris das nicht gesagt hat und auch gsrnicht wissen kann, eine Frage. Die Russen müssen Munition aus Nordkorea kaufen. Warum wenn sie doch genug selber machen können. Warum müssen sie hunderte Panzer aus dem Lager holen wenn sie moderne Sachen einfacher hätten. Warum gewinnen Sie nicht, sonder rennen Woche für Woche gegen die Ukrainer an wobei sie hohe Verluste haben
    2
  480. German here. Nope, He did not said that
    2
  481.  @bomjahed  still nope kid. Life action maps are very interresting. Also if all is gone whst hinders the russians of attacking again 😘
    2
  482. By bully ukraine. Aha
    2
  483. So how where two vessels destroyed in sevastopol 😅
    2
  484. Except they are the first ones ever produced stealth planes and still are basicly the only ones who have them in mass
    2
  485. Stupid argument. Back than you easaly could conscript everybody and switch to mass producing everything from tanks to planes. This is not possible today anymore. Also USSR was heavily suported by the west
    2
  486. So why is north korea constantly Posting of USA
    2
  487. Not easy no, but as seen in two Golf wars it is doable as long as you have a competent military
    2
  488. Yeah russia, which is sttuggling against ukraine is totally prepaired to take on wjole of Nato.
    2
  489. Well those losses are proven by picture. So no
    2
  490. And lost 20.000 of them in end 1941.
    2
  491. ​ @Zeldi4ka  secrets are secret until you reveal them. We jnow incredible Details about very delecate sovjet secrets, we know about secret bases they had all over the world, we know details about atimic bombs, KGB missions and Lots of others. And now you want to tell me, we dont know about giant tank vaults all over the countries, some in nowdays Nato countries. No kid I am sorry. This secret would be revealed by now. Especially about the vaults in new Nato countries. And because you have no proof what so ever, except, some guy told me, you are Not believable. Did you ever realized, this guy, if He exists, just Lied to you to have a good story.
    2
  492.  @Zeldi4ka  having shelters for ammo and aircraft yes. But Show me ine picture, one Pieve of evidence of tsnks beeing stored like that
    2
  493. Aha. And you have proof for that I gues
    2
  494. Aha. Did you have seen this yourself. Did you tried it.
    2
  495. Why is it bullshit. This is basicly how intellegence agencies do it
    2
  496. aperantly not
    2
  497. No
    2
  498. Well both are easy to produce for russia
    2
  499. About 600
    2
  500. No just counting
    2
  501. ​ @nothere4089 also keep in mind many of those tanks in storage, are rusty or looted for parts. Meaning many good looking ranks not gonnoa work either
    2
  502. Oryx. A open source intellegence website
    2
  503. Oh no. Two guys doing a nazi salute. I recently saw three guys doing the same thing in Frsnkfurt. That means all of germany is 150 percent nazi ha😂
    2
  504. Source. The Clown in kremlin😂
    2
  505. ​ @nik6759 oh and there are no underground storages. You have no proof what so ever and neither do your collueges. You just gues they are their without proofing anything
    2
  506. ​ @nik6759 by picture. Oryx and other open source websites did Sure not perfect but close enough to get an idea
    2
  507. Not all of it no. But He counted possible tanks in garages as well
    2
  508. Ww2 mentality. Everything that technicly can be used one day ist kept in storage
    2
  509. Ahm no most of them are sovjet era tanks
    2
  510. Sure kid. If pootin says so
    2
  511. Wow. Those drugs must be great. What did you took
    2
  512. Oh another guy who things azow is all of ukraine. Kids are so easy to fool by russia 😂
    2
  513. That is not how military projects work
    2
  514. The Moskwa sank Kid 😘
    2
  515.  @tomk3732  who is tslking sbout pakistan kid. Try to keep up. Lucky me I was bourne in neither those countries. And I am glad for that.
    2
  516. Nobody knows to be honest. But it appears that the wave of modern russian tanks on the battlefield has not happen yet.
    2
  517. Because that is a lie you made up.
    2
  518. Sure you got any evidence for that stupid numbers right.
    2
  519. ​ @texx1985 ukraine so far withstands immense russian attacks and even managed to progress at the dnipre. Ukraine has everything to win and everything to loose.
    2
  520. Watch the video kid
    2
  521.  @MrMatmulan  If russia has plenty of shells in their stockpiles. Why should they make the embarrissing and allianating move to buy shells from north korea. NK is not a normal country. Also it shows to the world that mighty russia cant produce enough to satisfey their needs. russia could keep its money home and give it to domestic commpanies instead of NK
    2
  522. It took the russian two years to crack adjivka. That is not what I would call a stunning victory
    2
  523. Their economy faces the largest workers shortage in decades and the only thing that upholds their GdP is waüons production. So stuff they cant use for anything else than get blown up.
    2
  524. No. Just counting
    2
  525. Well the Media underestimated russia. That is true. But they would not ask iran and north korea for help if they where fine
    2
  526. And indeed they did run out of missles. Now they try to produce some New ones for the winter
    2
  527. Well do you see russia winning. The defender doesnt have to win. They just dont hsve to loose
    2
  528. Well He said how long at the current rate it would take for ukraine to destroy all russian tanks. Pay attention
    2
  529. ​ @MA-hn9vo I answered you. Dont bother others
    2
  530. Confirmed by picture they did
    2
  531.  @fred6319  maybe you used slur oder just spreaded misinformation Kid. The revolution in kiew was 2014. Selensky founded his party in 2018 and was elected in 2019.
    2
  532.  @fred6319  you mean the elected government that is defending itself. How is that a regime.
    2
  533. What is the kiev regime?
    2
  534. The russians and north koreans themself announced the transfer of shells kid.
    1
  535. So far they turned out much more reliable thsn others. Yes
    1
  536. Is it though? Russia in the last mounths said they where never against peace talks
    1
  537.  @Tugela60  propably je will talk some crap about faints
    1
  538. Sure. That is why putin for a decade claimed ukraine to be a rightfull part of russia
    1
  539. So people from the west celebrate fascist dystopian dictstoeships now. You truly are the last generation
    1
  540. Sure. So this is why they willingly allienate themself from half the world by making Deals with north korea
    1
  541. Sure kid
    1
  542. Kid. Both of them admit the transfer. Stop mocking yourself
    1
  543. Lets destroy this lies Pieve by piece. 1. Japan was almost beaten to defeat by the US and in the and also USSR through 3 years of War. 2. They recieved thousands of armored vehicles and planes from the USSR. Otherwise they would have been basicly a infantry army. 3. North korea lost 90 percent of their territory, when China intervened with half a million troops. This attack drove the UN forces back. Not the north koreans. 4. They fought mainly against a expedition force 90 percent americans around 200.000 troops in totall. 5. NK bought data, knowledge and even parts from pakistan for their nukes. They also buy Chips and other critical parts from the black market. Nort korea is a poor, dystopian and economical inferior country that trans millions of people under a cruel dictstorship. Stop gloryfey them with your stupidity
    1
  544.  @hhkk6155  obviosly another one who doesnt understand anything. Noce
    1
  545. Jeah they get like 5% of Nato budget and still hold their ground imagine wahat 10 % would do
    1
  546.  @MrPaxio  I give up man. If youbare unable to read, you are not intellegent enough to understand how war works
    1
  547. By them you mean the rulling dictator
    1
  548. Actually you do see it in countless Videos. Ehat is the name of this scientist
    1
  549. Israel doesnt care
    1
  550. Take this into context. They mobilised low quality troops. And got out everything out of storage as possible. Now they have a huge army and Not the logistics or sparparts to support it
    1
  551.  @daledykes9253  nope. Footage evidwnce feom open source organisations like oryx
    1
  552. In actuallity only 1 /3 of the 30 tanks got destroyed or captured. But in the same time russia lost around 500
    1
  553. Nobody said that
    1
  554. Because doctrine. Nato Reliefs more on aircraft thsn AA systems
    1
  555. One system got destroyed by atacams
    1
  556. Iron dome has an effective range of only 7 km. Most times less. They might be in fact be very effective against slow drones and high altetude missles, but against low flying cruese missles the effectivness is debatable
    1
  557. It worked pretty good. But the best System in the world is overwelmed when hundreds of drones and missles are incoming at the same time
    1
  558. But they cant shot down a drone flying over 600 km in russian airspace
    1
  559.  @goshawk4340  ah. So when they whiped out the iraqi army twice, with over 6000 tanks and half a million man, that was not a real war right.
    1
  560. You think a war is decided by a few hundred missles, you are a fool
    1
  561. Thes comment aged like milk
    1
  562.  @dominuslogik484  indeed
    1
  563. yeah Putin has to mobilize, But everything goes accourding to plan. Ukraine captured more territory than russia did in 4 mounth. But this was propably accourding to plan as well
    1
  564. According to who. The russians. Kid you should have learned by now that the numbers they claim are as true aa putins election resaults
    1
  565. So does russia
    1
  566. Any Figures how much they produce
    1
  567. 7 mounth old troll account. Given that none has reliable numbers, on actuall russian production makes your comment pointless. And it doesnt change anything about disapearence of russian equipment from stockpiles
    1
  568. Sure thing mate. The old russia could if they want. But dont do it cause they are such hreat people. We are tired of it.
    1
  569.  @captaindak5119  accourding to vatniks vul3dar is in danger for a year now. Even if it is. Russia payed a way to high price for it
    1
  570. Nope little troll. Ukraine did not say that....
    1
  571. ​ @-Zardoz- what are ukron@zis
    1
  572. @dedster3164  guys like you are stuck in the, but you said ukraine was winning myth. Nobody says that. Yes russia advances. But its doing that by sacraficing insane amounts of troops and equipment. That is why the depots are emptied out and that is what we seeing
    1
  573.  @dedster3164  is not what? They have still tanks in depot. Covert proves that. The number is shrinking rapidly. Covert proves that. I or him never said anything else. Keep on topic my boy.
    1
  574.  @dedster3164  easy. They still have stuff left at the depot. Old junk, but they still can repair some of it and press it into battle. Yet they actually build New tanks, but its nowhere near enough to meet the demand
    1
  575. ​ @milosmitrovic3239 first of all. You seem to like the idea of russia stealing territory with violence. Second he doesnt talk about the Overall war. He tries to estimate remaining gear of russian storage. Thats it
    1
  576. So russia defeated over 10.000 tandk and 5000 aircraft
    1
  577. ​ @Svalsorim dont know what this stupid ceply is supposed to mean. Yeah he counts. Meaning hard facts are presented here. If you dont like those facts it doesnt change them
    1
  578. Nope kid. Just counting tsnks in storage bases. Nothing about shovels or anything else
    1
  579. Another troll thinking ukraine is governed by US
    1
  580.  @AbuBakr-gm6bf  what this war shows us is thst russia needs 50 shells to kill one enemy soildier. Russia is using 50 years old cannons and just flattern areas ww2 style. Hitting individual vehicles is next to impossible for them. As long as the ukrainians are on the move they can safe their tanks.
    1
  581. Spoiler the 155 would be destroid a week before a abrams would come in reach of the canon
    1
  582. No they lost because in the dessert mounten or jungle it is easy to hide and ambush
    1
  583.  @ali-haider5788  no but they had a massive AA network build up in decades of either sovjet or american wapons. Just one example iraq had over 2000 american hawk missles
    1
  584. Iraq was at the time by sheer numbers the 4th largest army of the World. In the first Golf war they had over 8000 tanks, and around a million regular army. Iraq was in fact much langer than ukraines army
    1
  585. China opened up to free Marketing Systems and basicly turned from Sozialismus to capitalustic dictatorship. That is the reason
    1
  586. ​ @DreamyCheshire-up9rf it is not about having the Courage. They could bomb every position of russia in ukraine within weeks. But then a nuclear war would start, See the problem
    1
  587.  @centeroftheuniverse7196  Cause this special military operation claim only serves one purpose. To hide the truth from the russian people. It is so obvios it is depressing none russians fall for it. Intervention wars are still wars. That is why iraq was called a war.
    1
  588. Why you calling the war special military operation
    1
  589. Nope kid. They shelled kyiv multiple times. But theough Chaos in logistsics, ambushes and harsh resistenve the russians couldnt have entered kyiv
    1
  590. The US doesnt carpet bomb. It is a waste of time and resourced
    1
  591.  @johngrier4331  yeah. Except israel is prepaired to shot down thousands of missles and drones. As is shows in the previos conflicts.
