Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Where Is Russia's Air Force? Shouldn't it be Dominating?" video.

  1. What did we actually learned. Motivated people on the ground, and 2 % of Nato budget is enough to push back mighty russia
    7
  2. And they lied. They destroyed basicly every City in their occupied areas. And of course you are submitted to their propaganda aperatus living there
    5
  3. Ah so their fighter jets launching from parking lots ha?
    4
  4. Russia still doesnt have air superiority. They csnt bomb cities. And still ukrines airforce and airdefence is working. Cope your copebubble
    4
  5. They anihilated mariopol, bachmut and other cities. They shelled them with artillery, and used phosphor and cluster bombs in cities. Russia doesnt care about civilians.
    4
  6. No they do not have them. Every plane is listed and also known to intelegence services
    4
  7. Yeah yeah. Religios cults always promiss u doomsday. Still waiting for it
    4
  8. What is this comparison supposedto mean. Speed of aircraft is almost irelevant. What matters is acuracy, communication, tactics and morale. Yes the russianshave hypersonic wapons. Those are just realy fast bombs, which are Hard to shot down. As soon as they hit, they are just another 500 kg bomb. Also they are dozens of times more expansive, Meaning you cant produce them in masses. Whst matters is how much material you can Put on the Ground a few thousand advanced anti tank wapons can have a mich larger impact than the entire arsenal of hypersonic wapons
    4
  9. Yeah it is. Most their planes are older than 30 years
    4
  10. Pro russian fashist propaganda. Truth watch: covert cabal
    4
  11. But for some reason they cant shot down a drone on a trail of 600 km
    3
  12. Iraq had one of the tightest air defence network on earth in 1990. But theougj texhnical supremicy they overwhelmed it
    3
  13.  @hollywood5274  nice one kid. Whi invaded crimea in 2014. Who send wapons and mercenaries into donbass. Who invaded in 2022. Sorry kid but nobody takes you serios if you claim such dumb stuff
    3
  14. Well they dont. Because we dont want ww3 over ukraine. And ukraine makes a quiet good job
    3
  15. At this point it should be clear that russia doesnt give a heck about civilians
    3
  16. because Iraq at that time was the 4th largedst military power of the world. Including a dense defense network. Afgahnistan was a difficult matter. In fact they were most the times defeated. But after 20 years of asymetrical war and ambushes, the willpower to stay. But through all that time, america had absolute air supieriority.
    3
  17. Yeah against rebels with some rifles and inocent civilians in ther cley homes
    3
  18. We wait for 9 mounths now
    3
  19. Achieving air superiority is the number one goal in every war. Russia didnt managed this in 2 years
    3
  20. For one simple reason. The nuclear arsenal. Without any use of nuclear warheads russia could stand a mounth against nato
    3
  21. ​ @sandeepkulkarni8163 russia used literly every wapon sthey have. All balistic and hypersonic missles, t14 tanks and even su57. All division are more or less present in ukraine. And its not enough
    2
  22. Like in Butcha. Or are dams military targets
    2
  23. Brics consists of 5 states and right now no countries Apple for membership
    2
  24. Nope most their airdefence is the s300
    2
  25. Yet. Attacks are rare, the ukrainian airdefence is still operating and russia cant bomb cities freely
    2
  26. Not realy they did not reciefed any long range airdefences.just their own s300
    2
  27. Good that you mention syria. Who bombed and completly destroyed over 10 cities in the north again, along with thousands of civilians. Yes russia
    2
  28. Starting a costly war for no reasonable goal is not smart
    2
  29. Always funny how people claim the F35 to be obsolet, while russias S57 is worse in RCS
    2
  30. Stringer than ever before. They pulling out 70 year old equipment and ask north korea for help. Wow what a strong nation 😂
    2
  31. It did. Still ukraines airdefence is active. No air supieriority is achieved.
    2
  32. Look up the definition of War instead of swallow the russian propaganda. Still ukrain airspace is protected by a good anti air system. Why didnt the airforce helped during the last days, why so they have to fly low. Because they barly can fight in ukraine.
