Comments by "Meh Pluribus Unum" (@pluribus_unum) on "Twitter agrees to sell itself to Elon Musk" video.

  1.  @mshinn13  - You not knowing how to use Google isn't my problem.
    2
  2. Elon Musk is a blood diamond born and bred fraud and malignant narcissist. He is as dedicated to free speech as Xi is. "Musk's own commitment to free speech, however, has its limits. While Musk has criticized Twitter's leadership, he has repeatedly attempted to squelch speech that could negatively impact his economic interests. Musk's history underscores the risks of giving near-complete control of one of the world's most powerful communication networks to one extremely rich individual." "According to people familiar with the matter, [Tesla] also complained to the government over what it sees as unwarranted attacks on social media, and asked Beijing to use its censorship powers to block some of the posts." "In a recent TED Talk, Musk said free speech means "someone you don’t like [is] allowed to say something you don’t like." But Musk has not acted in a way consistent with that mantra when Tesla's profits were at risk." "
    1
  3.  @danialhillmann5374  - Elon is no more principled than Jeff and happily uses slave-like labor in China. April 18, 2022 - "Tesla Inc. has restarted production at its Shanghai factory and laid out stringent measures for staff operating in the so-called closed-loop system, according to people familiar with the matter. The electric-vehicle maker will provide each worker with a sleeping bag and mattress, a memo sent to employees and viewed by Bloomberg shows. Given there isn’t any purpose-built dorm, people will be required to sleep on the floor in a designated area and there will be other spaces allocated for showering, entertainment (both yet-to-be completed) and catering, the memo shows."
    1
  4.  @danialhillmann5374  btw, Jeff .doesn't own the New York Times, get your facts straight.
    1
  5. Like Elon? "According to people familiar with the matter, [Tesla] also complained to the government over what it sees as unwarranted attacks on social media, and asked Beijing to use its censorship powers to block some of the posts." "In a recent TED Talk, Musk said free speech means "someone you don’t like [is] allowed to say something you don’t like." But Musk has not acted in a way consistent with that mantra when Tesla's profits were at risk."
    1
  6.  @isaachunt7107  - The Constitution has nothing to do with it, and Elon bought Twitter for profit and power, not "freedumb". "To be clear, no one has a legal right to tweet—that is, to post on Twitter, a platform owned by a private company. And Elon Musk is no pro-speech absolutist. He reportedly fires Tesla employees who disagree with him and recently fired an employee who posted a candid review of Tesla’s autonomous driving system on his YouTube channel. Musk’s interest in taking over Twitter has more to do with exerting control over his favorite playground than it does with promoting free speech."
    1
  7.  @charlesvan13  - "impossible to list" is mighty convenient for someone with no citations or evidence.
    1
  8.  @charlesvan13  - You've ascribed things to CNN that didn't happen, overlooked all corrections issued (a practice FOXNews viewers are understandably unfamiliar with), and are citing disinformation as fact. In other words, over 80% of your claims are bullshit.
    1
  9.  @charlesvan13  - The indictment was one and for lying to the FBI¹, not about Alfa Bank claims being somehow illegal, which they weren't. The lawsuit[s] I think you might be referring to [are]n't an indictment, as [they're] by Alfa Bank, not the Federal government. That lawsuit is about how information was obtained². ___________________________________________ ¹ "In September, special counsel John Durham indicted Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to Democrats, on charges that he lied to the FBI in 2016 about who his client was when he brought the bureau information about the Alfa Bank computer allegations. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty." ² "... pair of lawsuits...which doesn’t directly dispute the information collected by the researchers. Rather, it claims that the data they found was the result of a “highly sophisticated cyberattacks against it in 2016 and 2017” intended “to fabricate apparent communications” between Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization."
    1
  10.  @charlesvan13  - What I claim is you are misinformed or disinformed. Putin aided Trump in 2016¹ and 2020², including numerous instances of coordination, including asking for Russia to hack presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on live television. ________________________________________________ ¹ "Tuesday’s bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump’s years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a “hoax,” driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy." "The intelligence community’s initial January 2017 assessment of Moscow’s influence campaign included “specific intelligence reporting to support the assessment that [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and the Russian government demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump,” the committee’s report says. The panel also found “specific intelligence” to support the conclusion that Putin “approved and directed aspects” of the Kremlin’s interference efforts." ² "A new report by the U.S. intelligence community on Tuesday says Russia sought to help former President Donald Trump in last year's presidential election. But the document also emphasized there was no indication Russia or any other country attempted to alter actual votes." "Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized "influence operations aimed at denigrating President Biden's candidacy and the Democratic Party, supporting Trump, undermining public confidence in the electoral process and exacerbating socio-political divisions in the U.S," says the report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence." "The unclassified document is the most comprehensive look the intelligence community has released regarding foreign efforts to meddle in the 2020 election." "But the central message is the same one the intelligence community has been delivering since last August: Russia wanted Trump to win, though its effort was not on the same scale as in the 2016 election."
    1
  11.  @charlesvan13  - Tell yourself whatever you want.
    1