Comments by "WhatAboutTheBee" (@WhatAboutTheBee) on "Putin Has Only ONE OPTION LEFT. But He WON'T ACCEPT It..." video.

@STHFGDBY Putin puts on ladies clothing, and hangs around in bars.
4
russia cannot unilaterally declare victory and the war ends. The nation of Ukraine has something to say about that! russia has to conquer all of Ukraine and install a puppet government before unilateral victory can be declared. russia simply doesn't have the numbers to accomplish this task.
3
@Roger_Gadd Ukraine will force russia out just like the Mujahideen forced them out of Afghanistan. You see, Ukraine doesn't have to win in the traditional sense, they just have to keep fighting until russia decides enough is enough. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia needs to occupy with 880,000 troopers. russia doesn't have those numbers. Not even close. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the reality is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. For 20 years. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will.
2
@Roger_Gadd the major difference is that the Mujahideen weren't nearly as well armed as Ukrainians are. Sure, we slipped a few stingers over the border into Afghanistan, but nothing even remotely suggestive of what we are sending to Ukraine. Who us getting lend lease this time? "I want to tell you what, from the Russian point of view, the president and the United States have done for victory in this war," Stalin said. "The most important things in this war are the machines.... The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war."
1
With intense curiosity, I watched Benjamin, of Bald and Bankrupt, meander around russia. He met some lovely people and russia seemed like a wonderful place. But then I remember. putin isn't driving the tanks. putin isn't flying the jets. putin isn't injecting launch codes into missiles that fly into cities. putin isn't pulling the triggers on thousands of rifles. putin may issue orders, but the actual genocide? Nay, Nay. Who is? The russian people.
1