Comments by "The SMR" (@SergyMilitaryRankings) on "How Israel CRUSHED Hezbollah’s First Line of Defense" video.

 @historylegends IOF also claim they are the most moral army on earth
61
The IOF reminds me of the Ugandan army under Amin. Great and terrifying when facing unarmed men along with women and children, terrible when facing an actual military (when they foight Tanzania)
48
"How a proper military crushed a militias defence" Not really anything worth bragging about tbh. The fact that they cant take a city whilst having overwhelming air supremacy with tanks, AFVs and a sophisticated C2 network showd how utterly incompetent they are
7
@Silo-x winning? They've not even taken a city yet
5
@Silo-x beating ? Mate what reality do you live in. They can't even push a few dozen kilometres into L
3
@Silo-x Iraq had an actual military and the US secured Afghanistan within a week so nonsense argument. You say they're incompetent yet they're just small militias holding off one of the most sophisticated militaries on earth. Delusional
2
Yeah actually. Compared to iSSrael anyway @fizzgigmalmy2567
1
@Silo-x US took over all of Afghanistan within a week and AGAIN H and H are militias fighting a military. The fact 🇮🇱 are supposed to be one of the best militaries yet can't secure a city is VERY telling
1
@Silo-x Afghanistan has numerous small and large urban environments. Desert environments are harder to take because There's little cover and no bases for logistics. The IOF is a full fledged military with modern tanks, fighters and Artillery yet it can't even secure a city that Is protected by people who use homemade mortars and are nearly a month into the L incursion. Again this is what happens when your soldiers are too used to fighting unarmed opponents. Can you imagine this was actually Iran they were fighting.
1
@salbalopes7511 Russia was only losing in 2022 post 2023 they have been winning consistently
1
@Silo-x you have no clue what you're talking about. Firstly is that why Arabic countries have multiple ICC and ICJ warrants, is that why they're all a pariah ? US, iran and Russia attack military structures, you attack civilian ones because your military is that useless. Your literally just proving my point. Open Desert environments are more challenging yet the US and USSR secured all of Afghanistan with ease. Meanwhile you can't secure a single city whilst you have overwhelming superiority in everything. H did no such thing. Attacking civs is literally part of your doctrine. The dahiya. You do what you do in every war when it gets too tough. Cry to US and EU for support. You have not fought a SINGLE war where you did not have direct or indirect military assistance from both US and EU state's. You are easily the most useless military.
1
@Silo-x you have no clue about warfare. Urban environments are EASIER to secure than open Desert ones. 1. More cover 2. There's buildings to set up logistics and quicker more secure FOAs 3. Less area Honestly it's hilarious how wrong you are. In wars like guerrilla Afghanistan the large urban areas were easily secured. It was the large open Desert areas with small settlements that were tough. AGAIN H and H are MILITIAS IS is a FULL military. The fact IS needs help to fight militias when they are a FULL MILITARY shows how utterly incompetent they are
1
@Silo-x Are you actually trolling ? Protects their people? Is that why they have the hannibal directive that orders them to wipe their own people lmao. IS is the most barbaric army out there. They're an evil settler colonialist who's army is used to keep their illegal occupation of 🇵🇸 going.
1
@Silo-x Are you actually trolling ? Protects their people? Is that why they have the han directive that orders them to wipe their own people lmao. IS is the most barb army out there. They're a cruel settler colonialist military
1
@Silo-x Are you actually trolling ? Protects their people? Is that why they have the han directive that orders them to wipe their own people lmao.
1
@Silo-x protects their people lmao is that why yhey have the hannibal directive
1
@Silo-x urban combat is worse FOR THE SOLDIER. That's just personal opinion from a military and logistical standpoint SECURING urban areas is far easier for the reasons I already explained. Let me explain since you obviously know nothing about military tactics. In a guerilla war Urban environments might be more challenging on an individual level for a soldier due to the easy hiding places, prevalence of IEDs and sheer number of areas needed to move between. But from a military standpoint it's easier to secure. Open areas are harder because for a permanent security you need to build an FOB, then you need to build checkpoints then you need more overall soldiers for patrol because its much larger. Combined with the extra logistical burden because its far off. Again there's a reason why the majority of engagements during the Afghanistan wars happened outside of large urban centers same with 2nd Chechnyan War after Russia secured the large urban areas with ease it was the open areas and small settlements that gave the most issue's. This is why it's absolutely pathetic that they can't secure a city even after a year.
1
@Silo-x urban combat is worse FOR THE SOLDIER. That's just personal opinion from a military and logistical standpoint SECURING urban areas is far easier for the reasons I already explained. Let me explain since you obviously know nothing about military tactics. In a guerilla war Urban environments might be more challenging on an individual level for a soldier due to the easy hiding places, prevalence of IEDs and sheer number of areas needed to move between. But from a military standpoint it's easier to secure. Open areas are harder because for a permanent security you need to build an FOB, then you need to build checkpoints then you need more overall soldiers for patrol because its much larger. Combined with the extra logistical burden because its far off. Again there's a reason why the majority of engagements during the Afghanistan wars happened outside of large urban centers
1