Comments by "Anne Walden" (@annewalden3795) on "Patrick Christys: 'I only hope that Prince Harry is so thick, he doesn't realise what he's done'" video.

Canadian Beef the children need to be identified because it is currently unclear that they exist at all. MM was certainly not pregnant after marrying H . King Charles may of course decide to remove the titles and right of succession which makes the existence of 2 children totally irrelevant though , in my view , it would be better to establish the truth.
28
@canadianbeef1958 Have you heard about the flooding crisis in the Harkle neighbourhood? Apparently H was away promoting his Memoir and MM was completely alone. She contacted a rescue service and was evacuated from the property but Doria was not with her and neither were the children. There is evidence that she has used dolls and borrowed children from friends but when H & M have visited the UK the children never appear on passenger lists. The favoured photograph of Lily appears to be an image of Eugenie's son ( August) wearing a dress and this may have been the cause of ill feeling between the two couples.
7
@rebeccadees2300 Why do you believe H tried to talk to his family ? From what I see the only time H makes contact with his father is to demand money and the most frequent visits to the U K are in pursuit of a new hobby involving legal actions .
6
@Bernaren60 Andrew obviously felt the need to stand out from the crowd .
3
@ebonyanyu2769 You should not spread false rumours about the death of anyone. Recently released evidence indicates the vehicle used by Diana and Dodi was not road worthy and perhaps that is why the driver lost control of it .
3
@kathleenreefer225 Diana said Charles was a good father and he is a good husband to Camilla .
3
@montecristo3697 The date of the Coronation was selected by the British Government.
2
@montecristo3697 He is not a good father and you appear to believe that fiction is fact.
2
@montecristo3697 You eloquence will not impress anyone and your name is hardly original .Why do you bother ?
2
@arcticbadger1 Thank you .I only appreciated that fact over the last few days.
2
@purple4d Perhaps they were excluded on the grounds of age or possibly Buckingham Palace decided to stop playing MM's little game of imaginary children. It really is a ridiculous state of affairs that in 2023 two possible claimants to the throne are basically being held hostage in California . The only solution is to strip H of his titles and remove him and any actual or potential heirs from the line of succession.
1
Susan whoever arranged the seating had a lovely sense of humour.
1
Cheryl who knows .The area of California the Harkles live in was in danger of flooding .The authorities contacted MM ( H was away promoting his Memoir) and she refused to leave .As the situation got worse she actually asked for help and was taken out of the house ; she was completely alone .What happened to the 2 children ? While resident in Canada the staff who ran the house they were occupying said they never saw Archie or any toys , clothes etc belonging to a child ?
1
H & M are denying the children any opportunity to learn about their heritage and history .
1
@claire6795 I would be astonished if suddenly the Harkles produced 2 children with documentation proving they were born to MM .
1
@claire6795 They might as well not exist .
1
@Chere It is not the birthright of children born to surrogates to be included in the line of succession according to the Constitution of the U K.
1