    2
  33. And sacraficing its ground troops in the process
    2
  34. Your entire existance is
    2
  35. Because their would want to use their airforce as bombers. Ukraine has a small one but still is flying.
    2
  36. That is only partially true. The 3500 km is the totall reach you can fly under optimal conditions. But in combat you need to fly to the target 1/3, come back 1/3 and spare fuel for possible AA attacks 1/3. In totall around 1100km combat radius. Also only in ideal conditions. Flying low on sealevel, meaning thicker atmosphere the range deacreses. Meaning the 600 km is very accurate.
    2
  37. They did. They basicly used everything they have except the su57.
    2
  38. Oh did they found those 1.5 Mio. Winter uniforms yet
    2
  39. We arent
    2
  40. They using litterly all ground combat troops they have. The only reason they calling it a special military Operation is because it sounds better than war
    2
  41.  @Boris-do5rs  nope you repeat what he tells you. You can in theory see stealth better with low frequency but.but only at a certsin distance. And it lightd the Radar Station up like a christmas tree, risking getting detected by AR missles.
    1
  42.  @germansoldierman.17  Well that is not good my man. You should visit a doctor.
    1
  43.  @Boris-do5rs  1. Cause to this very moment you refuse to give any evidence for use of SU57 in ukraine 2. You ignore the varios shotdowns of very manuverable russian planes. 3. You Mix stealth with manuvrrbility. What is it now
    1
  44.  @Boris-do5rs  I am not amerikan so I dont watch amerikan news mate. Just present your proof for that 17 to one ratio. Or any proof for SU57 in Action in ukraine
    1
  45.  @Boris-do5rs  those drones have 600 km plus reach. So you dont have any evidence for wctive use of Su57, you also refuse to provide evidence for this 17 to 1 claime. You are thereofore just a confused russian fanboy. Fait enough. Took you long enough
    1
  46.  @Boris-do5rs  you made the claim. Meaning unless you just made it up, you must have red it somewhere. So where was that
    1
  47.  @Boris-do5rs  ok again. Where is this 17 to zero comming from
    1
  48.  @Boris-do5rs  And accourding to you russia has a very great success with SU57. Something you still refuse to provide evidence for. So accourding to you russian stealth is great, while amerikan stealth is obsolet. Wtf
    1
  49.  @Boris-do5rs  they cant in fact not. They can see a bit better with low frequency. But only so much. A b21 100 km away is invisible regardless.
    1
  50.  @Boris-do5rs  no Radar can see over the horizon, that is not how light works. That is why russia and Amerika have early waring Radar planes. You know literly nothing kid
    1
  51.  @Boris-do5rs  lets make a deal. You finally tell me where this 17 to one ratio is comming from and I give you my source ;)
    1
  52. What a silly liar you are
    1
  53.  @Boris-do5rs  Is that so. Accourding to who?
    1
  54.  @Boris-do5rs  And again if apperently in your world the stealth Features of the SU57 work good enough. Therefore the F35 is not obsolete. In fact its the opposite
    1
  55. So why they dont just bomb kiew with bombers
    1
  56.  @Boris-do5rs  the Su35 sure. We saw them in active combat since 2012. But to this day we never saw a definitive Action of the SU57.
    1
  57.  @Boris-do5rs  Oh wow. You changed your mind 180 degrees. First you claimed stealth and the F35 is obsolet. Now you claim those super dupa SU57 are invisible. Wow that went bad for you
    1
  58. Nop just numbers
    1
  59.  @Boris-do5rs  BTW every stealth plane is visible at a certain range. Its just math. RCS and distance. There is no white and Black here. There is RCS and the question how low it is. And if its low enough you can ewcape Radar. Like Amerika did in dozens of conflicts
    1
  60.  @Boris-do5rs  Ah I see. So miss spelled. You wrote SU35. So to this very day there is no confirmed use of SU57. Every single time people claime it, it was debunked. Accourding to russia itself. It has a RCS equivalent to a cruese missle. Around 0.1 sqm. And when russia claims something its much worse usually. BTW. If an awacs on Nato territory cant see somethin at the russo ukrainian border, means nothing. If its far away enough it is not detectable. If a non stealthy cruese missle flies by at 400 km, you cant see it with an awacs. You dont understand what you are talking about.
