Comments by "" (@MrDaiseymay) on "The New Culture Forum" channel.

  1. I first came accross James Delingpole a couple of years ago, when he wrote a small column in the Western Daily Press. He ( rightly) was attacking a outbreak of sanctimonious self righteousness madness, of the worst and most pointless kind. Coming from the Far Left / Liberals of the City, ( where else) they were spreading hatred towards one of Bristol City's greatest benefactors--the great Edward Colston. Many well known examples of the mans acknowledged generosity i.e Schools , Statues , placgues , and the famous ''Colston Hall'. ALL of which, they wanted erased or name changed. All because, apparently , unbeknown to this generation, Colston's money, was gained by trading in slaves, as millions had since the Ancient Egyptians. As if any of their protestations , would make any difference to what had occurred 200 years before. The up-starter of this madness, was the Labour MP for Bristol West, Thangam Debbonaire.. I kid you not.
    1
  2.  @bennyblanco6719  yooooooosilly twisted boy
    1
  3.  @TheConscientiousView  so ?
    1
  4. if you doubt this revelation, check out Bliars Speeches to the press. it's all true.
    1
  5. AT LAST---NUMBER ONE, IDENTIFY YOUR ENEMY, AND THEN, PLAN A FEASEABLE YET WORKABLE, AND LEGAL PLAN OF ATTACK.
    1
  6. So get fucking, you stags, and catchup.
    1
  7.  fan8281  WELL SAID---that just about cover's it.
    1
  8. I LOVE THAT REFERENCE TO MANDELSON. BEING THE KINGS 'STOOL' REMOVER , HOW WONDERFULLY APT. I VISITED THE WONDERFUL TUDOR ' COMPTON WYNYATES'' IN THE 1970'S, THERE CANNOT BE A BUILDING ANYWHERE, WITH SUCH AMAZING SPIRAL CHIMNEYS, AND WONDERFUL GROUNDS. PITY THEY CLOSED IT TO THE PUBLIC, SO LONG AGO.
    1
  9. I'm very surprised, that Rafe Heydel-Mankoo, having raised that very important fact, implying that the current younger generation, have clearly been indoctrinatated (my claim not his) by hard left political brainwashing--BECAUSE. I read in a national Newspaper , 3 years ago, That the E.U had funded a concentrated harvesting, of most of the BBC heads, of political programming, and productions; be they holder's of current positions, or in retirement. The purpose being ? to fund their positioning, as heads of all our most presdigious Universities and schools. All their names were listed. As former BBC Marxist mouth pieces, they were obviously well suited for the task in hand. I'm just surprised that Rafe didn't raise this issue.
    1
  10. I totally agree with all he says, but i can't watch all this, we are overwhelmed by well meaning people like him, saying the same thing; which is GOOD,, but because NOTHING will be done about it, no matter how, many people stand up and state the obvious. Our ONLY chance of survival, is to prevent all main political parties from seizing power ,with habbitual Lies.
    1
  11. @Doris Day THATS HOW YOU DESTROY NATIONAL COHESION AND UNITY, FROM THAT COMES APATHY AND DEFEAT.
    1
  12. There has been a deliberate programme of attack, on western society and culture, for several decades. Destruction from within. Undermine our national cohesion and sense of belonging, and defeatism and apathy , become established, and capitulation is complete.
    1
  13. Some commenter's here ,mention the word cohesion, and ,no disrepect to those immigants, who have grasped Britains values; and would lay down their lives to protect said values; but far too many, have not, and probably never will, drink from that cup. The most common association with such thoughts, is tied to the beleif, that the WW2 'cohesion' ,that drew us all together, will never, worryingly, show itself again, to ANY degree. It is my belief, that the marxist led 'programme of, dissection of British values, shows itself, as I have described. Prince Philips loss, really is, another brick, from the wall.
    1
  14. NO, MAINSTREAM PARTY SHOULD BE TRUSTED, WITH A SINGLE VOTE, THEY ALL SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE WITH ONE VOICE. VOTE ''REFORM'', THEY WILL HAVE A CANDIDATE FOR EVERY CONSTITUENCY.; OR OUR GRANDCHILDREN WILL HAVE NO COUNTRY TO CALL THEIR OWN, AND CONDEM US FOR EVER, AS COWARDS AND SLAVES.
    1
  15. It should have been made absolutely clear from the beguinning. NOBODY but NOBODY, gets preferential treatment or spacial allowances, under our laws, upon entry into the Uk. What happened to that test that necomer's were subjected to pass, before being given a British Passport? The laws terms and conditions, should have been made crystal clear; and the response for breaking it, re-patriation !!
    1
  16. I've admired this man for years, Straight talking commonsense.--Judging by some of these bone heads here, the li d has come off their scull, and the rain got in
    1
  17.  li d  expert at gargling eh?