    1
  592. What excactly did they achieve
    1
  593.  @rad1930  even in asow many are just Regularien people. And besides that there is the 99.99% of population. Judging an entire coutry cause of a few hundred guys is like judging entire USA because of mike pence and trumpster
    1
  594. Yeah like that Wagner comander and hos nazi Symbols. So russia is also right wing in your opinion
    1
  595.  @ttmallard that all depends on your opinion. As we already figured out your 10×1 desth rate is just made up. So if they out of everything. Russia should not have any problems taking all of ukraine. Or even bakhmut
    1
  596.  @ttmallard  ah so shooting missles at civilians is a war crime. Ok when will you be sad about the tenthousands of ukrainian civilians who died through russian shelling. Qhat excact incident are you talking about
    1
  597.  @ttmallard  Well nobody beliefed ukraine couldt stand even a mounth in feb. Ukraine is always in for suprises. Yes they can tske back crimea. Will they eventualy we dont know.
    1
  598.  @ttmallard  your Problem is that for some reason you fall for the russian state propaganda which is showing russia as unbeatable. It is not, not even close. Their last wars Show this
    1
  599.  @ttmallard  Well you have no evidence what so ever of UK influencing the peace talks kid. Why is it that everybody thinks that russia is unbeatable. They last allmost all wars in the last 100 years. Sign a treaty aha. Like the treaty ffom 1991 when russia granted security, independence and freedome to ukraine in exchange for nukes
    1
  600.  @ttmallard  you forget that the russians face the excact same problems. In fact worse, because aperently Winter clothing along with basic equipment is missing. They couldnt even hold cherson. Your demilitarasation only works for russia aperently.
    1
  601.  @ttmallard  nope they basicly didnt admit to anyithing. According to them they lost 14.000 men. Which is of course bs. Your 300 dead per day claim is already of outside observers. Basicly we dont know. We can only gues. Estimates range geom 100k to 150k. Your claim of 10 to 1 rate is clearly bullshit. Russians and ukrainians now have equal waponry. Ukrainians are evidently far higher in morale, and get huge survailence and equipment of the West.
    1
  602. Sure. Where is the source for that. And your number would mean that around 600 k ukrsinians are already dead.
    1
  603.  @hansharz9934  the special Operation is only a destraction aiming to confuse fools like you. It Sounds better that is all. Second the bombing of iraq actually Was highly effective. After one mounth iraq was taken. All in all the invasion caused less then 50 k casaulties. Mostly military. They expected to just take a weak ukraine and annex it. Now this sparing of civilians is a cheap joke.
    1
  604. Kherson wasnt empty. And they left behind huge bunch of material again. No they have just the dignity to fire randomly in cities and destroy important infrastrucuture to freeze the population. They know they cant win militarly, so they try to sparks riots and uprising by cripling the energy grid
    1
  605. No boy. Russians kill ukrsinians
    1
  606.  @uberbeeg  Also the russians need time to build up factories. please dont tell me you compare it to ww2, because that would be dumb AS. Tank plants, are highly specialised and complex factories, with specialy trained staff, rare machines and complex supply chain of parts. it will take years, especialy in a warzone.
    1
  607.  @uberbeeg  You are not aware of how economy works right? Rheinmetal is a german company, headquarter and Taxation in germany. That means all, delieveries, projects and factories abroad still fall under german armament export laws. I know this I am from germany and read about this struggle mounthly. every factory, RM builds, even in Europe, like the bomb factory in italy, still has to aproved by the german government. You can accept this fact or not, it doesnt change reality.
    1
  608. Rheinmetal is not Bypassing the government, every vehicle they produce there is still aprooved by the government. But dont coun to much into it. Till this plant will be operational, it will take years
    1
  609.  @catadoxas  i dont know what mic is supposed to be. But yeah fuck the USA and their wars. But what does that have to do with the demilitaradation of Nato
    1
  610. If they would have, the war ould already be over.
    1
  611.  @mirekslechta7161  what you basicly do. You pick some hosts and experts that fit your narative and claim them to be the only reliable source. Diapite objektive reality
    1
  612.  @mirekslechta7161  scott Ritter is a pro kremlin troll that also claims russia never wanted to take kyiw, and as you that they killed 14.000 civilians. Qhat is also not true. You beloved conel. Is often and asa csn tell only on fox news and info wars. To Media which are know for ther conservative propaganda. Especialy on Ticket carlson.
    1
  613.  @mirekslechta7161  would be interresting qhat kind of websites telling you that russian speaking was prohibited in ukraine. Propably a Telegramm channel. I tell you why this is bullshit. 1/4 of ukraine are russian speaking. Zelensky himself, a jew by the way is russian speaking and had to learn ukrainian. After election. Many Videos of russian speaking ukrainians in combat. In liberated villiges. Etc. There is no reason for ukraine to do that, and also it is not true. For given reasons. Bit fell free to cite a source. Give a link and i will tell you how it is bs
    1
  614.  @mirekslechta7161  you fell for russian propaganda in another way. Bowhere in ukraine was russian ever prohibited. Neither in public or in supermarkets
    1
  615.  @mirekslechta7161  ahm no. Many of the civilians and espaxialy the soildiers where ukrsinian speaking.
    1
  616.  @mirekslechta7161  by using the wrong number of hundred I conclude that you didnt read my comment in totall but more reliy on your playbook. So I will wait untill you read it in totall and then we talk
    1
  617. There is so much wrong with that. Ok. All in all 14.000 people died in donbass. 11.000 whete soildiers. Equal split on both sides. The other 3.000 where civilians, 1/3 on ukrainian side. And no not 100. 39 and you cant blame an entire country for the action of a mad mob in one city I know thst doesnt fit in your narative ha 😉
    1
  618. Well high tech wapons, Personal, reasearch and so on
    1
  619. No they have not. The reason for that, is that the military docrine is highly different, A Nato country would not waste such amounts of shells. They instead would target the airdefence and airforce, gain airsupieriority and then bomb the enemy ground forces.
    1
  620.  @Sveta7  Yeah I disagree with most media about this point. But additional some facts that you should take into the equation: Russias major missle waves vanished, They reactivate 60 year old t62 tanks, belarus transfered around a hundred t72 tanks to russia, a package of t90 m tanks meant for india was transfered to the military, Russia is asking, iran, belarus china and North korea for equipment and ammonition. the wagner group complained multiple times, about the lack of ammunition. This are all just facts. It doesnt mean russia will run out completly of certain things any time soon, but it shows the increasing demand of equipment from other nations. Why would they do that, if they are fully equipted? wouldnt it be in their favor to project streanght, like´´ we can do this on our own´´
    1
  621.  @Sveta7  no man just observable facts
    1
  622.  @Sveta7  No man. Many talked about logistical problems and byrocracy. Everyone that has a clue knows that russia would run out of shells. Well. What is the point of preserve those old missles. For what. They begin to degenerate year after year. everyone first shots older ammo before newer ones, because if the conflict ends, you can store the newer ones much easier. Also we see, the ukrainian energy grid is rebuild, mutiple strategic valuable targets in ukrane, Yet no missle waves are coming in anymore like they used to. Given that russia has a much smaller budget for its military and tried to keep up with the US, would impley that they have around the same missles stocks, plus one or two thousand. russia already used over 5000 missles in this war. one way or another they running low. maybe a few hundred left, they would like to preserve for a possible future conflict.
    1
  623. Nobody ever claimed they would run out if ammo. What is true thogh that their missle stockpiles are exhausted. Shot down missles show production rates of 2022. Meaning that they only can fire what they produce.
    1
  624. Wow 100 missles per day for six mounths. Interresting where you got that number from. That would be 100× 180= 18.000 missles. 2 million dollars per missle meaning 36.000.000.000 billion dollar. Production started 20 years ago. So you wann tell me that they spend almost 5 percent of budget per year for kalibr. Not very convincing. Also if they have such a huge number, why didnt they started the war with much more missles, why do they use missles produced in 22 if they have many older ones. Why strugle to buy iranian missles and drones
    1
  625. The reason why this was possible, is because wapons back thsn where realy simple and could easely mass produced. That is not possible today
    1
  626. That used to be the case in cold war. Not anymore today. Also US military relieys less on artillery like russia and more on airforce.
    1
  627. No they qould nwver do it because articöe 5
    1
  628. Fair enough, but what does a squad of infantry man do against 2 km range missle
    1
  629. They have expierenced tank Crews already. Tanks are easy to operste and usually it takes 3 mounths to teach a Crew, less if the Crew already has expierience
    1
  630. I heard about a dozen, from oryx
    1
  631.  @pro_wie8299   No. Iran is something else than irak.going to war With Iran would mean also declere war to dozens of militias in the middle east. A very competent anti Air System and navy. Not to mention Trouble With russia and possible China
    1
  632.  @pro_wie8299  there ist absolutly No doubt that Iran or a Allied force caused this Attack. But If they would openly Claim this Saudi arabia would have No Other Option than start a war.
    1
  633. Iran and Saudi-Arabia are deadly enemys
    1
  634. Well aperently they still have a substantial amount in storage
    1
  635. Well so where are those messing tanks
    1
  636. He pointed that out. Also this was only one example. He also didnt counted heavily rusted ones
    1
  637. Well iraq was one of the biggest military powers on earth
    1
  638. The military budget under biden is even higher than trumps. But the US army doesnt need thousands of tanks anymore.
    1
  639. Yeah at two storage bases. Which are counted here
    1
  640.  @definitelyfrank9341  the sheer fact that you dont know that Bramsche tanks arrived in late 2023 shows me that you didnt done your research at all.
    1
  641. Well it isnt. So far 6 confirmed losses of abrams tanks. 3 damaged. That is like ine per mounth. Russia sometimes looses this number a day. The easy answer is, drones and ATGMs. So far they recieved abrams without advanced Anti drone systems
    1
  642. We where only able to produce few anti particles
    1
  643. It is not secret it is known for 40 years now
    1
  644. Those are are not secret.
    1
  645.  @pieter-bashoogsteen2283  Video titles. Is the russian military failing? Where is the russian airforce? How many tanks does russia have left? Is ukraine winning?
    1
  646. Well then you mist the last 10 videos
    1
  647. Not realy. They took iraq in a mounth.
    1
  648. Oh there are many reasons to asume that. Russia has a huge military compared to its economy. Especially its nuclear arsenal. Nukes are expansive to build, maintain and store. We already saw the extreme corruption and inability of its military. And we know that russia always claims to be bigger thsn it is. So while they propably have multiple hundred or even thousands funktional nukes, the peobability for many, habing malfuncrions or are lacking expansive isotopes i high
    1
  649. ​ @Boris-do5rs  kiddo Russia is not even fighting Nato. And of course a2000 year old book tells us about modern day wars. Got it kid
    1
  650.  @davidmiller5028  not in the beginning. Back then there where not even 100k troops in combat. The mass mobilisation took place in the summer. And nope they just where relocated to the east
    1
  651. In fact including all reserves russia thrown in it was 250 k soildiers.
    1
  652.  @germansoldierman.17  Well that is not good my man. You should visit a doctor.
    1
  653. ​ @germansoldierman.17 no kid confirmed by picture. Also why is russia pulling out obsolete 70 year old tanks and asks Nortkorea for help if they do so well
    1
  654. ​ @digitaldazzle5836 we gave them 5% of Nato budget worth of equipment. Even stronger wapons are on the way. Already russia cant hold their lines.
    1
  655. So why are they buying arms grom north korea 😘
    1
  656. Dude they are losing. They must win this war otherwise they lose any intimidation, and capability to suppress neighboring countries. They should use almost everything.
    1
  657. Shoting down russians
    1
  658. Keep crying orc
    1
  659. They didnt. A battery consists of multiple launchers, comand Module and radar. Which are seperated by distance. So they might damaged one part the others are still working
    1
  660. Well the fact, that ukrain was literly surraunded by russia, and russia claims to have the biggest land force on earth. Yes it was likly ukraine would fall. And if incompetence wasnt so wide spread, they would have taken kiyv
    1
  661. Funny they basicly say the same as covert does
    1
  662. Ah ukrainian army is killed long ago. So all the ukrainian speakimg soildiers are US Autors I gues
    1
  663. Well sometimes yes. But way to few to controll the skys and bomb the UAF
    1
  664. This is a conventional war with clear frontlines. There are hundreds of targets. But russia still struggles to attack them
    1
  665. Yeah right. Except all of Mariopol is destroid. Multiple school, hospitals and Kindergardens where hit. Clusterbombs all over the place.
