Comments by "the truth hurts" (@thetruthhurts7675) on "BFBS Forces News"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Mark-Haddow I rather think heritage would disagree with you totally. Youir Nationality is where you are born, not where your forbears were born. For this you have to thank a Black Labour politician who denies the existence of heritage. Simply by the fact that he and his family for the last 250 years could not survive in the country his antecedents originated. He publically stated heritage beyond one generation is nothing, and to prove it he stated that for a wager anyone from Africa could take on his challenge and go live there unsupprted in the region their family originate. Strangely his challenge has never been taken up. He was, and is descended from namibian bush people also known as Saan. These people exist simply by being able to read the ground from the top. they can tell you by looking if dry sand contains water holes. Victoria was born here, thus is/was English. I was born in England, though my hair colour gives away the fact that my forbears came here with William the conqueror, and were in fact Norwegian/Swedish, and my family name includes "son of" a minor Norwegian Lord. I am English, by heritage, and birth, my mother was german thus I could claim German citizenship, as can my two sons, who can through their mother claim Perian, and Yemeni citizenship. However they will tell you they are English not German, Iranian, or Yemeni. My ex wife's father who was yemeni but serving in the British army had her registered at birth in the British Embassy as British English. Now I don't care what you think of heritage but the present royal Family has lived in this country for well over 100 years, they even anglicised their name to become Windsor. Thus thet also will tell you they are English!!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chrisburke624 Russia doesn't have the capability to land, and sustain a force in the UK. The one thing this has proven, is that what I have been saying about Russia not having the capabilities everyone has been stating for the past ten years is true. They may have a few nukes, a few tactical ones as well, but honestly their present budget for defence doesn't allow for the maintenance of everything they have let alone their forces, Thus they have large army, airforce, and navy personel numbers , but not the numbers of useable equipment everyone thinks they have. The action they did with HMS Duncan in the black sea where they were actually shooting at Duncan as she sailed south of Crimea, and the videos showed they could only use soviet era equipment, and that Duncan probably could have sunk everything that was tailing her with very little expenditure of their ammunition.
2
-
@aleccap5946 You are just trolling here, you obviously have no idea as you have just admitted. There is no whisper of a third carrier at all and as for Traps and cats the QE class proves they are outdated. The Ford Class carrier Gerald R Ford has been around for a year longer than the QE, and what exactly has it done in those 6 years? Nothing at all. They have just finished the basic workups, and finally installed the weapons lifts (which as of yet haven't been tested under sea trials for several weeks in a row, and at full stretch), the carrier has yet to complete the carrier integration tests that the QE and the POW did three years ago which is why both the QE, and POW can command a carrier strike group. The Aircraft numbers are simply because no one yet has the full compliment of aircraft they ordered from McDonnell Douglas. Cameron didn't want traps and cats unless they work which until now EMALS on the Ford class has not. They have ripped the decks apart to put ever more powerful Magnetic runs, and the best they can get is 3 consecutive launches in total, before the system catastrophically breaks down. All Military stuff takes time to integrate, but EMALS is just a joke system. So in the 6 years the Ford has been afloat she has spent a grand total of 5 years 10 months in docks or dry docks. Cameron,. and the Tory government were dead right to dodge that particular bullet, or you could troll even more here. The Chinook was bought by the Labour Governmemt with no recommended additions, like anti collision radar causoing the death of twenty top Northern Ireland security people from both the Army and RUC on the second of June 1994. The best thing Labour have ever done is either resign, or loose the election for the Tory party to sort out their mess.
Oh you asked what 1960's conficts that affected us, well you nothing as a person my bet is you were still a twinkle in your mother and father's eyes. This is the full list opf British conflicts in the 1960's :
Brunei Revolt 1962–1966
Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation 1962-1966
Dhofar Rebellion 1962–1975
Aden Emergency 1963–1967
The Troubles 1968–1998.
Most of those you won't even have heard of I suspect.
Now be a good person and shut up about things you obviously know nothing about!!
Or please tell me exactly why the UN agreed to the 38th parallel at the end of the Korean war. I want to know exactly not "that was the UN agreement."
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dm32904 LOL However Even Georgian goat herders as you call them beat your backsides. Russia has a long, long, history of failure. Heck your army couldn't even beat Finland in WW2 which of course emboldened Hitler to attack Russia!! Though what you say about NATO in afghanistan is NOT correct. To invade Afghanistan NATO would have broken up. ISAF was a UN mandate, and included Sweden (not NATO), New Zealand (not NATO), Azerbaijan, (I don't think Russia, or President Putin, would like you to say they belong to NAO), The UAE (definitely Not NATO), Singapore (Not NATO), Jordan, (Not NATO), Ireland (Not NATO), and rather strangely another Russian controlled country Georgia. Putin invaded here first, they are definitely Not NATO, and I now think you are bound for the Gulag to even state they may be part of NATO!! Putin did in fact vote for the action in the UN, well he orderred his Un delegate to do so.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@war8036 Erm No this is based upon something as a Russian you will not know. The NATO agreement is based solely on the 1947 alliance between Britain and France which has at it's heart the idea of mutual defence, and none aggression. Any country joining NATO effectively signes this defence compact. So there is nothing Western, or Ukrainian in my synopsis of what NATO can, or cannot do. Unlike the most aggerssive country in the world, Russia that is presently dying, and finally will be bought to it's knees by something called the Dutch disease. Do look it up, Russia's whole economy is based upon oil, thus is prey to what is known as Dutch disease. Stopping oil flowing from Russia WILL collapse the Russian economy because there is no other industry to replace it in Fascist Russia!!
The edited bit : You see my knowledge is based upon things like Geopolitics, history, and the fact that I actually did time in the British Forces. So actually know things about what might, or might not happen today.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nodramalama9531 This is her official titles. Do please notice Scotland is not included in her titles :
"Elizabeth II, in full Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, officially Elizabeth II, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of her other realms and territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, (born April 21, 1926, London, England—died September 8, 2022, Balmoral"
Those are her titles. There is no difference in that title for Scotland
2
-
@shannonhenson609 YES we can teach you lts about war. Since WW2 only ONE country has won in Vietnam, and subdued the population. France, the USA, and even China all notably singularly failed in Vietnam where it only took 18 months for the UK to carry out the new UN's mandate. Plus that tiny debacle in the late 18th century was a side note to an actual world war. Britain was fighting the next three world powers (France, Spain, and the Dutch republic) at the same time We ended France as a sea power, we ended both the Dutch republic and Spain as an Empire builder and lost in a then, small backwater country, now called the USA. In fact whilst YOU Australia, and New Zealand were getting your asses handed to you in Vietnam we had to fight alone agianst a Chinese paid for insurgency in a much larger country called Malaya, we won you lost. Sorry bud you were lucky with timing in 1776, is all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1