    1
  18. It's all your fault Peter---you have driven them totally mad----with the truth.
    1
  19.  Chris Stevens  Oh they don't mention that--OR, the Pirate/Slaver's of THE BARBARY COAST, of North Africa, who raided towns on the Southwest coast of Britain, in the 17th century, and carted off thousands of British people , into SLAVERY . OR, THE ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL HELP, THE WHITE SLAVER'S GOT FROM THE DOMINANT AFRICAN TRIBES, WHO WERE ONLY TOO GLAD, TO CAPTURE THEIR WEAKER ENEMIES, AND HAND THEM OVER, FOR THE TRADITIONAL, BUCKET OF GLASS BEADS. OR--THE ARABS, WHO WERE CAPTURING AFRICAN SLAVES, FOR 1000 YEARS BEFORE THE WHITES DISCOVERED AFRICA. AND, ARE STILL DOING IT.
    1
  20.  Dawaleeb Alhawa  selective idiocy
    1
  21. I have written this on YouTube, many times,----According to a national newspaper, about three years ago, the E.U purged the BBC of it's Political heads, of programming and production--even retired ones, and at their expense, set them up in similar positions, in most of our top Universities and schools of higher education. Their names were listed. You could say that their effect, has been very obvious these last few years.
    1
  22.  @bushwhacked7112  YOU MUST BE JOKING !! UNWITTINGLY ?? THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME , FOR GAWDSAKE.
    1
  23.    The only exception is their channel 4. I seek out their older, better quality, documentary's for instance. These repeats ,I don't mind.
    1
  24.  @chrisneedham5803  WOULDN'T, COULDN'T BE WORSE.
    1
  25. The BBC, as a body, and organisation, is ok, The funding needs a Radical change, BUT, the structure of it's management ,AND employees, need a top down gutting. They are beyond redemption. they---steered and crewed the ship, onto the rocks.
    1
  26. PAUSE ? YOU A /O, R-E-V-E-R-S-E-D !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1
  27.  @ivordavies8036  I HEARD OF SOME CRAZY BELIEFS OF OUR YOUNG, BUT THE NHS?? JEEEZUS, I'M NOT A LABOUR SUPPORTER, BUT GIVEN THAT THE EU. IS LIB LAB BIASED, YOU'D THINK THEY'D KNOW OF ANEURIN BEVAN'S FORCEFUL INVOLVEMENT IN IMPLEMENTING THE WELFARE STATE; WOULDN'T YOU ?
    1
  28. The bastards have just announced they're dropping the over 75's free viewing scheme.
    1
  29. GOOD POINT 'THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH'' BUT, THAT CERTAINLY HASN'T BEEN THE CASE, FOR MANY YEARS. IT WAS REPORTED ON YOU TUBE SOME YEARS AGO, THAT THE E.U, HAD FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED THE BBC, TO THE TUNE OF MULTI MILLIONS OF EUROS, UP TO THAT TIME, WITH THE PROVISO, THAT THEY DID NOT SHOW ANY NEGATIVE REPORTS, ABOUT THEM, AND E.U MEMBER STATES.'' SOUNDS LIKE BRIBERY TO ME. REPORTING WITH HEAVY ONE SIDED BIAS IS ONE THING, WE CAN SPOT THAT AND IGNORE IT, WHEN NECESSARY, BUT, IT'S THE NONE REPORTAGE, AND SELECTIVITY THAT IS DANGEROUS; AND TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE FOR A FREE AND DEMOCRATIC WESTERN MEDIA , OF THEIR, 'FORMER' STANDING.
    1
  30. For once. I agree with Peter Hitchens
    1
  31. ALL SO-CALLED MAIN MEDIA , WHO PURPORT TO BE THE BRINGER OF REAL NEWS AND BALANCED REPORTING, ARE RIGHTFULLY, NOT ONLY IN REAL AND DESERVED DANGER OF EXTINCTION, BUT WILL ACHIEVE THAT VERY QUICKLY, IF THEY DON'T LEARN THE TRUTH, OF THEIR DISGRACEFUL SHORTCOMINGS , BY FAILING TO NOTE AND ACT UPON THE PROFESSIONAL AND INFORMATIVE QUALITY, OF YOUR PROGRAMME PETER, THAT HAS BEEN SO WELL RECEIVED ,BY THE VIEWING PUBLIC.
    1
  32. AND WHEN THOSE WHO SUBVERT DEMOCRACY , TO GAIN POWER, AND WE LOSE ALL--FOR GOOD, AS IN NAZI GERMANY AND MORE LIKE (THE SOVIETS) ?