    1
  61. Yeah mariopol thanks the russians for the liberarion of their rubbel. The very fact that they couldt knock out the ukrsinian aurdefence and still get shot down is an embarresment
    1
  62.  @Boris-do5rs  we talked about how valuable stealth is. And you come up with a none stealth aircraft. What is your point
    1
  63.  @Boris-do5rs  but what on earth is this silly Story supposed to mean in the context. We talked about stealth my boy.
    1
  64. Yeah right. Except all of Mariopol is destroid. Multiple school, hospitals and Kindergardens where hit. Clusterbombs all over the place.
    1
  65. This is a conventional war with clear frontlines. There are hundreds of targets. But russia still struggles to attack them
    1
  66.  @Boris-do5rs  And once ukraine got modern AA Systems they didnt anymore. Now they use glide bombs, cause they csnt penetrate ukrainian airspace with planes, anymore.
    1
  67. Well sometimes yes. But way to few to controll the skys and bomb the UAF
    1
  68.  @Boris-do5rs  Yes If. But what is your evidence for that. And what excactly is far. 100 km 200 km
    1
  69.  @Boris-do5rs  nope its not gone. That is the reason why stealthy cruese missles are passend rusdias airdefence. That is why almost every larger nation is building stealth planes
    1
  70. Sure
    1
  71. Ah ukrainian army is killed long ago. So all the ukrainian speakimg soildiers are US Autors I gues
    1
  72.  @Srdjan93tl  actually ukraine is mostly flat farm Land. Also the desert was a huge benefit for the air defence in iraq
    1
  73. Funny they basicly say the same as covert does
    1
  74. What is the lie here?
    1
  75. Well the fact, that ukrain was literly surraunded by russia, and russia claims to have the biggest land force on earth. Yes it was likly ukraine would fall. And if incompetence wasnt so wide spread, they would have taken kiyv
    1
  76. Only about 1200 are fighter aircraft
    1
  77. They didnt. A battery consists of multiple launchers, comand Module and radar. Which are seperated by distance. So they might damaged one part the others are still working
    1
  78. Ah that is why the now have to buy wapons from north korea and Iran. Tell when they found this 1.5 Mio. Winter uniforms
    1
  79. It has been war since day war
    1
  80. Keep crying orc
    1
  81.  @jd5787  wow quiet easy to laugh sbout that claim. Clip of launching su34 a mounth ago. Channel the sun. Clearly seeing anti air missles there. Every aircraft carries anti air missles just in case even saudi arabian bombing their neighbor.
    1
  82. Shoting down russians
    1
  83.  @jd5787  since the russian retreat of kiew they barly made huge adnavces. And now they are at where they used to be 4 mounth ago, but with much less equipment, poor moral and a supirior ukrainian army in Front of them.
    1
  84. Dude they are losing. They must win this war otherwise they lose any intimidation, and capability to suppress neighboring countries. They should use almost everything.
    1
  85. So why are they buying arms grom north korea 😘
    1
  86.  @jd5787  You canot even dare to call a war a war. You are not in russia where you have to fear police comming to you for that. Just say war and the spirit of truth will come to you.
    1
  87.  @jd5787  still no proof for your 2 million claim but i take that as a point for myself.
    1
  88.  @jd5787  but what is the source for your falsch Informationen I am courioss.
    1
  89.  @jd5787  oh wow that is impresive. Except it is not true. They plan to increase the number to over a million in the next years. But this takes time and if the equipment is barly enough and funktional now, what do you think they will have when they increase their military. I mean. Even know they already reliy on t62s and 50 year old trucks and su24 aircraft.
    1
  90.  @jd5787  you clearly do not know anything. Russian army consists roughly 900.000 men. But only about 250.000 are combat troops. Take the losses wounded out and those who have to protest russian borders and you see that russia is on the Limit.
    1
  91. ​ @digitaldazzle5836 we gave them 5% of Nato budget worth of equipment. Even stronger wapons are on the way. Already russia cant hold their lines.
    1
  92. ​ @germansoldierman.17 no kid confirmed by picture. Also why is russia pulling out obsolete 70 year old tanks and asks Nortkorea for help if they do so well
    1
  93.  @Boris-do5rs  BTW. Your rambling about g forces shows that you dont have any idea how AA missles work. They dont follow you around they aim and fly in an almost straight path. All sovjet fighter jets cn perform 7 g plus turns. But it didnt help them in ukraine did id
    1