Comments by "The SMR" (@SergyMilitaryRankings) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

  1.  @frost3840  they would have ran out of ammunition and supplies ages ago if it wasn't for NATO, it's honestly hilarious how dumb people can be, it's like thinking Vietnam managed to beat the US all by themselves, completely forgetting the tremendous amount of soviet supplies. Same here, it's honestly baffling some of the takes from people, from saying Russias has no weapons left, they're always drunk, they are fleeing, they're not a modern military, it's honestly a shocking indictment of the education system that so many people fail to distinguish between truth and propoganda, it's crazy.
    1
  2.  @ZootyZoFo  lmfao literally everything you said is wrong, why would they risk fighters when they can just fire missles and they use fighters and sir support all the time, maybe do some Actual research instead of just repeating what you see on western media. Russia doesn't have the ability to supress anti air batteries 🤣🤣 they have multiple different surface to ground and anti SAM capabilities, you're absolutely clueless and have no idea what you're talking about, it's blatantly obvious you're just repeating what you read online, Russia is literally a major military power, it's obvious you know absolutely nothing about military tactics or equipment because everything you said is false
    1
  3. ​ @31mAyMgaYanga  lmfao I love how even after Ukraine has failed in multiple counter attacks, Russia has taken a major town, but yet they are still struggling, that's unbelievable amounts of copium, only people who think Russia is incompetent is idiots who unironically believe what they read on CNN or fox.
    1
  4. Yeah, I mean it was already in Ukraine, it's just defending 🥴
    1
  5. This movie is the perfect example of what real combat is like, but I understand people who haven't been in combat wouldn't get that
    1
  6. This movie is a great example, this guy is clueless and has never been in combat
    1
  7.  @hrmpug1092  where did he say that ?
    1
  8.  @dendemano  you sound like someone who's never seen real combat or thinks combat is gunning down farmers with AKs with air support, artillery and tanks, I've worked in hospitals that were under fire, people like you get to go back to a nice cushy barracks with air conditioning, game consoles, TVs, the works. But tbh you sound like the only combat you've ever seen is playing team Death match on call of duty, which is why you're trying to sound tough when literally nobody asked, people like you are laughed at, social media warrior.
    1
  9. ​ @11cookeaw14 how did it not age well lmao
    1
  10. ​ @SD78 and now, soledar has fallen, bakmhut has fallen and new counter offensive has failed 😂
    1
  11.  @MrZlocktar  well a lot of that is true but even if US does cut support to Ukraine they still have the EU, UK, Canada, Australia and South Korea providing arms and munitions, based on military supplies I'd like say they need both the US and EU to stop sending weapons as it's those two that provide most of the weapons and ammunition for it to seriously reduce Ukraines ability, it's also Brussels and Washington that stoked this conflict with Brussels promising to pay Ukraine debt off on condition of cutting ties with Russia and promised EU membership and US was promising NATO membership. The maiden riots and coup in 2014 can largely be blamed on Washington and Brussels, all so that Lockheed, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Rheinmetall, BAE, Leonardo, Czech Defence Systems and Dassault can make bank
    1
  12.  @beorntwit711  the pro Russia ukranians rebelling in donbas, I suggest you research the maiden riots, 2014 coup and suppression of pro Russia supporters.
    1
  13.  @miriamweller812  yeah, according to them the counter offensive went well, I mean out of their goals of splitting Russian army and half zaporozhia and Kherson Oblasts they captured ~400km2 out of ~44,000km2 😂 when Russia has captured close to 900km2 since January 😆
    1
  14.  @Mortablunt  they were unbelievably biased, they got caught using Photoshop to paint Z signs on ukranian vehicles 😂 Mediazona is the only source for losses I listen to
    1
  15.  @nataliasalmanova6020  my friend is from Sevastopol who lived in Donetsk city said that the town was used for all rocket and artillery strikes, even to this day
    1
  16.  @juliantheapostate8295  Russia only had ~14,000 in total pre war and only the ability to produce 200-600 tanks a year 😂 It shows how ludicrous United24 numbers are
    1
  17. It's a stalemate. Russia pushing in east whilst Ukraine just captured kramaktov in kursk
    1
  18. ​ @perrydunlap3076  I love how people who don't just slam Russia are seen as pro Russia, you see Russia fists and flags because Russias is winning
    1
  19. Washington and Brussels: "some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice, im willing to make"
    1
  20. It is propaganda, Russia has only had ONE partial mobilization, meanwhile Ukraine has had SIX. That tells you everything, they are literally saying they need another 500,000 men just to keep fighting. Keep coping.
    1
  21. Ukrainian copium is hilarious, same wgej they were losing in bakmhut "oUr gOaL iS tO gRiNd rUsSIA dOwN" if you know the stats you know Russia is winning
    1
  22.  @mrmeepsyt5917  so Wagner didn't defeat Ukraine at bakmhut ?
    1
  23.  @Pearlsrat  Wagner literally defeated the Ukrainian army, keep smoking copium and living in denial
    1
  24. ​ @Emperormonkeman  agreed, which is why a zelensky movie would be interesting.