    1
  666. Yeah mariopol thanks the russians for the liberarion of their rubbel. The very fact that they couldt knock out the ukrsinian aurdefence and still get shot down is an embarresment
    1
  667. Nop just numbers
    1
  668. So why they dont just bomb kiew with bombers
    1
  669. What a silly liar you are
    1
  670.  @Boris-do5rs  lets make a deal. You finally tell me where this 17 to one ratio is comming from and I give you my source ;)
    1
  671.  @Boris-do5rs  no Radar can see over the horizon, that is not how light works. That is why russia and Amerika have early waring Radar planes. You know literly nothing kid
    1
  672.  @Boris-do5rs  they cant in fact not. They can see a bit better with low frequency. But only so much. A b21 100 km away is invisible regardless.
    1
  673.  @Boris-do5rs  And accourding to you russia has a very great success with SU57. Something you still refuse to provide evidence for. So accourding to you russian stealth is great, while amerikan stealth is obsolet. Wtf
    1
  674.  @Boris-do5rs  nope you repeat what he tells you. You can in theory see stealth better with low frequency but.but only at a certsin distance. And it lightd the Radar Station up like a christmas tree, risking getting detected by AR missles.
    1
  675.  @Boris-do5rs  you made the claim. Meaning unless you just made it up, you must have red it somewhere. So where was that
    1
  676.  @Boris-do5rs  those drones have 600 km plus reach. So you dont have any evidence for wctive use of Su57, you also refuse to provide evidence for this 17 to 1 claime. You are thereofore just a confused russian fanboy. Fait enough. Took you long enough
    1
  677.  @Boris-do5rs  I am not amerikan so I dont watch amerikan news mate. Just present your proof for that 17 to one ratio. Or any proof for SU57 in Action in ukraine
    1
  678.  @Boris-do5rs  1. Cause to this very moment you refuse to give any evidence for use of SU57 in ukraine 2. You ignore the varios shotdowns of very manuverable russian planes. 3. You Mix stealth with manuvrrbility. What is it now
    1
  679.  @Boris-do5rs  BTW. Your rambling about g forces shows that you dont have any idea how AA missles work. They dont follow you around they aim and fly in an almost straight path. All sovjet fighter jets cn perform 7 g plus turns. But it didnt help them in ukraine did id
    1
  680.  @Boris-do5rs  ok again. Where is this 17 to zero comming from
    1
  681.  @Boris-do5rs  Is that so. Accourding to who?
    1
  682.  @Boris-do5rs  And again if apperently in your world the stealth Features of the SU57 work good enough. Therefore the F35 is not obsolete. In fact its the opposite
    1
  683.  @Boris-do5rs  the Su35 sure. We saw them in active combat since 2012. But to this day we never saw a definitive Action of the SU57.
    1
  684.  @Boris-do5rs  Oh wow. You changed your mind 180 degrees. First you claimed stealth and the F35 is obsolet. Now you claim those super dupa SU57 are invisible. Wow that went bad for you
    1
  685.  @Boris-do5rs  BTW every stealth plane is visible at a certain range. Its just math. RCS and distance. There is no white and Black here. There is RCS and the question how low it is. And if its low enough you can ewcape Radar. Like Amerika did in dozens of conflicts
    1
  686.  @Boris-do5rs  Ah I see. So miss spelled. You wrote SU35. So to this very day there is no confirmed use of SU57. Every single time people claime it, it was debunked. Accourding to russia itself. It has a RCS equivalent to a cruese missle. Around 0.1 sqm. And when russia claims something its much worse usually. BTW. If an awacs on Nato territory cant see somethin at the russo ukrainian border, means nothing. If its far away enough it is not detectable. If a non stealthy cruese missle flies by at 400 km, you cant see it with an awacs. You dont understand what you are talking about.
    1
  687.  @Boris-do5rs  we talked about how valuable stealth is. And you come up with a none stealth aircraft. What is your point
    1
  688.  @Boris-do5rs  but what on earth is this silly Story supposed to mean in the context. We talked about stealth my boy.
    1
  689.  @Boris-do5rs  And once ukraine got modern AA Systems they didnt anymore. Now they use glide bombs, cause they csnt penetrate ukrainian airspace with planes, anymore.
    1
  690.  @Boris-do5rs  Yes If. But what is your evidence for that. And what excactly is far. 100 km 200 km
    1
  691.  @Boris-do5rs  nope its not gone. That is the reason why stealthy cruese missles are passend rusdias airdefence. That is why almost every larger nation is building stealth planes
    1
  692. Sure
    1
  693.  @Srdjan93tl  actually ukraine is mostly flat farm Land. Also the desert was a huge benefit for the air defence in iraq
    1
  694. What is the lie here?
    1
  695. Only about 1200 are fighter aircraft
    1
  696. Ah that is why the now have to buy wapons from north korea and Iran. Tell when they found this 1.5 Mio. Winter uniforms
    1
  697. It has been war since day war
    1
  698.  @jd5787  wow quiet easy to laugh sbout that claim. Clip of launching su34 a mounth ago. Channel the sun. Clearly seeing anti air missles there. Every aircraft carries anti air missles just in case even saudi arabian bombing their neighbor.
    1
  699.  @jd5787  since the russian retreat of kiew they barly made huge adnavces. And now they are at where they used to be 4 mounth ago, but with much less equipment, poor moral and a supirior ukrainian army in Front of them.
    1
  700.  @jd5787  You canot even dare to call a war a war. You are not in russia where you have to fear police comming to you for that. Just say war and the spirit of truth will come to you.
    1
  701.  @jd5787  still no proof for your 2 million claim but i take that as a point for myself.
    1
  702.  @jd5787  but what is the source for your falsch Informationen I am courioss.
    1
  703.  @jd5787  oh wow that is impresive. Except it is not true. They plan to increase the number to over a million in the next years. But this takes time and if the equipment is barly enough and funktional now, what do you think they will have when they increase their military. I mean. Even know they already reliy on t62s and 50 year old trucks and su24 aircraft.
    1
  704.  @jd5787  you clearly do not know anything. Russian army consists roughly 900.000 men. But only about 250.000 are combat troops. Take the losses wounded out and those who have to protest russian borders and you see that russia is on the Limit.
    1
  705. Overused shill argument. Nobody claimed that in the first weeks. But indeed they ran out of man so they had to mobilise. They did run out of missles so they had ro build new ones and buy from iran and north korea
    1
  706. 1) he often admits that there are warhouses but he takes them into the count. But most is stored outside. 2) nope he doesnt. He says it kinda meets the confirmed combat losses. 3) nope. He takes open source research, which uses footage to confirm losses.
    1
  707. Did you even watched the video?
    1
  708. Russia was running out of ammo. And they did. Then the increased production and bought millions of shells by north korea
    1
  709. So what excactly is there to cope in counting guns on pictires
    1
  710. @bybenzo9699  wow. You know nothing my boy apperently. What equipmentlies, is consistent temperature and dry air. The excact oposite of siberia. Get educated
    1
  711. @genchebanu  those experts are well aware of all of those words. Yes they Form New units and yes they they bring back old stocks of equipment. But it the Reduktion pf depot stocks of over 60 percent speaks a clear language. Russia is scraping the Barrel and the depots run dry sooner or later
    1
  712. @genchebanu  you have seen them using newly produced ones? Did you saw the production date on them while flying. In actuallity the russian missle production reached a hight of over 100 klibre and KH101. So quiet high. Apperently they empfiehlt there depots in late Februar. Of 2023. Accourding to american intellegence anyway...
    1
  713. @genchebanu  well they did run out of missles in 2023. Then they started hige production lines. When we say they run out of missles, we mean the stockpiles dry up.
    1
  714.  @genchebanu  russia uses a dozen different barrels from guns produced in the 40s 50s and 60s. Just launch a production line for those is not as easy as it sounds.
    1
  715.  @genchebanu  I did it myself in military service my boy. But the problem is most of those Systems are not produced anymore and have to be cnabalised for others
    1
  716. Not if most remaining guns are in Bad shape
    1
  717. ​ @stone1er371 sure thing mate. They just love to buy inaccuarate and low quality ammo with International backlash. They used their own stockpiles and dried them up over 2 years. Its that simple
    1
  718.  @engineerenginering8633  wellappetently not. Otherwise the would habe won long time ago
    1
  719.  @nematolvajkergetok5104  not a mystery. YT deletes links in comments for Spam protection.
    1
  720. In actuallity russia is down from 60.000 shells a day in 2022 to less then 10.000 in 2024
    1
  721. You Sound like tgat would be a good thing. Russia is battleing ukraine with 5 percent of Nato budget as aid. The reason why russia uses sovjet era Material cause this is most what they have. Imagine we gave ukraine 400 f16 2 years ago. Or 2000 tanks 2 years ago. Or 160 himars instead of 16.
    1
  722. Well nobody said this to begin with.
    1
  723.  @joelfisk  The guardian. You misrepresent the article. It says 50% of its initial invasion force/ tanks At that time russia lost more then 700 tanks. That is more then half of the Initial invasion force. So correct..
    1
  724.  @joelfisk  I should have been more specific. Nobody, whoms opinion matters and understands something about the topic.. So not a novelist in a magazine, which worships the rich class. Tge guardian. You misrepresent what they said. They talked about the Initial invasion force. Stop changing the facts
    1
  725.  @joelfisk  yeah nobody suspected they would run out of tanks.
    1
  726. Nobody said this. We only see they have extreme high losses
    1
  727. Tanks are much harder to produce so yes they could run out
    1
  728. How many do they build per mounth.
    1
  729. Kiddo. You didnt even whatched the video
    1
  730. Nope
    1
  731. Watch the video
    1
  732. Not quiet. They lost more than that. Also they have to loot tanks for spare parts
    1
  733. Article.....
    1
  734.  @jimallison2827  greedings. But there is something else. Russian troops are known for having poor Training and low vallue of life. So they might just throuw them into battle after basic training
    1
  735.  @jimallison2827  i was in the german army for 5 years we where considert as action ready after 1 and a half years. Earliest moment
    1
  736. Also your numbers only mean production numbers. Gues what over half of those tanks are sold to other countries, pulled out of Service or are just to old
    1
  737. There are already two of them
    1
  738. There is one. Name how many tanks does russia have left
    1
  739. There are two Update s
    1
  740.  @strawwalker8177  So that is it. That is you proof. The messed up recruitment in the Army.
    1
  741.  @strawwalker8177  i gues you have no proof what so ever. So dont start
    1
  742. Wow. That woild mean less than france 🤣. Dont go to far kid.
    1
  743. By gaining 150 sqkm within a year and loosing around 100.000 troops in the process? Not quiet winning.
    1
  744. Nope F35 can fly in bad weather, has been deployed thousands of times and is produced by the hundreds for dozens of nations. Nobody wants to buy SU57 and they produced not even a dozen of them
    1
  745. No they didnt. For several reasons. There is no evidence of that whatsoever. They would not needed them, cause they had totall airsupiriority in syria.
    1
  746. SEAD missions
    1
  747. A limbing grany can intercept a 200kmh porche.
    1
  748. Are they? How much of ukraine did they took in one year. Finally 1 percent?
    1
  749. Quote. An army marxhes on its stomach. Greatly seen when they run out of fuel and had to loot for food in stores
    1
  750. Cause they still cant penetrate ukrainian airspace.
    1
  751.  @noballsbigshaft4486  Nothing realy has changed but if you throw tanks and man into the meatgrinder without respect of human life, the best fortress can slowly breake. The russians three insane amounts of stuff into Bullterrier and we saw hundreds if tanks and IFVs destroyed. But ukraine has only so much wapons. Its realy a irony. Populations like russians, whos state cares the least for them, are apperently most accepting of dying for their dictator. Same with russians under stalin, hitler or Mao.
