Comments by "Anne Walden" (@annewalden3795) on "Prince Harry should get taxpayer funding as KEY member of Royal Family' argues Martyn Whittock" video.

  1. I disagree strongly because he tendered his resignation as a senior Royal.
    71
  2. Mary me too. No way can a woman of ill repute be our Queen .
    15
  3. Dog friendly the majority of people think H & M are a complete waste of space and should be excluded from the U K .
    13
  4.  @monty4653  The only funding I would agree to is the food and lodging at the Tower of London where they will be confined before the trial in the House of Lords . After they are convicted of treason I think the food and lodging should be paid for by the criminals themselves.
    8
  5. Elizabeth his wife knows the best cosmetic surgeons and could , no doubt , arrange for him to have reconstructive surgery. Once he looks entirely different he can find the privacy he craves and save all the security costs. Simple really .
    3
  6.  @antheavogel9335 I am confident the ingrates will never be King and Queen .It is more likely they will have their titles stripped and that H is removed completely from the line of succession.
    2
  7. Andy only a self absorbed idiot would pursue this issue .He and his dreadful wife planned Megxit and they ought to have included in their decision making this security issue .Surely they did not imagine that the U S government would use taxpayer funds to pay for 24 hour a day security and that the U K government would also pay for security for ex Royals . The only sensible decision these leaches can make is to stay in the U S A where their paid for security detail can carry guns .
    2
  8. Mike far from being key he is damaged goods and to be brutally honest his safety is not at the top of my list of concerns .
    2