Comments by "The SMR" (@SergyMilitaryRankings) on "Why Being a U.S. Infantryman During WW2 was Hell" video.

  1. When you realize that the Normandy landings during omaha beach would have been a good day on the Eastern front 💀
    233
  2.  @ivannegrozni7692  да, и многие забывают, что западные союзники воевали гораздо меньше по сравнению с Советами.
    32
  3.  @Allmotorzl1  so ? They had dozens and dozens of cruisers and Destroyers, over 100 major subs and hundreds of attack boats. Saying they had no navy is objectively wrong. US barely had any artillery at start of war compared to Soviets yet you don't say they had no artillery
    5
  4.  @tylermorrison420  yeah that's what happens when you are carrying the team
    4
  5.  @Hereford1642  it is a nonsense timescale because US wasn't fighting in western Europe before 1944. Yeah because the Soviets did the majority of the fighting in Europe. Your military faced the scraps of Germany and still got clapped
    2
  6.  @vethenoir  it's not really though. It's still only a few dozen km² per day
    2
  7.  @Allmotorzl1  had no navy ? Deary me.
    2
  8. That's a false equivalence because US had only bedb fighting in western Europe from June 1944 to May 1945
    1
  9. ​ @vethenoir  no movements
    1
  10.  @vethenoir  tiny settlement with a few dozen km² captured
    1
  11.  @vethenoir  this is not a maneuver war. Barely any land is taken
    1
  12. Most where civilians both Germany and USSR did most of fighting hence why Germany lost 4-6m troops and USSR lost 8-10m
    1
  13. Cope
    1
  14.  @Allmotorzl1  how does your point stand ? Cruisers and destroyers literally made up the back bone if naval power US left from Britain. Fighters and bombers left from South of England not carriers. Soviets could have easily done itv
    1
  15.  @luigimrlgaming9484  everyone contributed to the war effort. My point is just that Germans and Soviets seen the worst of it
    1