    1
  752.  @noballsbigshaft4486  that is just unter nonsense. Russia heavily shells adjicka since summer. The main force attacks adjivka since Mai with heavy units. Starting in Pisky. But we all know where this is comming from. Russia isnt even trying right. That is why they dont win
    1
  753.  @noballsbigshaft4486  and no its not. If you follow the frontline adjivka wistood russian attacks for two years now. The battle of adjivka is lasting 9 mounths now. That is longer than any siege in ww2. This is an embarresment for russia
    1
  754.  @noballsbigshaft4486  Translation. There is no prove of any action of the su57
    1
  755.  @noballsbigshaft4486  nd what do they say. Ukraine gets problems. Problems mean the russians have conquered another street in adjivka. Every week of this conflict is another embarressment for russia
    1
  756. Easy. F35 is much harder to maintain, requires much more facilities and trained personal. Also its much more eypansive then f16s
    1
  757. Still active
    1
  758. No kid. Just observation
    1
  759. And still standing
    1
  760. Its not. Not a single Nato soildier is fighting. Not a single Nato fighterjet is in combat.
    1
  761. What is false here
    1
  762. Why do you claim they lost it. 80% of ukraine is free and the front is more or less stabile for a year now
    1
  763. Kremlin troll
    1
  764. The US is not at war with russia. They dont send their airforce or missles into russia
    1
  765. What happened to the adjivka offensive. Flop
    1
  766.  @AniMageNeBy  the ukrainian electrical grad was not destroyed by glide bombs my boy. Neither Was it by jets. It was mostly destroyed by huge waves of iranian drones and low vost cruese missles. No matter how good you are eventually you run out of ammo or some get zhrough
    1
  767.  @AniMageNeBy  so yes russia established a strip of a few dozen km of kind of airsuperiority. Within ukraine however, russia has no airsuperiority
    1
  768.  @AniMageNeBy  you dont know anything, do you. Those FABs are launched from deep in russian territory. Out of reach of ukrainian air defences
    1
  769. Still active though
    1
  770.  @ritabratagoswami7724  no it has not. Such a shape would not make any airodynamic sense. But keep telling yourself that
    1
  771.  @ritabratagoswami7724  nope. The FAB 500 has rounded head. The internal warhead of the khinzal is angled. Sorry made. They indeed intercepted one
    1
  772. Actually they did. They provided pictures of the warhead
    1
  773. Verified? By who? The kremlin?
    1
  774. No they dont. And you have no evidence what so ever
    1
  775. Cause every week thousands of russians die
    1
  776. You mean the country where 1/4 of people dont have access to toilets?
    1
  777. Get your spelling right
    1
  778. Russia always starts propaganda canpain whenever they use new wapon Systems. After all they want to soll them abroud
    1
  779.  @UmbraHand  yes. That was the time before stealth. Now all major powers have stealth aircraft. If the SU57 is as nearly as good as russia claims, they should have used it by now
    1
  780.  @UmbraHand  russia needs airsuprimacy and the best way to achieve this is SEAD missions with stealth aircraft, cause cruise missles need a lot of time ro prepair. The comparrisson with the B-58 is complete trash, cause it never was Intendant to operate in highly Contests airspace. It is a slow Bomber. The su57 is supposed to be a stealth all around aircraft.
    1
  781. The b58 was not stealth
    1
  782. Amerika never used russian parts in their military aircrsft. They are Not even allowed to do this. Btw the F35 for the marine corps is a Version for vertical take off. Its in production for 15 years now Try better next time..
    1
  783. They didnt. They still strugle to gain ground against one country with 5 percent of Nato budget
    1
  784. They literly used every wapon system they have excpect su57 and t14. Both are only abailable in miniscule numbers
    1
  785. No they dont
    1
  786. Russia itself claims to only have 8 of them operational , my little troll
    1
  787. And you guys cant prove any of this
    1
  788. So they hope to defend against Nato with 6 planes. Completly untested aircraft
    1
  789. Russia usually propagandizes its next gen wapins when used.
    1
  790. And of course you have proof for any of this right
    1
  791. Easy, cause they cant afford to station them near the front. Russia launches FABs from multiple km behind the front and imidiatly turn back.
    1
  792. What is misinformation here
    1
  793.  @klardfarkus3891  oryx. A Organisation of volunteers collected footag of shot down aircraft as evidence. Just because you dont like it, doesnt mean its propaganda
    1
  794. Confirmed by footage, russia lost around 120 aircraft. Including helicopters
    1
  795. The houthi attacks on israel where all intercwptes.
    1
  796. The houthis simply lie. They attacked non israeli ships several times.
    1
  797.  @azmagaref  website is called oryx. And they die this for many years in many conflicts now. And turnes out in syria iraq And turky they were quiet accurate. You can laugh and fool around as much as you want but this is as close as you can get from the outside. But still you didntexplained your source for that bullshit number of 1200 vehicles
    1
  798. There is a Website called oryx which counts destroyed vehicles by footage
    1
  799. Better question is were your data is comming from. He acrually counted the tanks via satalite
    1
  800. Funny. Where did you got this fake numbers from?
    1
  801. That israely report is bullshit and doesnt come from the government. It is fake news spread on social media. Especialy the tank losses.
    1
  802. Russia struggles to even make progress in ukraine.
    1
  803. Wow that is a lot of conspiracy coolaid😂
    1
  804. This is bullshit. UK has 70
    1
  805. What are you talking about. This thing has less then half VLC than an american destroyer mate
    1
  806. Do you see major victories for russia? No? So yes they are winning
    1
  807. Ahm yes there is. Because russian tanks are slaughtered in ukraine
    1
  808.  @sibeerijachannel6828  even if true. That would barly enough to arm two battalions. Also only idiots are bragging about big gun go boom. A single ATGM go even more boooom and Transfer this golden russian cow into hell. Every modern tank can easaly penetrate others. Call me back as soon as they actually start mass production or actuall combat footage of t14 in combat. Both are not to be seen untill now.
    1
  809.  @societyreborn33  Well obviosly you seem to think that this is a very important wapons system, while in fact russia had no further success despite using hundreds of them. It is just a very expansive bomb, which performs a mission that can be done by any modern stealthy cruise missle for a fraction of the cost.
    1
  810. Hypersonic wapons are no superwapon. They are basicly just a very fast 500 kg bomb. Ukraine was able to hit strongly defended Objekts with stealthy and much cheaper cruise missles
    1
  811. Yeah except Crew survivabilty
    1
  812. Sure lets hold back our best wapons. Because its not like they are build for war
    1
  813. Sure
    1
  814. Well they claimed it to be a super tank. And then they dont use it
    1
  815.  @JustifyJustin  why? Because every war party in human history has a great interrest of ending wars as quickly as possible. This idea of russia beeing happy to prolong the war is laughable. The war is incredible expansive. Their human and equipment losses are almost unpresidented in the post ww2 time. Russia used every wapon in their arsenal multiple times and has 95% of its combat units in action. Yet already thousands of Videos of russians complaining of lack of supplys, equipment even payment appeared. Further mobilisation not only overstretch already stretched supply lines. Also it would basicly destroy the russian economy which accourding to the russians themself sufferes the severest worker shortage since 1995
    1
  816. ​ @JustifyJustin oh its not like wapons are build for war. Its not like they could test their best equipment. In fsct the t14 is just scap Metal
    1
  817. Well because it complicates logistics and you sacrafice trained crews if you just let them destroy all of the old tanks
    1
  818. Tell me if they finally win the 3 days special military operstion
    1
  819. Well that is a bit much. They actually xan shot, drive and there is footage from inside. But they propably are to unreliable to actually be used
    1
  820. Well russia hast achieved anything substantial in the last half of a year. They lost insane amounts of equipment and men. So western wapons work quiet well
    1
  821.  @JoeyLima-pw2bk  you Lack basic comon sense. If you invade another country with thousands of tsnks and soildiers. Bomb cities and kill people this is a war. War doesnt mean all pf the economy is in war Mode. There are different stages of escalation, but it is a war after all.
    1
  822.  @JoeyLima-pw2bk  oh and btw. If you are not even brave enough to call a war a war. What is the poitn of discussing with you 😉
    1
  823.  @JoeyLima-pw2bk  and no. russia is not fighting all of Nato. If that would be the case russia already would be anihilated. Nato provided around 5% of its budget in equipment. Most of it old. Not a single modern fighterjet and very few cruese missles.
    1
  824.  @JoeyLima-pw2bk  you didnt read my comment. In terms of militsry tech they did wverything they could to keep it in friendly nations
    1
  825.  @JoeyLima-pw2bk  the difference is america isnt highly dependend from imports of hostile countries. At least not for military tech. And if russian tech is so competent. Why is the russian military failing. They where supposed to storm ukraine in a single week. Yet they dont even have 20% and still loosing grou d
    1
  826. ​ @JoeyLima-pw2bk yes russias military tech is very primitive. They rely heavily on western tech and without it it is almost impossible to build any advanced wapons
    1
  827. It is not in production. Even russia admits that.
    1
  828. They wont use them for the same reason USA didnt used them in Vietnam
    1
  829. S350 doesnt exist. S400 is basicly an upgrade to s300
    1
  830. ​ @James-9999 russia yoesnt have so many t72s to begin with
    1
  831. 😂😂😂. Off topic kid
    1
  832. 😂😂😂😂 cope harder ivan
    1
  833. Nope what happened is that they did massive damage to the russian army. But russia has basicly 50 years of arms production. But apperently they begin to have Cracks in their inventory. Who would have thought that russia has to buy shells from north korea
    1
  834. Currently hard at work again
    1
  835. Shuty up ivan. Didnt your ma told you to be quiet when adult talk
    1
  836.  @Sveta7  yes but we talked about byractar lol. So stick to the talking point buddy. And again. Those drones should have been easy shots for russia. But they were so incopetent they didnt even activated their AA Systems. And yet after a more thsn a whole year of War. The Ukrsinian airforce snd ukrainian AA system is still active. How is that possible. I thought russia is the second best army in the world
    1
  837.  @Sveta7  unfortunatly for you we got clips of bayractar destroying ammo storages until late Oktober. But fascinating in the first place is, we saw bayractar destroying AA Systems of russia. Many of them in the first weeks. Meaning the russians were so inkompetent, they didnt even activated their systems to down the drones.
    1
  838. The sheer fact that it took them so long to destroy the drones showes how inkompetent russia is.
    1
  839. Your dumb comment showes how deep you digged in the russian narative. Calling the Ukrsinian police Gestapo is the stupiest thing so far down here
    1
  840. Sure ivan. Any evidence for that, or just another orc lie
    1
  841. Not realy they worked quiet well
    1
  842. Like they destroyed 342 from the 16 delivered Systems?😂 Provide evidence or shut up
    1
  843. ​ @Pauli650 you are Not a good listener 😂
    1
  844. Well it was a Internet myth. Ukrsinian officials never even mentioned him. Neither did covert. So your request is pointless
    1
  845. ​ @tonyp2865 kid you dont even know that the so called coup was not a coup by Definition. Yanokowitch was thrown out by his own party. And the two elections since where as free and independent as they can.
    1
  846.  @tonyp2865  Well if you dont have any arguments, your comments means nothing. Just calling others sheeps or sleepwalkers doesnt give you any legitimacy
    1
  847. What is funny, you guys seem to think Nato is in comand here. Ukraine could have negotiated all the time. But they choose to fight for their territories
    1
  848. Because they work. Ukraine recieved 16 himars Systems. And it was a huge pain in the ass for russia. Imagine what a hundred can do
    1
  849. Cause the russian use insane amounts of landmines
    1
  850. the number of them is not as neccessary as the amount of missles.
