Comments by "Yo2" (@yo2trader539) on "TAKASHii" channel.

  1. 189
  2. 38
  3. 36
  4. 26
  5. 24
  6. 21
  7. 21
  8. 21
  9. 20
  10. 18
  11. 17
  12. 15
  13. 14
  14. 13
  15. 12
  16. 12
  17. 12
  18. 11
  19. 11
  20. 10
  21. 10
  22. 10
  23. 10
  24. 9
  25. 8
  26.  @somerandomchannel382  Japan exists for the sake of Japanese citizens. So if you're not a citizen, there will be natural limitations. If you're a Japanese citizen without proper Japanese education, there will be limitations within Japanese society as well. And if you're a foreign national without any formal Japanese education, unless you have advanced professional or academic skills that Japan values and needs, there will be far less career opportunities. It will be near impossible to be a lawyer, doctor, public school teacher, or architect in Japan without having received formal education in Japanese. The issue we have these days is that there are a number of children of foreign nationals who were born and raised in Japan, like the guy in this video. I recall seeing a girl in a documentary, who is half Nikkei-Brazilian and half-Indonesian and born & raised in Japan, and her childhood dream/goal was to become a police officer in Japan (like her grandfather in Brazil). But Japan doesn't allow foreign nationals to enter its Police Academy. Her dream would've been possible if her parents naturalized along with the kids. But they didn't or couldn't, and the girl doesn't want to give up her foreign passports. So she is still a foreign national with legal residency due to her Japanese ancestry. She now runs a school in Japan assisting foreign-children learning Japanese. Conversely, there have been naturalized elected officials for decades. There is only one definition the Japanese government uses in determining who is Japanese or not, i.e. Japanese citizenship.
    8
  27. 8
  28. 8
  29. 7
  30. 7
  31. 7
  32. 7
  33. Japan has always been selective. Immigration rules were designed to discourage people who couldn't survive in Japan (or people who we didn't want). For instance, a foreign/international student who graduated from a Japanese university or grad school will almost automatically receive a 5-year work visa, because they are fluent in language/culture, educated, and most likely to succeed. Conversely, Japanese immigration will only issue 1 year visas (or sometimes less) to those who have limited language fluency or technical skills. Japan's worst fear is exactly Europe, where we can see ethnic ghettos, Islamic extremists, gangs, or homeless migrants living off of handouts. Limited language and technical skill, usually results in limited probability to succeed. The concept of new visa schemes such as J-FIND and J-SKIP are based on this belief that we need to attract more educated or highly-skilled professionals. In reality, we've experienced the increase in crime and violence for decades (which is why Ministry of Justice, Immigration, and Police are always very conservative when it comes to visa restrictions). It was mostly crimes by Koreans in the 20th century, particularly after WWII and Korean War period. They were later usurped by Chinese who started coming around the 1980s and 1990s. Iranians came too but they were in heroin business so most of them were asked to leave. Nikkei-Brazilians, Nikkei-Peruvians were always given special preference over visa allotments because of their Japanese ancestry. Currently, Chinese and Vietnamese make up 60% of all crimes committed by foreign-nationals in Japan. The rest are mostly Koreans, Brazilians, and Filipino. Nowadays, a lot of attention is on the ethnic Kurds in Saitama. They're only 2,000 Kurdish asylum-seekers in Japan, yet they create so much chaos and havoc, locals desperately want them deported. Around the same number of Ukrainian refugees are currently in Japan, yet they cause absolutely no problem and are well liked. I don't know how to explain the stark contrast in their respective behaviors. But I do suspect that change in Refugee Law was targeted for easier deportation of declined applicants.
    7
  34. 7
  35. 6
  36. 6
  37. 6
  38. 6
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. 6
  42. 6
  43. 6
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 5
  48. 5
  49.  @harryhaller7153  People have been migrating and mixing in all directions in Eurasia since the last ice age. Thus, language, culture, and identity is not the same as genetics. Rus are already a pre-mixture of Scandinavian and Baltic people. Have you not learned why Russian phonetics diverged from Belarusian and Ukrainian (aka Ruthenian) in the past few centuries? Or why some in Russian aristocracy had Tatar ancestry, or why Turkic/Tatar words entered Russian vocabulary. Just look at a map from 500 years ago, you'll quickly realize that many "ethnic Russians" living in modern Russian Federation are descendants of Russified indigenous people who were absorbed into the Russian sphere. (Ironic as it may sound, Tatars were the most loyal supporters of Imperial Russia till the end. And Turkic-speaking Gagauz in Moldova are still loyal to Russia.) And it's not just in Russia. Ukrainian "Cossack" is also a Turkic/Tatar word, having the same cognate with the name Kazakh. Cossack weapons, music, culture, hairstyle, or lifestyle is heavily Turkic/Tatar in nature. They Slavicized and became foot soldiers of Imperial Russia, and were given lands all across newly conquered territories. So a descendant of a Ukrainian Cossack living in Krasnodar...is he a Ukrainian, Russian, or Tatar? By the way, Putin also has partial East Eurasian genetics, but his family roots is with Belarus. And he identifies as an ethnic Russian. There is nothing wrong with that, because culture/identity is not the same as genetic ancestry.
    5
  50. 5