Comments by "the truth hurts" (@thetruthhurts7675) on "5 SCOTS practise skills and drills for King's coronation" video.

@Mark-Haddow Well said. Also the Queen's mother was Scottish, Bowes Lyon is a Scottish family with a scottish heritage. The Family seat is Glamis Castle, and they are directly descended from the Royal House of Scotland. The previous erk obviously has no idea of the Royal Family's heritage.Just as an aside aren't ALL of the royal families in Europe descended from Victoria? Wasn't she a British/English queen?
4
@Mark-Haddow I rather think heritage would disagree with you totally. Youir Nationality is where you are born, not where your forbears were born. For this you have to thank a Black Labour politician who denies the existence of heritage. Simply by the fact that he and his family for the last 250 years could not survive in the country his antecedents originated. He publically stated heritage beyond one generation is nothing, and to prove it he stated that for a wager anyone from Africa could take on his challenge and go live there unsupprted in the region their family originate. Strangely his challenge has never been taken up. He was, and is descended from namibian bush people also known as Saan. These people exist simply by being able to read the ground from the top. they can tell you by looking if dry sand contains water holes. Victoria was born here, thus is/was English. I was born in England, though my hair colour gives away the fact that my forbears came here with William the conqueror, and were in fact Norwegian/Swedish, and my family name includes "son of" a minor Norwegian Lord. I am English, by heritage, and birth, my mother was german thus I could claim German citizenship, as can my two sons, who can through their mother claim Perian, and Yemeni citizenship. However they will tell you they are English not German, Iranian, or Yemeni. My ex wife's father who was yemeni but serving in the British army had her registered at birth in the British Embassy as British English. Now I don't care what you think of heritage but the present royal Family has lived in this country for well over 100 years, they even anglicised their name to become Windsor. Thus thet also will tell you they are English!!
2
So do pease explain just how Scotland would be better off as an independent country. Then please explain exactly what form of independence Scotland will have. Then please do provide the costs to a Scottish government of running your country, and Finally how are you going to be IF as they have requested Aberdeeen, the Shetlands, and the Orkneys become crown dependencies?
2
@Sagalands What on fullers Earth are you on about? haven't the SNP that socialist entity with at it's very core the removal of all Royal families (after all it is only the left wing of British politics that wants to remove the British monarchy) simply stated that they are happy to have Charles as their defacto king. By the way there were NO Scottish kings before Kenneth MacAlpin he founded the state of Scotland, though he only ruled over Glasgow, and the Clyde!. So there are No more scottish kings before him, and we do know the entire list of all the rest. That is unless you wish to include chieftains in Ireland as Scottish kings!!
1
@Tourist1967 Well as someone who cares about the place invaded, and conquered, by a foreign people who claim sovereignty AKA Scotland. It should be in the interest of every person on the Island of Great Britain what happens in one very poor populated, and poor part of the island. The population of Scotland is LESS than that of Yorkshire. I do wish to know from people who want "independence" if this would mean at greater cost to my country England. Which it very obviously will!!
1