    1
  851. It isnt
    1
  852. Ahm how is it doing bad. Confirmed losses are around 50 vehicles in 4 weeks. By this they gained 3 times more ground than russia in half a year. While most of the crews survived the Hit. Everything is fine
    1
  853. Because they heading for the most fortified positions of russia. With mines, artillery and Anti tank missles. But their crews survived most the times
    1
  854. Well already almost 100 destroyed T90 of different variants. Confirmed by picture. How many Leopards are confirmed to be destroyed? 5 or 6
    1
  855. To be honest. Although its far from the edge curring super wapon they claimed it. Ukrainian sources say its harder to kill cause its ammo storage has blast shields. Modern battlefieldfielda are just hostile to tanks of any type
    1
  856.  @minutlight  nope kid oryx open source intellegence Website. Proved by picture and video footage. 😉 Oh btw. Not everyone lives in your shitty country. So there are thousands of other Media available. 😊
    1
  857. Almost jeah. Over 100 T90 lost. Compared to half a dozen leopard. Difference is, they never Explorer and the Crew survived
    1
  858. Nope they didnt. They went home, because they where tired of it. As long as they where there talibs couldnt do a thing
    1
  859.  @igormsh14bidevisualizacoes45  funny you all say this number of 35, meaning you all watch the same propaganda tweets from russian propaganda outlets. Listen. 1200 is a number they say without providing any evidence. When the field is searmed with hundreds of t90Ms I belive you. Untill then, you got nothing
    1
  860.  @igormsh14bidevisualizacoes45  not if you considering that they only have 70 of them.
    1
  861.  @davidmiller5028  the numbers are comming from the russian propaganda ministry so we can gues that it is actually half of that.
    1
  862. if thats the goal sure.
    1
  863.  @Cotac_Rastic  you are not realy good informed are you pal. The majority of troops are listed in the east, because this was the Most likly Fron in the Case of war. And now the military is moving the heavy wapons to the east. Only territorial defence is remaining. Also they killed ablot of orcs in kiyv and captured a Lot of material
    1
  864.  @juliuszkocinski7478  still the russians retreatet from the north, and compared sheer numbers the russians should win tomorrow
    1
  865. Well qe dont fight russia. Russia is fighting ukraine
    1
  866. Nope. Counting
    1
  867.  @alexmaccity  not cause of your poletical view. YT algorythm delets many comments of frequent posters recently. Mine as well. And I am on the good side of history unlike you. Keep it short and without links. Then it might work
    1
  868.  @alexmaccity  russia used up 60 years of sovjet and russian production. Gues how much that is.
    1
  869. The west isnt even fighting mate....
    1
  870. This doesnt work in many times.
    1
  871. Those numbers are completly unusable. Cause it was 10 years age and you dont know how many are actually in garages
    1
  872. ​ @historyisawesome6399 russia mobilised over 500.000 men in two waves. They send around half their prison population into war along with hundreds of thousands of volunteer contract soildiers
    1
  873. Numbers are taken directly from the russian government. Poor boy
    1
  874. Say it with me. I have my opinion, and I am an universal expert. Everything that doesnt fit my google search backed opinion must be lies and propaganda. Go....
    1
  875.  @bomjahed  hold on. Seriusly. So the crimes that happened two generations before I was even born, disqualifey me to make observations and critizise an evil war. In fact the russians should have learned even more. But time and time again they fall into dictatorship and let their leaders suppress them and other nations. Sad story. You supoort a regime that is basicly commiting genozide to ukraine. Yet you want to tell me how evil my ancastors where. Very sad story, kid
    1
  876.  @bomjahed  yes you dont know. Cause that is a dirty lie. I looked it up. What they do say is thst precice wapons are in short supply. And this is the case. Cause they barly launch any meaningfull waves of misles anymore. And btw. Hundreds of Videos of russian soildiers indeed imply that they are very short in supply.
    1
  877. Who claimed russia would run out of shells
    1
  878. Well He never claimed russia would run out any time soon. But aperently the rate dropped to 25.000 a days
    1
  879.  @dailynhicks2731  wow the amount of ignorance in that comment is stunning. Are you American? Such ignorance usualy I see in the USA
    1
  880. By getting invaded 😂
    1
  881. Most did.
    1
  882. Nobody claimed the run out of shells. But aperently the logistics are flaud
    1
  883. It aged lile fine wine. Russia cant push back ukrain anywhere. The massive barages from summer are gone. They by iranian and north korean missles now
    1
  884.  @clifflegrand4848  obviosöy not
    1
  885.  @clifflegrand4848  nope He didnt you didnt whatch the video
    1
  886. And He never claimed it wouldnt
    1
  887. Well the rate dropped down to 25k per dqy. And still covert did not claimed russia to run out yet.
    1
  888. Yes it is. By sheer numbers they should have won a year ago
    1
  889.  @palar4195  no kid. Russia and north korea openly announced it. Your bubbles get thicker
    1
  890.  @xisotopex  Yes it does. Cause if they have enough shells for themselfs they wont have to buy them from north korea
    1
  891. And now they have to buy shells drom notth korea
    1
  892. Didnt watched the video
    1
  893.  @clifflegrand4848  not artillery ahella nope. Watch the video
    1
  894. Well He didnt claimed russia would run out any time soon. You didnt whatched the Clip did you
    1
  895. He never claimed they would run out at this point 😉
    1
  896. Where you got thst number from
    1
  897. No and No Happy to help. And He made a Video about it
    1
  898. 😂😂😂 sad they csnnot make room for new trolls. The current ones are pathetic
    1
  899. ​ @BodilyFunction those rounds often are older than 50 years. That is dangoures
    1
  900.  @gaborrajnai6213  most Western airdefences did a good Job so far. Iris T for for example is reported to ha e a succhess rate over 90%
    1
  901.  @gaborrajnai6213  what is thst number supposed to mean.
    1
  902.  @IvanToman  russia destroid the three biggest trans lines to europe and attacked every big powerplant ther is. Russias goal was to freeze and starve ukraine into submission. Psychological warfare only is a thing if it works
    1
  903.  @IvanToman  you May have a point. AlthoughI dont understand why they do not target existing powerlines, which are like setting ducks. But there was an article from the Al jazera recently showing thst shot down missles have production dates of 2022. Keep in mind that russia shot more missles in one year thsn the US has in their entire tomohawk inventory. They will run out eventualy and it seems tnow is the time
    1
  904.  @IvanToman  nfm it was hot outside. XD Bit it doesnt change my point
    1
  905. He didnt claimed thst in spring but in summer. Also He is right. They waves of missles are now comming in mounths not days. Thst speaks for a very low number of rmaining missles
    1
  906. Depends on how many tanks they realy have. We cannot say for Sure. What we do know is that their numbers are highly inflated. But if we see they use t55s now I higly doubt they can sustain even one year
    1
  907. ​ @1GTX1  Well if they just broke down even worse kid
    1
  908. Breaking news. They did not. But you fall for something a russian oligsrch says
    1
  909. Problem is, you have to Man this tanks, you need fuel for them, repair them, difficult if you dont have spare parts. And it does matter if the ammo or the gun is old.
    1
  910. Well Kind of yes. You think russia has infinite resources
    1
  911. They do. But ancient ones. And ukraine never claimed to be a great power. Russia did.
    1
  912.  @francescozambaldi8212  Well they presicted russia is going low on modern tanks and missles in general. Both turnes out to be true. So what is the problem
    1
  913. Do they? So I gues putin is firring one general a week because everything is going so well
    1
  914. Well they used to hold back but now they throw everythin in they have. They count on their nukes as a valid shield. They now officialy used about the number of missles entire American army has. And they dont fire any regulary anymore. Pulling out 70 year old tanks is a move odäf desperation not Holding back
    1
  915. Nope the abrams is late 80s early 90s Design. And yes they are modernised sometimes. But dont forget. Many of These tanks were out in the elements for decades, without any Action. They are basicly using junk from a junk yard
    1
  916. And what are they gonna do with this hypersonics. Shot them into mals like they did last summer?
    1
  917. Not covert but oryx did
    1
  918.  @blue_ish4499  no the danish dont say that. In fact nobody knows how many tanks russia can produce. The only thing we know is what the russians themself tell us. And they will tell what ever the kremlin wants.
    1
  919. Well but if I have a Panzer Faust I would be less worried about the t55😂
    1
  920. So russia has infinite numbers or what
    1
  921. I didnt see any t14. And what would that do anyway. They currently have 60 t14 in totall. And their readyness is highly questionable
    1
  922. Hundreds ha. So then tell us who you know thst numbers.
    1
  923.  @adamg5780  nope war losses
    1
  924. And you have concrete proof for that number😂
    1
  925. ​ @Sveta7  and why wouldt they scrap them. What for. There is no vehicle they could use those parts for excapt other t55 or older versions
    1
  926. Well indeed there was a incident when a t14 was spottet in ukraine. But it makes sense to move t14 for repair and Upgrades. It wouldnt make any sense to move t55s
    1
  927. No they dont. Whatch his video again. And if this wouöd be the case, why sending t62 in such high numbers and complicate supply lines
    1
  928. No kid. It means almost every Leo is decades younger than t55 with far more advanced tech. If the russians would produce t34 right now it would be a good tank either
    1
  929. Well the loses are confirmed by picture by a volunteerly Initiative. Those 1500 tanks in production are coming from a higly corrupt lieing government official. Gues who is more trustworthy
    1
  930. Currently the rate dropped to 20.000 a day. We dont say they running out bit run low. If we see soildiers buying their own equipment, use rusty old ak47, and pull t55 out of storage, it is a clear sign they have problems
    1
  931. It is not easy to repair. Because spare parts are Not produced anymore.
    1
  932. Few are most ar not
    1
  933. Well aperently not the 4 year olds with cancer
    1
  934. Hi.ars are not cruise missles
    1
  935.  @userequaltoNull  not quiet true. The belarus regime is on its brinck of collapse. The only reason they are still standing is russias involvmend. The moment russia is failing is the day lukashenko is overthron
    1
  936. So what is BS here
    1
  937. There is. Russia openly admitted wapons trade last time when they where in north korea
    1
  938. There is no hard evidence, but russia admited negotiations and requests to NK. Well the thing is russia is running low on this equipment. You cant sustain such a materialistic war for almost a year without running low on everything. Imagine 50k artillery shells every day for almost half a year. Nk has a huge number of sovjet type wapons so the russians can buy and still produce the same stuff. So basicly 2x
    1
  939. They literly claimed for a decade ukrine belongs to them. Also tsking kyiv could have won them the war quick and clean. But they failed
    1
  940. In the Initial war days. It absolutly was. And their decleared goal now is to at least take all of the four regions they annaxed
    1
  941. This lie is spreading like a Virus. What is your proof that this actually happened. You got none. You just say it.
    1
  942. We dont try to conquere russia. We just try to help ukraine get the russins out of their Land. For that we give them what we csn spare without compromising our own capabilities. Also if Nato is so weak it tells you alot about putins lies and fearmongering of the threat Nato is to russia
    1
  943. Ukraine had 200k troops on day one
    1
  944.  @brotuscheruiyot9378  what happened to: ukraine is all to russia and get rid of the elected ukrainian government. They wanted to take ukraine and they failed. Not even ll of donbass is occupied. Of you lower your expectations to this they might not completly fail but calling this winning is silly
    1
  945. Not advancing at all, yes
    1
  946. Yes they wanted. Read putins texts
    1
  947. No just explenation of reality
    1
  948. No they did not. That is a fairytale the vatniks like to tell you at the fire. In actuallity they just sucked at logistics. Seen by the countless vehicles out of gas.
    1
  949. Ah so that is why they annaxed regions. And this is why putin claimed for years ukrsine to be a part of russia
    1
  950. They took ground Lots of it. More than russia gained in 7 mounths.
    1
  951. Just wittnessed the absolut embarressment of the russian offensive this week. What a chaos
    1
  952. How is russia doing
    1
  953. Mcgregor is a forcefully Regimes greedy old man, who would say everything to agree with russia.
    1
  954.  @jeffboothbyr.f.9249  Listen kid. If mcgreagor claims to know the true numbers He is lieing. And you know why. Cause nobody does. You just like what you hear thats why you tske everything He says for granted
    1
  955.  @jeffboothbyr.f.9249  both are pro russian shills and all the russian apologists always say those two names 🤣 hilarios. Often I hear them together with tucker carlson.
    1
  956. Did putin told you that number himself or did you just made it up in your head
    1
  957. The whole Nato forces 😂😂😂😂. Sure kid. We sended them like 200 tanks out of our storage of over 8000. And no airsforce. Not even a single defision. Bit they fight all of Nato right😂
    1
  958. What evidence do you have that this so called doomsday torpedo actually exists 😉. And it doesnt change anything. Once they launch it they get anihilated by thousands of nukes fired from sjbmarines and silos.
