Comments by "David Himmelsbach" (@davidhimmelsbach557) on "Who to Blame? John Frost on Operation Market Garden's Failure WW2" video.

  1. @King The TERRAIN between Germany and the heights was the ONLY terrain that could support half-tracks and panzers without bogging the machines down. This was proven to all concerned when they threw StgIIIs into the fight. Most of the other routes were widely deemed to be impassible for panzers. Further, Germany proper is where the Dutch underground couldn't provide any observers. It was a blind spot. It's a pretty good bet that Bletchley Park// Engima intercepts were the ultimate source of the crazy panzer estimates. And obviously EVERY Allied general is going to lie until the day they died about said intercepts. Bletchley had a killer reputation -- many of its prior 'predictions' had been totally off the wall -- yet they panned out. Generals that dismissed them were, themselves, dismissed. The idea of 1,000 panzers would've come from Hitler raving to his western commanders that they were on the way. No doubt that Hitler was referring to the priority he was already giving to the future Ardennes offensive. Yes, he really DID intend to send 5th & 6th Panzer armies 1,000 panzers. Based on the latest German production tempos, the Allies figured that Monty's threat to the Ruhr would surely cause EVERY German panzer to be vectored against MG. And the key factories were just two-hours drive to the east. German panzer production peaked in August of 44. The Allies had no way of knowing that the tempo had turned down. It had been up every prior month through the war. By late 44 Nazi Germany was producing just about 1,000 panzers a month -- all types combined. ( That was the grand Allied assumption ) But the real threat was from half-tracks. They are MUCH more deadly to parachute troops. The main gun of a panzer is useless against paras in open country// farmland// Holland. The killing weapon is the machine gun. And half-tracks have at least one machine gun -- plus whatever the crew is packing. By late 44 that would've been a couple of MG42s plus bolt action rifles plus grenades. Yiikes!
    7
  2. @ DParry You've missed your reading assignment. 1) Grabner had crossed to the southern side of the Arnhem bridge BEFORE Frost even closed up to the northern approach. As a direct consequence, the battle was already LOST. Arnhem bridge was NEVER captured... and barely interdicted. MG can't work with Arnhem bridge in SS hands. 2) Both bridges were built with explosive charges -- hidden inside -- no-one could possibly see them -- nor remove them -- with detonation cables that ran off to their south sides. This was a COMMON feature of Big Bridges in that era. The Germans wired their Rhine bridges the exact same way. That's why the bridge at Remagen was such a shocker. It had been built strictly as a railroad bridge to support the Kaiser's armies during WWI. It was constructed in such a rush that no thought was given to building in explosive charges. At that moment (1916) the Kaiser's armies were heading west, so there was no way that a French army was seen as a risk. 3) A DUTCHMAN severed the detonation circuit at Nijmegen bridge. Stories you hear from Brits or Americans must be laughed at. They are either totally made up ( most likely ) or are things that came in their sleep. The detonation circuit and the explosives were a Dutch national defense secret. Everything about them was highly classified. The detonation cables were encased in concrete -- the usual habit for key electrical circuits even now -- and led off to bunkers right close to the bridges. The Nijmegen bunker was built into the telephone and post office complex. ( one building with a divider ) The Dutchman who cut those critical cables did so while the Americans were still floating down from the sky. I'd bet your life that he was an out-of-uniform Dutch soldier ( officer ?) who knew the lay of the land, instantly. I figure he'd have a high profile but for the fact that his kin lived on the wrong side of the lower Rhine. The SS would whack his extended family if they knew what he'd done. After the war, no-one cared, no-one believed. And to let his story out would embarrass both Britain and America, as both nations had soldiers taking credit for saving the bridge. &&& So, to keep it IDIOT simple for you: MG was DEAD, dead, dead, the second Grabner got onto the island with his recon boys. They not only screwed up Browning's and Gavin's assumptions -- they RUINED any chance for 1st Airborne to complete its mission. If 1st Airborne fails, then the whole enterprise fails. The Poles, XXX Corps, 101st Airborne, even the 82nd Airborne -- they are all irrelevant. Monty needed EVERY bridge -- and Arnhem was NEVER TAKEN. The northern approach does NOT equal taking the Arnhem bridge. Grabner & Company HAVE to be driven away from the southern end of Arnhem bridge before he drops it into the river. Lastly, the RAF never took out the German controlled ferry that was shifting additional panzers, half-tracks and whatnot onto the island straight through the battle -- every night. This means that even if Grabner didn't get there first, some other SS formation would've crossed over on the ferry and blown the 1st Airborne off of Arnhem bridge. There is absolutely NO COVER for the paras on the south side of that bridge. They'd be standing there with their peckers in their hands, for heaven's sakes. XXX Corps would be days too late. Browning's scheme was HOPELESS -- deal with it.
