Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "Judge Allows Man to Keep Edited Intimate Photobooks of Ex-Wife" video.

  1. See I view it completely differently. She stole property that was not hers. She gifted the albums to him.
    3
  2.  @user-rw2dr5my1s  lol, you must be a gal.
    2
  3. Doesn't matter. They were his not hers. She committed theft.
    2
  4.  @no_one2197  I find it odd how anyone with half a brain could write what you did. She committed theft. She stole what did not belong to her. She gifted the albums to him. That is like him taking all the jewellery he bought her over their marriage. Then the judge allowing the husband to remove all the gems out of the settings before returning to the wife. The order from the judge was ridiculous legally.
    2
  5. Don't take pictures then maybe.
    2
  6.  @coolbreeze5683  To annoy her by keeping the racey pics. Which is completely his right to do.
    1
  7. She literally stole photo albums that were not hers. She gifted them to him. It's actually ridiculous legally the judge allowed them to be "edited" aka damaged.
    1
  8. You can't steal someones property then be able to damage it before you return it. That is what the judge ordered. It was ridiculous. Would be like he stole all her jewelry he bought her over the marriage then the judge ordering he can remove all the gems out of their settings before returning. lmao WOW indeed.
    1
  9.  @nb-user25  You can't gift art then steal it back. This isn't a hard concept to grasp, sigh...
    1
  10. If you make art and give it as a gift you can't steal it back. This is not a hard concept to grasp
    1
  11. Probably because they aren't hers. She made art and gifted it. She then committed a crime stealing it.
    1
  12. went full feminist crazy
    1
  13.  @hamianagrande  Ya remember granny when she had dementia not year earlier when she was sane. Good argument.
    1