    1
  959. Simple. Obscene amounts of mines
    1
  960. Look at mariopol and you will know what libersted looks like
    1
  961. Yeah and for the Art year o so they tried offensive and failed
    1
  962. We heard that story hundreds of times. And its still bullshit. They senden around 50k, because they expected the government and militsry quickly to collapse. They thought they would dricr into the City cheered and waved at. Instead they failed one time after another and got stuck in a huge convoi
    1
  963. Yep. Right in the south
    1
  964. Sure why winning and ending a war quickly if you just can carry on loosing thousands of troops every week and billions worth of equipment. Because it is just so funny to do war right
    1
  965. How is ukrainians government a far right government. Zelenskys party is centre more social democratic leaining.
    1
  966.  @LostBeagle  just saying wrong is notngonna cut it mate. If Nato members dont want tondeploy their boys and risk ww3 its easy to invade them and organize a referendum with fake outcome
    1
  967. Cause it doesnt take as many equipment to invade the baltics.
    1
  968. 20 percent is funny. 😂 russia is confirmed to have lost more tanks then they had in active Service before the war. That is a bit more then 20 percent.
    1
  969. And jow many did they lost in their 2 year 3 day special military operation
    1
  970.  @МихайлоЛомоносов-э8б oh wow. funny boy. Any evidence for that or just typical vatnik speak from russia today
    1
  971.  @МихайлоЛомоносов-э8б  how many american troops are fighting in ukraine 😅
    1
  972. Funny russia lost more troops in ukraine then america since ww2 to steal 20% of ukraine in their 3 day special military operation
    1
  973. Are they finally in kiev
    1
  974. The russian troll who Supports a war of conquest and anahilation, crys again. How is bunker King putler doing. His 3 day special blyat operation is going for 2 years now
    1
  975.  @DiegoGarcia-nk8cj  no System is perfect. Most likly 10 percent come through. If they launched around 300 missles last week 30 come through. But aircraft especialy slow bombers are easy to shoot down
    1
  976. No they could not. The bombers dont reach kiev cause the air defence is still active and capable. But what happens to a city u der russian attack you csn see in bakhmut and mariopol
    1
  977. Do you realize that russia has ZERO right to be in ukraine? They attacked them to annax terrortiry and enforce their will. Ukraine asked for help defending itself. So we help them
    1
  978. Another kremlin troll
    1
  979.  @Kroq_Gar  lets start with losses, cause there is a lot nonsense in this. You claim 150k losses including injired. On average KIA and IIA are on a rate 1 to 2. That would mean 50k russians died in action. That is already wrong cause even russian state controlled puppet Olga Skabeyeva, admited in one of her shows that the russian military of defence secretly had to pay 220.000 families for compensation for dead relatives. A stunned silence followed. Keep in mind that doesnt count wagner forces which accourding to prigoshin surpassed 30.000 and the seperatists forces. So you are already wrong on that. What else could you be wrong about.
    1
  980. They did run out of soildiers, thst is why they did 3 mobilisations and used prison inmates for aussults. They do run low on tanks, that is why they now use t55s. They are on the defence, the only reason for them holding ground are the millions of mines they layed.
    1
  981. Did you watched the video mate
    1
  982.  @Ret_Army_Combat_Vet  then of course you csn present evidence for your claims
    1
  983. ​ @Ret_Army_Combat_Vet He also counted others but found few ro none IFVs there. Keep attention
    1
  984. They did. They ask north korea for help now. They stoped lsunching large missle attacks and yes they indeed stole Washington machines.
    1
  985. All He did is counting vehicles mate.
    1
  986. ​ @no-bodymr6419 we also see russian trains shipping t55s to russian frontal bases
    1
  987. He didnt say that
    1
  988. No not everything. But they dont have enough missles anymore to start large attacks and apperently they prepair 70 year old tanks now
    1
  989.  @Kroq_Gar  Well Provide any numbers witch prove your point
    1
  990. Is that so. So why is there still fighting and why is russia loosing ground
    1
  991. ​ @ХРЕНОРЕЗ Well this actually is the case. Rally any missles are fired anymore. Russia asks north korea and Iran for help and they fell behind ukraine in firing rate. So yes they do in fact run low and Nato didnt even invested 5% of their budget.
    1
  992. This number is pure fiction and you have no proof for that.
    1
  993. It actually did. Russia asks north korea for artillery and ammo now. They dont start any major missle attacks anymore. They bring 70 year old t55s into bsttle
    1
  994. He never claimed russia will run out soon. He just counted vehicles.
    1
  995. What?
    1
  996.  @jeansansterre6908  they losing 60 to 100 a day. Not 1000. according to ukr. Ministr. def. Cute attempt to LIE. Also they have half a million in reserve. To compare this war with ww2 is foolish. the russians make about 3 km a day. this is nothing. at this speed they will take donbass in maybe a mounth. on other front they loing ground. So why they asking for wapons. Well because they want to retake their country. which is only possible with artillery. But ukraine is far from losing. and if the russians take over ukraine, they will find themself in the biggest insurection war, since afgahnistan. One way or another, this war will end in a failiure for russia.
    1
  997.  @jeansansterre6908  droped dramaticly. Andthe precicion is very poor. Or the russians aim on civilian and cultural areas on purpose. Any way in the first mounth they shot about 800 to 1000 missles. Now they are at about 60 to 80 a mounth. There is a reason why they now heavely relly on sovjet era artillery.
    1
  998.  @geoffrey9888  alraight. What you seem not to know is what those missles are 😉. The overwelming majority of Irans missles are short range (so less than 100km) ones with poor precision. The Long range and precicion arsenal of iran is estemated to about 800 to 1000. If you Talk about missles you propably Talk about cruise missles. Especialy kalibr. Those aß we now know require Western technology which is blocked now so no more production. USA is quiete clear with their numbers and right now they have about 3000 of the equivalent tomohawk. Russia has a much weaker economy and less money to produce. So asume a bit less that. Russia cannot waste all of it in this war. They need a stockpile of them for future conflict. They running out.
    1
  999. Ah any source for that. And even if. A few dozen of them dont make a huge difference
    1
  1000.  @mbtenjoyer9487  yes and they failed. Ukraines airdefence is still working. No air dominance after over a year and a still functunal ukrainian army. America got iraq on its knees in less then a mounth. Pathetic
    1
  1001. No they dont. They once in a mounth launch a wave mostly consisting of iranian drones. In the beginning they fired dozens a day
    1
  1002. Missles are more complex than bombs. So why is russia Not using more of them If they have a Lot of them.
    1
  1003. A very expansive one
    1
  1004.  @zykom1  they should have captured the entire country by now
    1
  1005. Yeah and where whipped out after one day
    1
  1006. OK Troll
    1
  1007. And holded it for how long before cut into pieces one day 2 days?
    1
  1008.  @johnsch1988  its funny because this was unvovered after Like 3 days. And seems to be the only Thing you guys can name.
    1
  1009. Jeah losing 20.000 to 30.000 troops in three months over thousand tanks and hundreds of aircraft. Making 3 km per day and losing the entire north to ukrain. This is a poor performance anyway.
    1
  1010. So how is counting tank in storage and give the numbers lieing.?
    1
  1011.  @NationZed  and they used to launch dozens a day. Meaning their Stocks are dry and they have to use what they csn produce
    1
  1012.  @NationZed  what is this supposed to mean Your comment doesnt mske sensd
    1
  1013.  @slooob23  what is lied here. 1000 t80s disapeared. There is not much to argue
    1
  1014.  @slooob23  what is it with you guys only asume extremes. No ukrsine is far from winning. But so is russia. Both sides suffer heavily.
    1
  1015.  @Silver_Prussian  sure thing mate. But neverless russia draus massive numbers of tanks from their storage. You dont do that just for fun. Russia lost insane amounts of equipment. Yet their breakthrough is still to come
    1
  1016.  @slooob23  is that supposed to be something meningfull kiddo
    1
  1017.  @Silver_Prussian  what crucial i Formation is missing and how is satalite images misleading
    1
  1018. He just counted boy. And yes russia is out of shells. Thstbisnwhy they have to buy from north korea. Yes they where out of missles. That is why they only fire like once a mounth. Nobody claimed they are out of drones
    1
  1019. Well they did run out. Now they stepped up production and have New ones. That easy mate
    1
  1020. What is propaganda here
    1
  1021. Well. They dont.
    1
  1022. Du hast also keine Ahnung von diesen Abrüstungsabkommen stimmts?
    1
  1023. ​ @bigvaxmeanie925 looks at the account. 1 year old russian troll account
    1
  1024. 😂😂😂 Trolls make up better and better numbers. Why are you so dumb.
    1
  1025. But it will run low on certain old tank types
    1
  1026. How does it change the fact that those tanks disapeared
    1
  1027. Why not. We see the numbers dwindle and russia using older tanks
    1
  1028. This is about t80s my friend t72s are irrelevant
    1
  1029. This number comes from the russian government so its bullshit
    1
  1030. Yes cause they pulled out a lot of stuff and lost even more.
    1
  1031.  @Silver_Prussian  well nobody who actually had a clue said this in 2022 and 2023. But your complaint is meaningless. The actuall numbers visible are just simple facts. Yes they had a shit Tone of tanks. Now not anymore
    1
  1032. Well nobody say the run out by now. But they are dragging out the last reserves from storage
    1
  1033.  @opiapr  and indeed they where russing out of missles. After a few mounths, missle launches droped dramatisch and now they are barly used. Russia can only fire what they produce. The Stocks seem to be depleted
    1
  1034.  @opiapr  Same content. Nobody claimed in 2022 russia would run out of tanks any time soon.
    1
  1035. Nope. Nobody said 2 years ago that russia is out of tanks
    1
  1036. What makes you think pakistan is selling its tanks
    1
  1037. Satalite images
    1
  1038. What about Amerika and tanks
    1
  1039. Nope He just counted
    1
  1040. What is propaganda here
    1
  1041. What are you talking about?
    1
  1042. Those numbers are propably way to high. And we cant prove it
    1
  1043. I was in Washington in 2015. It was britain
    1
  1044.  @mv69969  you can by fresh satalite pictures and indeed count. That is what many intellegence agencies do as well
    1
  1045. More then russia has MLRS apperently
    1
  1046.  @Howardlifts  So you dont have evidence and just made it up. Thats what I thought. The for the answer. Feel debunked....
    1
  1047.  @Howardlifts  evidence? Trust me bro...
    1
  1048. ​ @Howardlifts did russia suddely build buildings for tens of thousands of vehicles. I dont think so
    1
  1049. Conclusion. Russia already pulled over half of its Reserven out of storage. And the remaining have many not functioning in it.
    1
  1050.  @nameless7699  your first sentence was dumb btw. In a 1 v. 1 quality always wins. And ask the over a million man strong iraqy army how they stood against roughly 150.000 coalition troops.
    1
  1051.  @nameless7699  lets begin with the fact that russias 90% of artillery is sovjet era types. Those simple lack range and accuracy. The western did as well. There just was nothing better. Now western artillery Systems are send. POLISH CRAP, german p2000 and american M777, With target circles with less then 5 m. This is unreachable for cold war era artillery. Furthere more. Russians dont have the same intellegence capabilities. Their soy satalites are useless, you get better footsge on Google maps, their drones are Limits to 10 km in the frontline. Against this ukrsine has real time imiging of dozens of american spy satalites. Gues what works.