    1
  25. Losses are part and parcel of warfare. Look at how much equipment USA lost in Vietnam
    1
  26. Yeah but difference is M1A1 Abrams is still 3rd gen with composite armour, it's just not the depleted uranium stuff, T-72M has its composite armour removed and Inferior fire control systems. It's basically a 2nd gen tank instead of 2+ lol
    1
  27. I think Ukraine has to retreat miles then build proper defence lines
    1
  28. 3. Russia has had the equipment to destroy these vehicles since forever, russian ground Force has always been the most powerful on earth up until last year when China overtook them
    1
  29. Phahahahahaha 😭😭 god the copium
    1
  30. Warrior Maven unironically said "Abrams will act as a deterrent when russian forces see it they will run" I'm not joking
    1
  31. Forbes, Defence Express and National Interest have been coping HARD lately
    1
  32. Your point about Leopard 1A5 was moronic.
    1
  33. ?
    1
  34. Turkey got wrecked by Greece 😂
    1
  35.  @quitlying1948  1. they're not just in one place 2. It's irrelevant, deployed is deployed
    1
  36.  @quitlying1948  irrelevant, also they have thousands in Africa and Syria
    1
  37. Meanwhile Russia has 900,000 beyond its borders 😂
    1
  38. @Silo-x  urban combat is worse FOR THE SOLDIER. That's just personal opinion from a military and logistical standpoint SECURING urban areas is far easier for the reasons I already explained. Let me explain since you obviously know nothing about military tactics. In a guerilla war Urban environments might be more challenging on an individual level for a soldier due to the easy hiding places, prevalence of IEDs and sheer number of areas needed to move between. But from a military standpoint it's easier to secure. Open areas are harder because for a permanent security you need to build an FOB, then you need to build checkpoints then you need more overall soldiers for patrol because its much larger. Combined with the extra logistical burden because its far off. Again there's a reason why the majority of engagements during the Afghanistan wars happened outside of large urban centers
    1
  39. @Silo-x  urban combat is worse FOR THE SOLDIER. That's just personal opinion from a military and logistical standpoint SECURING urban areas is far easier for the reasons I already explained. Let me explain since you obviously know nothing about military tactics. In a guerilla war Urban environments might be more challenging on an individual level for a soldier due to the easy hiding places, prevalence of IEDs and sheer number of areas needed to move between. But from a military standpoint it's easier to secure. Open areas are harder because for a permanent security you need to build an FOB, then you need to build checkpoints then you need more overall soldiers for patrol because its much larger. Combined with the extra logistical burden because its far off. Again there's a reason why the majority of engagements during the Afghanistan wars happened outside of large urban centers same with 2nd Chechnyan War after Russia secured the large urban areas with ease it was the open areas and small settlements that gave the most issue's. This is why it's absolutely pathetic that they can't secure a city even after a year.
    1
  40. @Silo-x  protects their people lmao is that why yhey have the hannibal directive
    1
  41. @Silo-x  Are you actually trolling ? Protects their people? Is that why they have the han directive that orders them to wipe their own people lmao.
    1
  42. @Silo-x  Are you actually trolling ? Protects their people? Is that why they have the han directive that orders them to wipe their own people lmao. IS is the most barb army out there. They're a cruel settler colonialist military
    1
  43. @Silo-x  Are you actually trolling ? Protects their people? Is that why they have the hannibal directive that orders them to wipe their own people lmao. IS is the most barbaric army out there. They're an evil settler colonialist who's army is used to keep their illegal occupation of 🇵🇸 going.
    1
  44. @Silo-x  you have no clue about warfare. Urban environments are EASIER to secure than open Desert ones. 1. More cover 2. There's buildings to set up logistics and quicker more secure FOAs 3. Less area Honestly it's hilarious how wrong you are. In wars like guerrilla Afghanistan the large urban areas were easily secured. It was the large open Desert areas with small settlements that were tough. AGAIN H and H are MILITIAS IS is a FULL military. The fact IS needs help to fight militias when they are a FULL MILITARY shows how utterly incompetent they are
    1
  45. @Silo-x  you have no clue what you're talking about. Firstly is that why Arabic countries have multiple ICC and ICJ warrants, is that why they're all a pariah ? US, iran and Russia attack military structures, you attack civilian ones because your military is that useless. Your literally just proving my point. Open Desert environments are more challenging yet the US and USSR secured all of Afghanistan with ease. Meanwhile you can't secure a single city whilst you have overwhelming superiority in everything. H did no such thing. Attacking civs is literally part of your doctrine. The dahiya. You do what you do in every war when it gets too tough. Cry to US and EU for support. You have not fought a SINGLE war where you did not have direct or indirect military assistance from both US and EU state's. You are easily the most useless military.
    1
  46.  @salbalopes7511  Russia was only losing in 2022 post 2023 they have been winning consistently
    1
  47. @Silo-x  Afghanistan has numerous small and large urban environments. Desert environments are harder to take because There's little cover and no bases for logistics. The IOF is a full fledged military with modern tanks, fighters and Artillery yet it can't even secure a city that Is protected by people who use homemade mortars and are nearly a month into the L incursion. Again this is what happens when your soldiers are too used to fighting unarmed opponents. Can you imagine this was actually Iran they were fighting.
    1
  48.  @Silo-x  US took over all of Afghanistan within a week and AGAIN H and H are militias fighting a military. The fact 🇮🇱 are supposed to be one of the best militaries yet can't secure a city is VERY telling
    1
  49. Yeah actually. Compared to iSSrael anyway ​ @fizzgigmalmy2567 
    1
  50.  @mistressofeconomicinvincib7017  1.that doesn't prove anything. 2. I'll ask again who in Russia high command said 3 days
    1