    4
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. @jsfbr MG was lost the INSTANT Grabner got across the Arnhem bridge. The Nijmegen bridge became irrelevant at that point. NOTHING could stop the SS from dropping the Arnhem bridge into the Rhine after Grabner got onto the island. TIK, and the other Brits, are engaged in a fantasy. They ALL operate from the view that Frost was in command of the Arnhem bridge. But, he never was. He was totally thwarted by the pill box -- and then -- later -- by the SS sitting on the south end of Arnhem bridge. What everyone has skipped past is that both bridges were wired -- from day one -- the day they were built -- to be exploded down into the rivers. This was a COMMON feature for major European bridges of the period. EVERYONE did it. It was NOT a common feature of American or British bridges. Neither nation figured on losing control of their bridges to invaders. The Germans and Dutch were obsessed with such a consideration. The detonation cables led off to bunkers on the SOUTH side of both bridges, as the Dutch figured the Germans to be the primary Threat from the very first. (History, heh) They did not figure on the Belgians or French being remotely as threatening. There NEVER was a need for the Germans to bring in explosives, cables or anything else. All that they had to do was break into the detonation bunker, and hook up a plunger. MG was RUINED as a plan the moment Browning didn't put paras on the island from the VERY FIRST. If Grabner had never crossed Arnhem bridge, Gavin's tempo would be irrelevant. BTW, the local Dutch had already sabotaged the Nijmegen detonation cables. That's why the bridge stayed put. Neither the British nor the Americans had anything to do with it. BOTH have taken credit, though. Lastly, the explosives that count CAN'T even be seen from the outside. You can't even touch them. They are inside an armored assembly. This was standard engineering practice at the time.
    2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. Gavin would've been crucified if Browning was lost. His account basically was designed to cover for Browning. Similarly, Browning's comments ( and scapegoat ) existed to cover for Monty. The TRUE reason for MG was Churchill's insistence that the Nazi V1 and V2 launch sites be captured -- yesterday. If you look at the projected capture zone its is EXACTLY the location of SS rocket launches. THIS ^^^ is the reason that Monty told all that 95% (IIRC) of their objectives had been achieved. Churchill is the reason why Ike agreed to Monty's great plan -- without running by his staff. In normal times, Ike ALWAYS ran big plans past Tedder, his right-hand man. MG got going far too far for Tedder to stop it. MOST of the blame has to go to Monty because he didn't do what he normally did. He 'unloaded' a shocking amount of the planning onto Browning. Which was a MAJOR gaff, as few commanders ever were as versed at a set-piece battle as Monty. That was his greatest strength. It's why he was an Army Group commander. The drop zones were ALL SCREWED UP. The 101st didn't need to even attempt to save the Son crossing. That task should've been 100% for XXX Corps... from the first. Then the 101 should've been dropped right between the two critical bridges. There was no FLAK there. XXX Corps should've been given hundreds of jeeps so that mounted infantry could have shot cross country. These are the kinds of things that Monty was famous for getting right. I have to blame Monty for basically being AWOL for this battle. I think he had Victory Disease.
    1
  24. 1