    1
  1052. Well western artillery is much more accurate. Also artillery is a very ineffective method. Nato uses air suprimacy to a great effect. Much cheaper and quciker
    1
  1053. And that is excactly what He said. Watch the entire Video kid
    1
  1054. This is wrong in so many levels. Lockheed Martin alone employs over a 100.000 people
    1
  1055. Well because it is hard to say
    1
  1056. ​ @evilleader1991 and they where. They fire on average 25 missles a mounth. Meaning they rely on their production
    1
  1057. Nope my little liar nobody said that ever😂
    1
  1058. What is wrong about counting😂
    1
  1059. Ahm counting things is very much facts
    1
  1060. Dont forget that many destroid artillery guns cannot be confirmed cause nobody is there to take a picture. Also most of this artillery is very old. Meaning you have to Script them for parts
    1
  1061. Problem is russia has poor accuracy and even poorer intellegence agencies. Yes they can fire thousands of shells but they dont know where to and how to aim
    1
  1062. Oh btw. America produces 80.000 shells per mounth. Not years
    1
  1063. How did you came up with these numbers. Did you had the change to look into factory manuels or what
    1
  1064.  @clarkbutler  it is not about spoons kid. If you are claiming things you must be ready to defend thst opinion with evidence. Otherwise you are just another boy claiming Santa is comming
    1
  1065. Sure so that is why they sending 70 year old tanks to ukraine😂
    1
  1066. No they dont Show that. You didnt read them right
    1
  1067. Not propaganda but counting of aatalite imigas
    1
  1068. He never claimed russia is running out of artillery. You dont waschen the video fool
    1
  1069.  @kylerusso3237  Sure so that is the reason why russia doesnt make any progress and in fact loses teritory
    1
  1070. Like ukraine soon was defeated last year 😂
    1
  1071. Thing is. A PZH2000 has unbelievable accuracy and range. You easely can Knochen out a dozen enemy positions and disapear
    1
  1072. Ahm yes. Almost every. All He did was counting That is it
    1
  1073. ​ @yap5995 kid. How csn people like you lie about reality 180°. Russia attacked ukraine. Twice
    1
  1074.  @apollobad1105  So Nato produces now around 4 million a year. Accourding to you russia wouöd produce 28 million shells. Dont be so stupid plese
    1
  1075. They rely on Iran, China north korea and recently asced egypt for ammo
    1
  1076. ​ @DreamyCheshire-up9rf russia faces interest rates of over 12% while their inflation cut the rubles value in half in less then 2 years. Russia feels the sanctions hard but they take time to work. Even worse. Russia will spend half its anual budget on military spending next year. Meaning public services, infrastructure and long term investments will suffer. Already they facing a workforce shortage not seen since 1995. No matter how the war ends, russias future looks dark.
    1
  1077. 50 years of production in the sovjet union
    1
  1078.  @iLoveThoseVids  I did. Nobody ever claimed russia would run out of shells. They csnt cause they produce some. But what people do say and what we see, is that russia increasingly uses very old ammo and decreased massivly their shelling. We saw hundreds of Videos of complaining soldiers lacking shells. Meaning they have some problems, one way or another. If it is logistics or actuall stockpiles, nobody knows
    1
  1079. Nobody said they would run out of shells.
    1
  1080. Nope
    1
  1081. You didnt even watched it right?
    1
  1082. And nobody said they will run out, any time soon. But the stocks seem to shrink
    1
  1083.  @badwolf66  russia itself admited that is shrunk by 2%. The ruble is at its 10 year bottom. Passed one cent per 100 rubbles and still shrinking. The russian economy is suffering cause of lack of workers. Western sanctions do work. Bit economicsl sanctions always take time. Also russia found a few was around it for example using third countries to do so
    1
  1084. They maybe could. But dont forget, that takes time, and costs money. Money russia does not have
    1
  1085. He never said US is out of artillery. The Cluster ammo is just for a different purpose
    1
  1086.  @nekko5778  i did. But sperently we came to different conclusion. Dont get me wrong. There is no excact number of lost equipment. For example not for everything is a picture available. But we get a good idea. And now you. What makes you think oryx is shit.
    1
  1087. Actually not. They provide evidence for every single count. You just dont like it because it breaks your narative
    1
  1088.  @ZuluMaximillian  you said russia has a very good i militsry Industrie. And I countered with evidence thst impleies otherwise. Easy.
    1
  1089. All He did was counting. What is your problem. This military complex wasnt able to produce more than 20 highly promoted t14 in 9 years
    1
  1090. But it is Ukraine vs Russia. IF Nato would actually enter the war russia would be pushed out in weeks
    1
  1091. Jesus they did. The storages are empty. So they only fire what they produce or buy from north korea
    1
  1092. Well eventually they will. Question is, can ukraine stay strong long enough
    1
  1093. No kid they did not confirmed that. Alos as usual you forget the to elections since
    1
  1094. ​​ @rhysnichols8608 anukowitch was voted out by his own Party people just were sick of oligarchs selling their future to russia
    1
  1095.  @andersbergman457  😅😅😅 rule number one for Aggressors. If you want to attack, say you just d3fend yourself. So an invasion force now ey. Wow so you believe the ukraine army. Pre war 200.000 men would attack russia. Russia 1 million troops 5x more tanks, aircraft and vehicles. And remember NUKES. Wow if you actually dived down that deep into the kremlins propaganda, nobody can help you.
    1
  1096. Ukraine was never a threat. Remember nukes
    1
  1097. Sure. Trump basicly bend the knee in front of putin and his party is the one trying to stop support for ukraine. But Sure the democrats are to blame.
    1
  1098. No they havent. In the beginning they outnumbered everything ukraine had. Still they fsiled
    1
  1099. Not realy no. They Lack of modern tanks, precission missles and ammo. They have to mobilise thousands of people and use prisionors
    1
  1100. The russians didnt took this negotiations seriosly from the beginning. Also putin always wanted to take Ukraine. One way PR another
    1
  1101. Well technicly they did. In the second offensive against mariopol a entire russian tank vompany took part
    1
  1102. Russia never saw Minsk as a working treaty. The seperatists and their russian colaborstors broke ceasfire after ceasefire. They needed a reason to invade
    1
  1103. Well because russia is governed by sovjet era fossils
    1
  1104. Kid putin doesnt ask his parliament anything. Cherson is majority ukrainian still they annaxed it. Now bombing it. Putin claimed for decades ukraine to be a part of russia, so yes it was his goal
    1
  1105. So you think it is good for a president to ignore International law and Split a country regardless of what the people think. Nixe one
    1
  1106. What is this quote supposed to mean. 😂 Yes when russia is gone, there will be peace in ukraine finaly
    1
  1107.  @GoonyMclinux  Well they didnt skiped that. After russias first invasion, they invested heavy and reformed. And it showed. Especialy in the first mounths. Now with additional help they maybe are able to through the russians out for good
    1
  1108.  @GoonyMclinux  2.7 billion is actually nothing. Over 8 years that is barly enough to sustain a tank batalion
    1
  1109.  @GoonyMclinux  Well it shows that a bit of training and a few anti tank wapons is enough to hold the mighty russian army
    1
  1110.  @GoonyMclinux  yeah what wapons excsctly. You know that. Dont worry if you didnt got in in one hour I tell you. And little hint. It wasnt much
    1
  1111. You dont even know what they recieved before 2022 do you
    1
  1112.  @LokeshYadav-cv9nw  the amount of people going left or right, doesnt change the fact that russia started the war kid. Them and their henchman. Man, of the people feared to be in one of the Co flirt psrties so they choose to go in the neoigbor country where they speak their language. And now russia made 12 million people flee their homes. Is responsible for the wordt flood in decades and killed IP to half a million people. Nice work kid.
    1
  1113. ​ @LokeshYadav-cv9nw aha so how many russians are safe by the Ork army
    1
  1114.  @UnaliverOfChildren  its called cope kid
    1
  1115.  @blastorange2460  you are not aware of cherson kiev and khrakiv apperently.
    1
  1116. Lawrow, the prime Minister? 😂😂😂. Shows how little you know...
    1
  1117.  @danielmlinar4892  incorrect. They asked pakistan for equipment cause they have plwnty sovjet type stuff. And yes Nato uses less artillery cause we rely more on airpower then artillery. Also its weird, russia always complains that we are threatening them with Nato while they brag about how good they are in Arms production.
    1
  1118. Nowdays they weld stets on 60 year old tanks
    1
  1119.  @danielmlinar4892  actually it aged perfectly. The russians still dont dare to attack from the north, while they lose insane amounts of stuff for a few km in the east
    1
  1120.  @bomjahed  Trust me bro. Stepsister husbands best friend works in the kremlin.
    1
  1121. Is russia making anything substantial
    1
  1122. How is sevastopol doing 😂
    1
  1123. You got no evidence for that claim, so bullshit. Also even if. Those airfields are protected by airdefence, which shout be able to shot that stuff down
    1
  1124. Yes
    1
  1125.  @adamesd3699  we talk about egypt here mates
    1
  1126.  @lordsheogorath3377  nope iran doesnt have nukes. Not yet anyway. But we dont talk about iran. We talk about egypt
    1
  1127. Pathetic
    1
  1128. Russia for 3 mounths now is shelling everything in ukraine with missles and drones. The very idea from you guys that russia is holding back is laughable. This war is expensive. It costs billions and thousands of lives every week. It would be in russians interrest to end it as quick as possible. But they just csnt
    1
  1129. The russians know why they doing it.
    1
  1130. They have satalite imiges
    1
  1131. Because they have plenty of Airbases around the World with refuling capability
    1
  1132. Because the System is half the truth. The best system in the world, is useless if the personal is bad. It may Sound trivial but imagine. You sit there for mounths and years, while nothing happens, then in an instant, you have a few seconds to decide to shot down incomming air targets
    1
  1133. No they cannot. Patriot doesnt have a ground mode and the reach is lower than 300 km
    1
  1134. We have Winter here right now. They fixed the street down the city in days. That is waste of ammo
    1
  1135. You are a fan of varias tinfoil channels ha?
    1
  1136. Russia claimes to had 2000 to 3000 tanks active before the war. We can assume that the majority is destroyed. Take the 1500 and add some dozens or hundred and you get close
    1
  1137. Dewtroyed yes
    1
  1138. ​ @Cba409 take a english class kid, you need it. And after that a class for politics, teaching you to dont believe the claims of a dictator
    1
  1139.  @Cba409  is this supposed to mean something? Or is the Translation brocken in St Petersburg
    1
  1140. Actually not. And most are ancient
    1
  1141. Well only if you believe those numbers. But you are a joke so you just take These numbers for granted
    1
  1142. Keep telling yourself that.
    1
  1143. Sure. That is why they bringing t55s now
    1
  1144. The Main force consisted of t72s
    1
  1145. He tslked about the buildings
    1
  1146. Nope they have about 5000 to 7000. And russia is not winning
    1
  1147. Pathetic
    1
  1148. Well because they dont. Most were just outside in the rain. That is a junk Yard. Not a storage base😊
    1
  1149. The exonomy was never high and yesh the russian population is very poor
    1
  1150. He already includes this
    1
  1151.  @Alien_isolationist  why would you like to watch a Media that is completly under controll of the russian government. It is basicly apropaganda outlet by Design like fox news, info wars or MNSBC. But from a hostile country. Why should we give putin more power than ge already has
    1
  1152.  @Alien_isolationist  you are aware that RT is arussian state controlled Media outlet. It is 100% submissive to the kremlin.
    1
  1153. Difficult to say, they were paid by the sovjet russian empire
    1
  1154. Your believe doesnt matter. Pictures dont lie
    1
  1155. He included the Hangar. And there are no underground facilities
    1
  1156. Well that is what putler says
    1
  1157. The 50 T90 is refering to the ones in storage. All others are in Service. But I gues you can provide reliable sources fir your numbers😅
    1
  1158. ​ @CsehCsaba oh I forgot russia won against Japan in 1907. Or ww1 or the Finnland or the first chechen war. Wow russia actually lost more thsn it won😂
    1
  1159. ​ @CsehCsaba Well yes He knows. Kinda. He locker from above and counted. And having raw a materials is no Indikator for having many tanks. If they have so many of them. Why are they bringing t55s now😂
    1
  1160. Maybe if he would be russian. But he is not so he is free to show authentic data
    1
  1161. Wrong They used multiple t90Ms some are destroyed. One is already in america.
    1
  1162. Their Names are Stijn Mitzer and Joost Oliemans. Both are born and raised in netherlands. Stop talking bullshit
    1
  1163. Not realy. If a tank is explorer or burned out its not possible anymore
    1
  1164. Well He never said that. But lieing is the russian spirit isnt it
    1
  1165.  @Alienisolati0nist  the reason why russia is not retreating is the intensive minefield and artillery they layed in winter. So you have no hard proof. Only a budget proposal for 2024 and the word of a corrupt oligarch. That is beyonf ignorant 🤣
    1
  1166.  @Alienisolati0nist  you know its funny. You take anything that guy says, and claim its true. Why. Why should anybody take serios what he says. Russia claimed to have over 2000 t14 by now. They have less then 20. So what evidence do you have this is true? You dont have any.
