Comments by "Matt Foley" (@mattfoley6082) on "Rep. Jim Jordan blasts Mueller for dodging questions" video.

  1. Even if Trump committed no crimes, even if he knew the investigation would show he'd committed no crimes, the mere intent to impede or hinder the investigation IS obstruction. This is the Repubs' achilles heel. They don't understand, or they pretend not to know about, this aspect of obstruction.
    1
  2. Even if Trump committed no crimes, even if he knew the investigation would show he'd committed no crimes, the mere intent to impede or hinder the investigation IS obstruction. This is the Repubs' achilles heel. They don't understand, or they pretend not to know about, this aspect of obstruction.
    1
  3. Mueller: Republican, appointed by Republican POTUS, approved 98-0 by Senate. Obvious Hillary shill! The right's smear attempt is hilarious.
    1
  4. Dear Gym, I got so hard watching you talking tough. Devil's Triangle tonight in Oval Office. You, me and Collins. Bring extra lube. Love, DJT
    1
  5. Remember when Trump cooperated with Mueller by agreeing to answer questions? Neither do I.
    1
  6. Mueller's 3 hour grilling reminds of the time Trump agreed to answer questions. Oh wait.
    1
  7. Actual obstruction is not needed as an element of proof to sustain a conviction. The defendant's endeavor to obstruct justice is sufficient. "Endeavor" has been defined by the courts as an effort to accomplish the purpose the statute was enacted to prevent. The courts have consistently held that "endeavor" constitutes a lesser threshold of purposeful activity than a criminal "attempt."
    1