    1
  33. EXCELLENT, STU.
    1
  34. ABSOLUTELY PHILIP, I COULDN'T AGREE MORE, IS THAT RIGHT PHIL--OH YES, YOU'RE ALWAYS RIGHT, I KNOW.
    1
  35. EVER SINCE BLAIR TOOK POWER CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY, THE ACT OF TREACHERY HAS CONTINUED, NO MATTER WHO WAS IN DOWNING STREET. IT IS A ONGOING, DELIBERATE CONSPIRACY, AGAINST WE, THE PEOPLE. WE CAN OF COURSE, SEE TO IT, THAT THE CURRENT POLITICAL PARTY, IN POWER, NEVER, RETURNS IN FUTURE---REGARDLESS. A NEW, UNASHAMEDLY RIGHT-WING PARTY, ( PUTTING OUR COUNTRY FIRST ) MUST BE VOTED INTO POWER. A S A P.
    1
  36. That's the phylosophy of the great Bernard Manning, if it makes'em laff. that fine. if not, it gets dumped.
    1
  37. YES BUT INEXCUSABLE, I HOPE THE WHOLE STRUCTURE IS GUTTED, AND REBUILT ON COMMERCIAL LINES.
    1
  38. EXCELLENT discussion, I'm sorry it had to end. They all said the right things EXCEPT, it's the BBC MANAGEMENT, at ALL levels, including and especially, their so-called NEWS? department, who should all, be thrown out and GUTTED from top to bottem -WHY ? because they are ALL, irredeemably Neo-Communist in thought and action, and always will be. It needs to be politically neutral, and run by open-minded people, like the great BBC Director General , Sir Hugh Greene. 1960--9. and Bill Cotton. these men always put first, what the general public wanted. They had an instinct for it, and encouraged new ideas, much of it controvertial, even in the sixties. Politics, Genda , etc etc and all this modern ludicrous bullshit irrelevance, wasn't even considered. Was it good ? clever? funny? will it be viewd by all the family, THAT was the criteria. And, if it was ''adult' in content, a watershed time was set, which, with warnings, passed the moral choice to the parents, where it belonged. GOOD OLD DAYS.
    1
  39. This is clearly a waste of time, we are not, going to hear a senior copper, admit that those under him, are 'guilty' of abusing or deliberately misinterpreting their power's. It has never happened before and never will , freemasonry see's to that. This is a political issue, meaning. the LAW has to be changed, drastically, and all wishy-washy doubt , and space for biased misinterpretation by Leftist brainwashed lunatics, whereever they are in the system, removed--PRONTO.
    1
  40. WE--the public, had FAR more freedom to express our opinions, in the 18th century. SO much for FREEDOM.
    1
  41. IT'S JUNE 20TH 24, NOW WHATCH PETER'S PROGRAME ' THE NEW CULTURE FORUM'' WHERE HE PLAYS A VIDEO OF STARMER & KAHAN, DISCUSSING PLANS TO ILLEGALISE ANY---CRITICISM, OF ISLAM, AS HE STATED ABOVE, WITH SEVERE PUNISHMENT. AND, MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE YOUKNOW, GETS TO SHARE THIS, DO NOT---VOTE LABOUR. ACTUALLY, IT'S OPPOSITE IN ONE OF THETHUMNAIL'S
    1
  42. Add a Public comment ? why bother ?
    1
  43. OBVIOUSLY, THIS, LIKE THE OTHER SHITE---PC, IS ALL PART OF THE NWO BRAINWASHING PLAN, THAT ALTIMATELY ENDS IN A WORLD OF AUTOMATONS, PERFECT FOR THE DYSTOPEAN WORLD, THAT'S WAITING FOR THEM.
    1
  44. An excellent wide ranging discussion, I will share it with friends all over the world.
    1
  45. Even the treacherous creator / promoter of Multiculture and diversity, Tony BLIAR and Co, admitted publicly, that it was a failure, AND, that it could NEVER WORK.
    1
  46. I blame the Chinese, who else would stand to gain?
    1
  47. THERE SHOULD BE NO, RESTRICTIONS ON SPEECH ( AND OBVIOUSLY,THOUGHT). THAT'S WHY WE HAVE LAWS AGAINST LIBEL AND SLANDER . THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN SUFFICIENT. ALL ELSE IS AN EXCUSE TO DESTROY FREE SPEECH AND THE WRITTEN WORD.
    1
  48. The Earlier Media (the printed word ) was owned by powerful Rich individuals, who saw to it, that their political views were reflected in each daily issue , via editors and columnists, who followed the will of the owner. When Corporate ownership became the vogue, the new Joint owner's, held sway over political direction, and still do. To some degree, TV / Radio, has followed suit. The only 'protest' the public holds sway over is, as with anything we pay for, TO STOP BUYING IT. AND, BY NOT WATCHING IT. THE RESULT can be the same. NO VIEWER'S, NO SPONSORSHIP, NO OUTPUT.
    1
  49. is dat the same as omophobia ? cause ive neva feared wonna doz.
    1
  50. AND ALL THOSE YOU KNOW. SHARE IT .
    1