    1
  1167.  @Alienisolati0nist  oh realy. So where did you get that number from 😘
    1
  1168.  @Alienisolati0nist  Well the 4.8k is crap. Ukraine performs propaganda as well of course. But oryx has actuall evidence. Talking about 2.5k tank losses. And yes russia is running low. That is why they now send 70 years old t54s and even older ones. Why did they not run out yet. Well cause they inharited the sovjet army, hording every piece of junk they had. Meaning while ukraine gets more modern russia increasinlgy old stuff
    1
  1169. On the battlefield
    1
  1170. Of course not
    1
  1171. Well, this Story could be just pure bs, but fine lets asume it is true. If you would "find" tanks out in the siberian tiga, they would have been their for years, out in the open, exposed to the elements and Not checked on. Meaning they are in very bad shape, and require massive repairs
    1
  1172. Well He explained
    1
  1173. Problem is. Those tanks are rusty, weak and hard to use. Like my old csr they could break down after a few KM
    1
  1174. Do you want him to get burne out
    1
  1175. Nope it comes from satalite images
    1
  1176.  @LemiBL  nope not yet. But russia is at is weakest in dekades. The problem is both sides are los on equipment and proffesional personal
    1
  1177.  @LemiBL  and turnes out, most the times they were right. almost no missles, lack of competent soildiers, lack of tanks, and poor leadership.
    1
  1178. The showel report was one unit in one area fought by wagner. And yes it is passable, if a soildier runs out of his ammo which happens quickly and if He is shot at retreat He will use anything He has.
    1
  1179. ​ @andreasfahlen4936  in fact. Oryx proved by picture and other footage at least 2000 destroyed ones.
    1
  1180. Nobody said that. But the 1500 tanks moved. porpably replaced destroyed ones
    1
  1181. Junkyard
    1
  1182.  @cliffbird5016  funmy Story kid. Unfortunatly for you the M1A1 uses a licenced Canon barrel from german Rheinmetall AG. The same Gun Leopard 2 uses. Why is that important. Well I used to be a driver of Leo 2 during my military service. In the early 2000s. We had some t64 and t62 left over from east germany, we used them as targets. One of my Platon mates performed a shot at 2600m. Projectile went right through the tank. So your claim is just bullshit. I dont know about your other fancy stories. After a quick Google search I couldnt confirm one of them. And btw. It doesnt matter what happened to ww2 when talking about todays tanks. To claim a 70 year old tank Model is supierior to any modern western wapon is laughable. In the 70s even the 25 mm of bradleys was able to penetrate t55 hulls in vietnam. It will be fun to watch the sovjet junk turned into scrapmetal soon.
    1
  1183. He included buildings. Your 100k claim is pure ignorance, given then russia claimed themself to only have 10.000
    1
  1184. So after many asulting, do you have any evidence or Argument 😂
    1
  1185. False. He said there are only 50 in storage. Meaning the other ones are in active units. But what to expect frim a guy believing in russias claims
    1
  1186. You dont seem to know how modern military Industrie works
    1
  1187. Aperently not
    1
  1188. Russia couldnt even seize bakhmut yet. And why the heck are you threatening us with nukes. We didnt do anything to you. You started the war
    1
  1189. And if they have such an giant army of tanks. Why are they not just roll over ukraine and end the war
    1
  1190. With ex amry guy you mean either mcgreagor or Ritter. Both are pro kremlin puppets spreading fake news and propaganda
    1
  1191. Did putler told you that number.😂
    1
  1192. Russi is wesk yes. But even the weakest puppy in the world if possessing nukes is not attacked. Nato could push them out of ukraine in a mounth. But that would triggern nuclear war
    1
  1193.  @AnimeGamingNoob0205  so your three year old son knows more about analyse, argumentation and research than you? Just like I do? Wow you must be the father of the year, educating him that much.
    1
  1194.  @AnimeGamingNoob0205  yeah but if you asume something, that has no backup evidence, you just making shit up, fooling others to believe you, rather than in facts.
    1
  1195.  @AnimeGamingNoob0205  So your only arguments is, there are underground parking lots, so must have those for tanks as well. So you are the one who is asuming here soemting you have no evidence for what so ever. Also in no former warsaw pact state we see something like that, no show of force by showing this massive garages for propaganda purpose, no considering of the imense weight of tanks. Just a kid, talking about things he doesnt have any clue about.
    1
  1196. Do you. Well good thing you have bo proof for their existance
    1
  1197. Not if they are profen by picture
    1
  1198. I would call it bullshit. Unprofen claim and misleading. A few thousand tanks couldnt spark a chip shortage
    1
  1199. ​ @MrShbbz and btw. He didnt just counted on some bases but looked at all bases
    1
  1200. ​ @MrShbbz so I gues you have evidence for that 95% claim. Or is it just russian fanboyism. Russia themself claim to only have 12.000 tanks. That is 1/5 of the Red army. Just vaining about the big russian roaring bear doesnt make him so.
    1
  1201. Ahm. Not certain to the last tank. But by counting them by satalite you get a very good idea. You can point out where He was wrong if you like. But just shouting around how great the mighty russian army is, doesnt make it true.
    1
  1202. Ahm yes. He caunted them
    1
  1203. Sure 4 weeks old russian troll
    1
  1204. Hard to tell. Propably they lost at least half their force and those remsining get increasingly harter to maintain. In the end we only csn gues
    1
  1205. Terminator uses T90 hulls. You are a joke
    1
  1206. Oh yes they do. If the government or corrupt sells them or if they beoke down
    1
  1207.  @nurgozhin  one more thing. Tank production isnt the game changer it used to be. Tanks are expansive, logistical intensive Tools, which are esaly are destroyed by a anti tank missle worth a fraction of the cost.
    1
  1208.  @nurgozhin  some problems with that. First it is a russian propaganda channel. I saw this one before. They dont even say war. Second I only count 22 T90s Third. We dont know where this is, no factories, no buildings. Nothing. Ans as I said. Those ones could have been produced in a mounth a week or a day. We simply dont know. Conclusion: This picture doesnt prove anything. We know that russia pulls out 70 years old tanks, but still have many new ones in production? D fuck. And still we dont see ukrainian positions swarmed with fleets of New tanks. Sorry man. I am not convinced
    1
  1209.  @nurgozhin  you need Media competence man. So you got a picture with 25 T90Ms. What is their evidence for the production time. Remember. Russia is a country which painted new letters on nukes and vehicles, so they csn Show more at parades
    1
  1210.  @nurgozhin  any soirce for that? Also if true, why they pulling 70 year old tanks from Depots.
    1
  1211. So they say
    1
  1212.  @danielmlinar4892  no I answered your question how the russian losses possibly can be so high. About oryx. Well first they came realy close to the losses of the syrian regime and turkish vehicles in their invasion of the kurdish areas. Also the numbers they pulled out of storage ad somehow up with thwir losses accourding to oryx. Your only Argument is, naha it cannot be that russia performs badly. Because russia strong. Isnt it
    1
  1213. ​ @danielmlinar4892  so why are the russian losses so high. Well doctrine and tactic. In the beginning of the war, the ukrainians laid hundreds of ambushes with modern ATGMs artillery and drones. Also they have such bad logistics that they ran out of fuel many times. Same thing in the counteroffensive.
    1
  1214. 1. Oryx is quiet accurate. It was in turkey and in syria. You have no reason to deny its credebility. Also the numbers are propably higher. 2. He counts in possibletanks in garages. 3. They produce around 20 a mounth. Not a big impact
    1
  1215. Nice one. Any proof for that claim. Or is it the same like russia has some superwapons left
    1
  1216. Sure kid. Accourding to who?
    1
  1217.  @asdnetwork4268  holding for 8 1/2 mounths now against the second best army in ukraine. But as long as you can throw criminals into the meatgrinder everything good right?
    1
  1218. If so why are they pulling t55s
    1
  1219. ​ @Boris-do5rs I am german. And we are not in for russia kiddo. The bible says nothing about anything in modern time😂
    1
  1220.  @Boris-do5rs  it is not a amazing coincidence. Like 80 nations have some form of eagles or lions as their national animal Symbol. And of course you forget that ukraine is fighting russia not UK or Amerika right.
    1
  1221. A book from two thousand years ago mentiones a bear killing somebody. Conclusion russia 😂😂😂. Cope harder kid
    1
  1222. The US operates intercontinental ballistic missles aince the 50s. To think they cant build that, is silly. But the truth is, they are just not as valuable as they seem. And btw. Neither russia nor Iran has hypersonic missles
    1
  1223. Neptun
    1
  1224.  @oggaBugga  the one wjo didnt lost his country to russia
    1
  1225. They are literly unablässig to make any progress and loosing men and vehicles like flies.
    1
  1226. 500k? Did you counted that yourself😂
    1
  1227. Russia cant even handle ukraine with 5% of natos busget
    1
  1228. Not realy but they destroy an insne mount of russian tanks
    1
  1229. ​ @Mortablunt nope kid. Visualy verified losses
    1
  1230. Yap .less rain and snow
    1
  1231. Nobody says russia is loosing bit they Lose a lot of equipment
    1
  1232. Why calling them Ukies like a snarky teenager
    1
  1233.  @the.parks.of.no.return  no Crew.🤣. The bullshit never ends
    1
  1234. Anotger bullshit number from a bullshit poster
    1
  1235.  @harrypeters6870  so you have evidence? Accourding to your confidence you must have😘
    1
  1236. Satalite images are one of the bwst evidence out their kid
    1
  1237.  @MrMatmulan  yes mate. That Was literly my point. They run out themself and need foraign help. And why north korea. China, india or Brasilien could help out right. As far as I heard BRICS is United more than ever.
    1
  1238. Did they? So far the russians get slaightered
    1
  1239. Well the russian shelling droped dramaticly, no major waves of missles anymore and they ask north korea for ammo. Seems right
    1
  1240. Well every country with open Media would already rebelled afainst this high losses for a useless war. But ruSia is a dictstorship wherr there is no free press
    1
  1241. You copied your comment and posted it rwice little troll account. You guys are pathetic.
    1
  1242. No but the pictures are
    1
  1243. ​ @Hack_es the current production rate of russia is unknown. And dont claim you know. If russia actually could produce so many tanks they would not need to bring back dozens of different old tank types
    1
  1244.  @MA-hn9vo  nope. Oryx counted at least 60 t55s in russian forces got destroyed. Also why do you think they move hundreds of them around all over the country? For good sports
    1
  1245. Because they lost much more than that. They lost a minimum of 2.5k tanks. More is likley. They cant keep up so they have to bring back much more in the next mounths
    1
  1246. Well they dont make that many tanks
    1
  1247. Well missles kinda yes. Tanks? Nobody said So.
    1
  1248.  @schutzanzug4518  yes a Lamborghini has a very delicate and expansive engine. And a tank has a much more powerfull engine. Around 1200 HP. So a tank has a more powerfull engine than a Lamborghini. Lets face facts mate. A tank is a very expansive very complex and very difficult to build machine. You cant just say scrao Metall and expect them to build a new tank
    1
  1249.  @schutzanzug4518  2016 one t90M was about 4.5 million. Gues how high it is now. With inflation and Bad economy in place. My bet is on 6
    1
  1250.  @schutzanzug4518  it is a very accurate. A tank costs between 3 to 12 million dollars. Its a very complex machine with hundreds of tgousands of parts. Creating the hull out of scrap Metall is like 10 percent of the work.
    1
  1251.  @schutzanzug4518  actually it is. A rank is a very expansive higly complicszed machine. It is mich more then a hull, engine and cannon.
    1
  1252. Well all together around 8000. But scattered over three continents and in many milaries.
    1
  1253. Well depends what we talk about. Cruise missles. Yes. They didnt fired a wave in multiple mounths. They likely safe those few left for the winter and tried to build a few. Artillery shells. Yes. They would not ask north korea for help if they would hsve plenty left. Tanks they storage gets lower and lower. And so it is for other vehicles. But they have plenty older but less capable gear. The queszion is not if they will run out. Technicly they never will. But how much can you lose until your countries security and power projections gets in danger.
    1
  1254. Ahm no. They where able to withatand the largest landforce on earth for almost 2 years. With 5 percdnt of Nato budget
    1